(October 16, 2016 at 12:58 pm)RobertE Wrote: Believe me, the whole of the BBC not only knew what he was like, but they defended others too.

But I'm not the BBC. Just a guy having enjoyed Top of the Pops and the German version called Beatclub. So I certainly didn't know.

(October 16, 2016 at 1:00 pm)abaris Wrote:

(October 16, 2016 at 12:58 pm)RobertE Wrote: Believe me, the whole of the BBC not only knew what he was like, but they defended others too.

But I'm not the BBC. Just a guy having enjoyed Top of the Pops and the German version called Beatclub. So I certainly didn't know.

I am not just talking about him though, the most, if not all of the BBC was heavily infested with dodgy people. For information, I forgot to include a photo that I mentioned earlier:



Furthermore, there have been politicians that have been done too, other DJs from the BBC and the list goes on.

I was laughing. The cold open was hilarious.

I love Raw Story's penchant for overdramatization, though.

By Drumpf standards, one tweet is hardly a Twitter meltdown.

Shaking my head at that sargon of akkad video called "hilary clinton must lose." I always thought he was an interesting one, because his videos are so elaborate and detailed, and he's an atheist which automatically gives a person a lot of ethos for me. But he's really going hardcore with the whole hilary clinton conspiracy stuff, quoting people like bill o riley and mike pence in his video, saying that trump would make a better president. I can't, I just can't. I don't even. I can't believe this election.

And yeah I think sargon of akkad's views on feminism and gender are stupid, and I think he's a sensationalist who likes to make stuff sound really dire all the time. This is just more of what he always does with feminist conspiracy theories.

The sad thing is that there are still people standing by this idiot as though he's a viable candidate.

Seriously, "Boys will be boys"?

(October 17, 2016 at 10:21 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: The sad thing is that there are still people standing by this idiot as though he's a viable candidate.

Seriously, "Boys will be boys"?

A scary amount of them. Not enough to elect him, thankfully but its dangerous to have that much ignorance banding together.

(October 17, 2016 at 10:21 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: The sad thing is that there are still people standing by this idiot as though he's a viable candidate.

Seriously, "Boys will be boys"?

Hey, look who's back. How was Sudan?

(October 17, 2016 at 10:34 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:

(October 17, 2016 at 10:21 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: The sad thing is that there are still people standing by this idiot as though he's a viable candidate.

Seriously, "Boys will be boys"?

Hey, look who's back.  How was Sudan?

Dusty.  primitive.  Horrible.