Oh, but wait. The same self-righteous shitheads are the ones who claim that every fucking word of their babble is INERRANT. The revealed word of fucking god himself! How could that be lost?

I'll just sit back and wait for the apologists to concoct some excuse for fucking "Matthew."




Any day now......any day now.

It is interesting how some of the time, the words MUST be taken literally, while at others, interpretation is required. Is there a guide, like those old dance steps you could lay out on the floor, for when to take it one way and when to take it the other?

Such utter shit.

(July 5, 2011 at 1:09 am)Godschild Wrote:

(July 4, 2011 at 5:49 pm)Judas BentHer Wrote: 113 pages! Amazing.

There is no evidence god exists. Never has been never shall be.

However, there is proof aplenty that god does not exist.
If possessed of the Omni attributes described as characteristic of a supreme being to humans, then if a god did exist given the condition of the world and especially the chaos that exists in the name of god, then he/she is a slacker and hardly worth the effort of bending a knee in homage to that which is sadistically maltheistic and indifferent.

This proves God doesn't exist^, you must be kidding, right?

Not kidding one bit. Your Bible is not god's breath. Your Bible is absolute proof god doesn't exist.

If your god did exist, then the Bible (To paraphrase a great cliche') proves it would be better for his reputation if he didn't.

Of course I've read the Bible. And I have a Bible Dictionary just for fun, in my library. So I know what I'm talking about. You on the other hand are a Maltheist. Worshiping god who became a demi-god, so as to save the world from the damnation he set upon it because omni-benevolence (a lie) could not forgive the first of our kind for doing exactly what omniscience not only knew was to occur in the garden, but that occured because omnipotence created the two tree's of damnation that would make Adam and Eve like unto "us" if the fruit were eaten.
I love erant scripture. Especially when copyists were copying copies of copies, of copies of copies because no autograph attributed to any book in the King James "version" still exists. Because when your god created man and woman (two different times, in two different ways, which is impossible but still appears as Genesis Chapter 1 & 2) he created them in "our" image and likeness. Which means the fruit of those two tree's in the garden bearing fruits of knowledge and eternal life wouldn't matter when god said eating thereof would make Adam and Eve like unto "us" (god). Because as created they were already like unto god.
Omni-benevolence? Not hardly. Eternal damnation for a finite error? When god set it all up for Adam and Eve to fail? And then wasn't able to forgive but instead damned them eternally? Even after drowning the whole world for their sin, god repopulated through inbreeding while his curse of sin re-applied to the new life?

God? Supreme being? Higher power?
You're kidding! (No, that's not a question.) By the way, did you know that your god murdered more people according to the Bible than did his first born son, his first and most beautiful Angel (Latin: Angli = Emmisary) ?

No?
Well, you do now.

Maltheism! It's that post script for Christianity.

(July 6, 2011 at 5:22 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Why Joseph was chosen as the "father", or mary the mother, and why the idea of god impregnating her rather than he simply being Josephs actual son are important. You could take this back to the stories of the old testament as well, but many christians are willing to just write that book off completely.

You mean, other than the fact that she was, according to some traditions, impregnated by a Roman soldier named Panthera. Or, that she had 5 other sons, even though she is referred to by the Roman Catholic Church as a perpetual virgin.

The Christians write off the Old Testament, even though their founder and Savior said, in Matthew 5:17-19, that they'd BETTER follow all of the Law. It just shows that the Christians cherry-pick what they will and won't follow, regardless of what it says is or is not important. This is just more evidence that they don't believe in the whole story any more than I do - it's all pretend.

It was the great cosmic rationalization. Just like all the girls who were "mysteriously" impregnated by Zeus ("well, he looked like Zeus!") at public festivals in ancient Greece.

(July 6, 2011 at 7:29 pm)BethK Wrote: even though she is referred to by the Roman Catholic Church as a perpetual virgin.

Perpetual Virgin - Translation: Her cherry kept growing back! Birth after birth after birth!

Swear to god! It's a miracle.

(July 6, 2011 at 6:52 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Matthew 2:23 is horseshit.

Quote:And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene.

There is no such "prophecy" in the OT.

A "Nazarene" is not "someone from Nazareth". A "Nazarene" is someone from a particular mystical sect of Judaism, related to the Essenes. And, there is STILL no such prophecy in the OT, or in any apocryphal book discovered to date.

---

(July 6, 2011 at 7:40 pm)Judas BentHer Wrote: Perpetual Virgin - Translation: Her cherry kept growing back! Birth after birth after birth!

Swear to god! It's a miracle.

There are doctors in Japan who can effect the same thing.... for a price.

Look, Jesus couldn't have been a Nazarene, they were vegans...and who the hell was going to trust a vegan?

Let it be known: any man who does not like ribs....is immediately suspect.

Such a man cannot exist according to the bibble.

(July 6, 2011 at 7:43 pm)BethK Wrote: There are doctors in Japan who can effect the same thing.... for a price.

Yeah, but they're just perpetual virgin fixing copy cats.