(February 12, 2017 at 8:06 am)Aoi Magi Wrote: you seem like a strong advocate of the stand-your-ground law.

Blocking traffic doesn't make it ok for people to get run over. Feeling intimidated by a crowd  also isn't a good enough reason to run over people. One can always open up a map and pick another route, and even then, if blocking traffic is a headache, there are law agents to arrest or disperse the crowd, there's no reason for a random person to run over another person just cause they are blocking the way.

No law should promote the killing of another human being, but I'm gonna point something out real quick. If one is in reasonably fear for their life or of great bodily harm, they have the right to use lethal force in self-defense or defense of another. Generally speaking. In a riot situation though, it would be hard to isolate exactly who was threatening you though. 

Whatever. 

The proposed law in the OP sanctions killing and is so horribly vague on its face that almost any court would declare it void.

I make it easy -- I avoid protests.

(February 11, 2017 at 8:49 pm)A Theist Wrote: "North Dakota lawmaker's bill protects drivers who negligently hit someone obstructing traffic"

Quote:A lawmaker in North Dakota sponsored a bill that would reportedly protect drivers who inadvertently hit pedestrians blocking traffic.

The Star Tribune reported Monday that the legislation is a response to protests at Standing Rock Indian Reservation, and sponsored by state Rep. Keith Kempenich, R-Bowman.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/...affic.html



A similar bill is also being proposed in Tennessee...

Quote:"Tennessee considers bill to protect drivers who run over protesters"



http://www.tristateupdate.com/story/3447...protesters

It's bound to happen. Sooner or later, some stupid ass rioter is going to get ran over.

So the driver of that truck earlier in Spain could say that he inadvertently drove down all those people blocking traffic. Did ISIS come up with this bill to let their driver killers off the hook?

(February 12, 2017 at 1:58 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:

(February 11, 2017 at 8:49 pm)A Theist Wrote: "North Dakota lawmaker's bill protects drivers who negligently hit someone obstructing traffic"
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/...affic.html



A similar bill is also being proposed in Tennessee...


It's bound to happen. Sooner or later, some stupid ass rioter is going to get ran over.

So the driver of that truck earlier in Spain could say that he inadvertently drove down all those people blocking traffic. Did ISIS come up with this bill to let their driver killers off the hook?

I didn't know there was a truck incident in Spain like that.
I think it's unreasonable to suggest that people won't be able to tell the difference between someone running over a crowd on purpose as part of a terrorist attack vs people attacking a vehicle and getting run over while trying to do so.

First off, the law already protected someone who is in a vehicle and under attack.

So what does it really accomplish?

Reading AT's gleefulness, I believe he's ecstatic at his political enemies dying under color (but not actual) of lawful action.

Just like Jesus would have wanted.

Oh yeah giving driver the right to commit possible mass murder or mass mutilation because they" feel" threatened. I can totally see this not backfiring .I totally don't see escalating violence at protests. Yup the protesters aren't going to start counter measures to this. They are just roll over and die. Once again Republicans prove they don't think there plans through.They just do them. Can't wait to see the next time a democrat wins an election if A asshole still supports this law when it's conservatives being killed in mass my guess is not.

(February 12, 2017 at 6:37 pm)Orochi Wrote: Once again Republicans prove they don't think there plans through.

Oh, they do. They absolutely expect for something like that happening. Look at the people cheering this on here. The lowest what humanity has to offer in terms of compassion and reason. Trusting them to piss on you while you're on fire would be entirely misplaced.

(February 12, 2017 at 7:03 pm)abaris Wrote:

(February 12, 2017 at 6:37 pm)Orochi Wrote: Once again Republicans prove they don't think there plans through.

Oh, they do. They absolutely expect for something like that happening. Look at the people cheering this on here. The lowest what humanity has to offer in terms of compassion and reason. Trusting them to piss on you while you're on fire would be entirely misplaced.

Yes I think your right there

(February 12, 2017 at 6:37 pm)Orochi Wrote: Oh yeah giving driver the right to commit possible mass murder or mass mutilation because they" feel" threatened. I can totally see this not backfiring .I totally don't see escalating violence at protests. Yup the protesters aren't going to start counter measures to this. They are just roll over and die. Once again Republicans prove they don't think there plans through.They just do them. Can't wait to see the next time a democrat wins an election if A asshole still supports this law when it's conservatives being killed in mass my guess is not.

Just wait until someone runs over some protesters at an abortion clinic.