(November 28, 2016 at 7:41 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Mario, I would like to ask a question. It's an honest question, honestly asked and simply crying out for an honest answer. There is no animosity involved, simply pure curiosity.

Here is my question.

What the fuck are you on?

My guess is he od'd the wine gums again.

That or he's been huffing the shake 'n' vac.

(November 29, 2016 at 6:24 am)Stimbo Wrote: That or he's been huffing the shake 'n' vac.

He's religious he doesn't need drugs to be hopped up

Jesus juice beats any other mind altering substance

(November 28, 2016 at 5:08 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear readers, I am correct again, atheists here are saturated nay marinated or worst in self-seizure with hatred (I must be careful lest I also fall into such an abominable self-degradation) toward their debate opponents, instead of conducting themselves in calm reason and intelligence, which I always uphold for myself, read this post from Asmodee in ANNEX below.

Okay, dear atheists here, please do a reasonable and intelligent analysis, without lapsing into raving mad foul language, why Asmodee says that my statement, "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence," is stupid in his self-miasma of hate and fear toward me.


Haha, gotcha again, Asmodee, you have not at all taken the challenge from me to undertake the serious work of doing reasonable and intelligent analysis of my statement, "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence," putting yourself in the realm of objective reality of existence, like the nose in your face and that the fact that your papa and mama brought you into existence and life by their causation of you all the way from papa's sperm and mama's egg fusing in your mama's uterus, to the delivery by your mama of you after nine long months of gestation, Oh Asmodee who now call yourself Asmodee,* already in full term as a human being, a homo sapiens, instead of a hate-degradated atheist.

Here, dear atheist colleagues, is the way to do a reasonable and intelligent analysis of the statement above, namely: "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence," by examining your nose and the fact that your papas and mamas brought you into existence and life by their causation with your papas' sperm and your mamas' egg fusing in mamas' uterus, then after nine long months a full term human being baby, another homo sapiens comes forth from her uterus, which papas and mamas continue to nurture in all aspects of human existence and life into one day hopefully autonomous members of civilized human society.


*Cf. Asmodeus, noun
1. (in Jewish demonology) prince of the demons, see Dictionary.com.


ANNEX

Asmodee Wrote:Member
***
Religious Views: Agnostic atheist
Posts: 131
Threads: 2
Joined: 20th November 2014
Reputation: 4
#982
RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
1 hour ago
__________________


I have addressed it.  Let me recap in case you missed it.

   Quote:
   That's stupid.


Others addressed it as well, all saying pretty much the same thing.  I hope this finally clears up your perpetual confusion.

__________________
Have you ever noticed all the drug commercials on TV lately?  Why is it the side effects never include penile enlargement or super powers?
Side effects may include super powers or enlarged penis which may become permanent with continued use.  Stop taking Killatol immediately and consult your doctor if you experience penis enlargement of more than 3 inches, laser vision, superhuman strength, invulnerability, the ability to explode heads with your mind or time travel.  Killatoll is not for everyone, especially those who already have convertibles or vehicles of ridiculous size to supplement penis size.

I don't see my warning level in there.

You know I don't read your posts any more, right?  Your posts have gone from pointless repetition to desperate goading to keep the responses coming in.  You were an amusing poe for a while, but now it's old shtick.  You are absolutely either hopelessly ignorant or just fucking with us.  Either way, you're not worth any serious response.

(November 29, 2016 at 10:48 am)Asmodee Wrote: I don't see my warning level in there.

Nor should you.
The warning level is only visible to the self. Not to others.
No need to drag around the fact that the staff told you off on some odd occasion. It's there only to remind yourself.

(November 29, 2016 at 7:15 am)Orochi Wrote:

(November 29, 2016 at 6:24 am)Stimbo Wrote: That or he's been huffing the shake 'n' vac.

He's religious he doesn't need drugs to be hopped up

Jesus juice beats any other mind altering substance

You've never been to a catholic funeral with full trimmings I take it? The incense is so thick the pink elephants are the least of your worries.

(November 29, 2016 at 1:12 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:

(November 29, 2016 at 7:15 am)Orochi Wrote: He's religious he doesn't need drugs to be hopped up

Jesus juice beats any other mind altering substance

You've never been to a catholic funeral with full trimmings I take it? The incense is so thick the pink elephants are the least of your worries.

yes I in fact have yup that shit is awful would floor a heroine addict but it's effects are temporary Jesus juice haunts you from indoctrination to the grave

(November 29, 2016 at 1:12 pm)Tazzycorn Wrote:

(November 29, 2016 at 7:15 am)Orochi Wrote: He's religious he doesn't need drugs to be hopped up

Jesus juice beats any other mind altering substance

You've never been to a catholic funeral with full trimmings I take it? The incense is so thick the pink elephants are the least of your worries.

You tell the truth. My senses can only tolerate so much frankincense and myrrh.

(November 29, 2016 at 10:51 am)pocaracas Wrote:

(November 29, 2016 at 10:48 am)Asmodee Wrote: I don't see my warning level in there.

Nor should you.
The warning level is only visible to the self. Not to others.
No need to drag around the fact that the staff told you off on some odd occasion. It's there only to remind yourself.

Yeah, that was a joke because many of his responses proudly show his warning level at 0%.  Just havin' a little fun with it.

Dear readers here, I am really happy with my thread: it is very much read by folks visiting this forum.

Yesterday morning the stats were the following:
Number of posts: 981 | number of viewers: 20279

This morning the stats are the following:
Number of posts: 997 | number of viewers: 20696

20696 - 20279 = 417

The figures speak for themselves, that in one day's time there is an increase of 417 viewers for my thread, on God exists.

_________________


This morning. dear Simon Moon, I see your message for me sent prior to my last post yesterday - for I left after sending it that's why I missed Simon's post; Simon is such a civil poster though an atheist, yes it is true there are an exiguous number of civil-tongued atheists in this thread, Simon is one of them exiguous few.

Dear Simon, I have told you that you are good at fallacies all in your brain, with manipulating of words and ideas, but you should dwell in the objective reality of existence, like as with the nose in your face and the fact that even without textbooks on mammalian reproduction, you should know that you came from the causation of your papa and mama, as a newborn baby, a fellow human being, a homo sapiens, literally a man of wisdom, but you have become foolish by taking up with the wrong people, internet atheists.

Here is your message addressed to me, but you forgot to analyze it for any fallacy you in fact have committed; now tell me where is the fallacy from you in it - everyone, you can read it in ANNEX below, and I invite everyone also to seek out the fallacy in it.

Now, dear Simon, do you subscribe to the mindset that atheists are not answerable to mankind to present a decent explanation for why they embrace the self-identity of atheists with such fanatical bigotry, as to have to resort in place of a decent explanation, resort to raving mad foul language and most unseemly insults against theists and against God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?

There, when you come back, please do two things for readers of this thread:

1. Point out the fallacy in your message reproduced by me in ANNEX below, and

2. "Now, dear Simon, do you subscribe to the mindset that atheists are not answerable to mankind to present a decent explanation for why they embrace the self-identity of atheists with such fanatical bigotry, as to have to resort in place of a decent explanation, resort to raving mad foul language and most unseemly insults against theists and against God, in concept as first and foremost the creator and operator of the universe and man and everything with a beginning?


ANNEX

In post #985 Yesterday, 05:26 Simon Moon Wrote:RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
________________

Quote:(Yesterday, 05:08) Mariosep Wrote: "The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence,"

So, if the default state of reality is existence, then why is your god needed?

________________
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.