(September 22, 2016 at 4:01 pm)abaris Wrote:

(September 22, 2016 at 3:56 pm)RobertE Wrote:

This is idiotic on too many levels to count. Slavery was an institute in America before the USA even existed. And it certainly wasn't a black man owning the first slaves there. It was all kinds of people, ranging from the Spanish, the british, maybe the Dutch, but I'm not sure if they even had slaves.

It's also idiotic because it's the one off example. The one that stands out in the army of white slave owners - stands out in the way that if someone wants to make a point of tu quoque can resort to that example being made available by who knows who.

Read it and weep SON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Jo...(colonist)

Here's a novel idea rather than argue emotion try and check a fact or two every once and a while...

The fact that you or anyone else does not know the first slave owner in North America was black or that Actual Africans/black people were the primary people who traded in African slave, only further underscores the level of the white guilt movement you have bought into. What we understand of slavery and what was actually practiced in this country as slavery has been so twisted most of you would not and by example of your post can not even recognize the truth when you see it.

Your understanding of Slavery in america is on Par with the average fighting age german's understanding of a jew in Nazi Germany.

Don't get me wrong we did a alot of bad crap to Africans, but alot of good came out of this as well, and without the slaves or for the slaves without America neither would exist. Meaning the descendants of slaves would not exist nor would this country.

(September 22, 2016 at 5:12 pm)Drich Wrote: Read it and weep SON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Jo...(colonist)

Here's a novel idea rather than argue emotion try and check a fact or two every once and a while...

The fact that you or anyone else does not know the first slave owner in North America was black [...]

LOL, Dripsh*t - here's a novel idea: read the page you're linking to, in order to make sure it supports your claims.

It doesn't say anywhere on that wikipedia page, that Johnson was the first slave owner in North America, you racist twit. It says:

Quote:He became one of the first property owners and slaveholders of African birth there.

But of course - you'll believe anything that suits your idiotic views, won't you, Drippy?

snip.

I reconsidered.

(September 22, 2016 at 5:31 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(September 22, 2016 at 5:12 pm)Drich Wrote: Read it and weep SON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Jo...(colonist)

Here's a novel idea rather than argue emotion try and check a fact or two every once and a while...

The fact that you or anyone else does not know the first slave owner in North America was black [...]

LOL, Dripsh*t - here's a novel idea: read the page you're linking to, in order to make sure it supports your claims.  

It doesn't say anywhere on that wikipedia page, that Johnson was the first slave owner in North America, you racist twit. It says:

Quote:He became one of the first property owners and slaveholders of African birth there.

But of course - you'll believe anything that suits your idiotic views, won't you, Drippy?

Yeah, the first documented instance of slavery proper in Virginia dates to the 1640s, when three indentured servants -- one black and two white -- ran away.  After their capture, the two white guys had their terms of service increased by four years. The black guy was sentenced to servitude for life. It was technically still "indentured servitude" but, in the case of a life sentence, that's a distinction without a difference.

(September 22, 2016 at 5:12 pm)Drich Wrote: Read it and weep SON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Jo...(colonist)

From the article you linked, you repugnant bigot:

"Though Casor was the first person declared a slave in a civil case, there were both black and white indentured servants sentenced to lifetime servitude before him."

Never mind.

Well, this thread certainly appears to have gone dumpster diving. I'm not too surprised though. It started out smelling a bit rancid. Good job, Drich.

(September 22, 2016 at 5:31 pm)Homeless Nutter Wrote:

(September 22, 2016 at 5:12 pm)Drich Wrote: Read it and weep SON
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Jo...(colonist)

Here's a novel idea rather than argue emotion try and check a fact or two every once and a while...

The fact that you or anyone else does not know the first slave owner in North America was black [...]

LOL, Dripsh*t - here's a novel idea: read the page you're linking to, in order to make sure it supports your claims.  

It doesn't say anywhere on that wikipedia page, that Johnson was the first slave owner in North America, you racist twit. It says:

Quote:He became one of the first property owners and slaveholders of African birth there.

But of course - you'll believe anything that suits your idiotic views, won't you, Drippy?

http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/slavetra.html

We are bombarded every day to stop the generalisations about black people because it is considered racist, yet at the same time, blacks love to generalise about white europeans which is somehow justified. Again, culturally speaking, you have to ask yourself as to the reason why blacks are arrested more often than any other demographic. I mean, culturally, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Indians, native American Indians and Mexicans seem to have a lower rate of arrest compared to blacks. Ask yourself why. As for the term "white guilt", I don't think anyone suffers from it at all apart from sjws. To not put a too finer point on it, you ask a black American to make a choice between racist police and the United States or Africa, he will choose the USA each time because he doesn't identify himself as African i.e. poor, living in tribes, eating very little, traditional medicine, language and religions. In the land of the free, there is everything they ever want. Perhaps if they gave something back to American society, then people might look differently.

Like this guy for example, of someone who was poor, had little understanding of the English language and was like a fish out of water:

Quote:In 1968, Cho immigrated to the United States and settled in Chicago. He spoke very little English, and the only thing he knew about the city was the name of its onetime gangster king, Al Capone. He didn’t know much more about the rest of the country, either. But he learned quickly. After a year, he moved to South Bend, Indiana, then Milwaukee, then New York City, usually working during the day and teaching tae kwon do in the evening before spending the night at the studio. Finally, in Providence, Rhode Island, he opened a small tae kwon do school and used the last of his meager savings to take out a small ad in the local paper. A couple of days later, he had fifty students. He never looked back. Within just a few years, Cho had opened eight schools throughout New England.

https://www.aimaa.com/about_gmcho.htm

He could have just got a job but no, he gave something back to American society from his culture; Tae Kwon-Do. He didn't have to, and then many decades later, he has thousands of students, many hundreds of schools and he is richer culturally and is a top bloke, since I met him once in England.

(September 22, 2016 at 11:06 pm)RobertE Wrote: We are bombarded every day to stop the generalisations about black people because it is considered racist, yet at the same time, blacks love to generalise about white europeans which is somehow justified. Again, culturally speaking, you have to ask yourself as to the reason why blacks are arrested more often than any other demographic. I mean, culturally, Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Indians, native American Indians and Mexicans seem to have a lower rate of arrest compared to blacks. Ask yourself why. As for the term "white guilt", I don't think anyone suffers from it at all apart from sjws. To not put a too finer point on it, you ask a black American to make a choice between racist police and the United States or Africa, he will choose the USA each time because he doesn't identify himself as African i.e. poor, living in tribes, eating very little, traditional medicine, language and religions. In the land of the free, there is everything they ever want. Perhaps if they gave something back to American society, then people might look differently.

How did you arrive at the conclusion that black Americans give/contribute nothing to society?