Posts: 9911
Threads: 21
Joined: September 8, 2015
Reputation:
79
RE: Last Non-winter
April 3, 2020 at 10:09 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2020 at 10:10 pm by Fireball.)
(April 3, 2020 at 9:43 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Quote:But the real world final results will show MORE pollution than you started with.
Nope
Quote:I am not pro-pollution.
No you pro eugenics
Quote:I am in favor of solutions that work -
Accept it won't
Quote:Like drastic.population control - to reduce real demand.
Won't work
So, I just have to ask- does OLB bleach his anal sphincter, and does it have hair around it? You've got your nose shoved in there close enough that you should be able give a detailed report. Every time he posts something, you're in there with little shit retort lines and no substance. Weird.
If you get to thinking you’re a person of some influence, try ordering somebody else’s dog around.
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Last Non-winter
April 3, 2020 at 10:11 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2020 at 10:13 pm by onlinebiker.)
Ignorant twatwaffle
Edit to add
Not you FB
But I'm guessing you knew that...
I just wanted to clarify it for the ignorant twatwaffle...
Posts: 11233
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Last Non-winter
April 3, 2020 at 10:24 pm
(This post was last modified: April 3, 2020 at 10:25 pm by The Architect Of Fate.)
(April 3, 2020 at 10:09 pm)Fireball Wrote: (April 3, 2020 at 9:43 pm)SUNGULA Wrote: Nope
No you pro eugenics
Accept it won't
Won't work
So, I just have to ask- does OLB bleach his anal sphincter, and does it have hair around it? You've got your nose shoved in there close enough that you should be able give a detailed report. Every time he posts something, you're in there with little shit retort lines and no substance. Weird. 1. Wouldn't know
2.It's always funny to me people say that when in reality ignore half his posts and even whole threads written by him .That's weird
3.As for substance
Are you agreeing with his claim that recycling would lead to more pollution? if not then my response is accurate
Are you denying population control is a form of eugenics or at he very least is a central policy of eugenics .If not then my statement is accurate
Are you agreeing with him that population reduction will curve pollution despite the clear fallacy in that line of reasoning . If not then my statement is accurate
So tell me what about the above isn't substantive ?
Quote:Ignorant twatwaffle
Edit to add
Not you FB
But I'm guessing you knew that...
I just wanted to clarify it for the ignorant twatwaffle...
Too bad it isn't and your statements are
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 67253
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 8:05 am
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2020 at 8:08 am by The Grand Nudger.)
I really don't get this, recycling works. Sometimes the programs are expensive..but they do work.
Pop control won't reduce demand for something - less than 1% of us account for the majority of demand for anything. For "things" in the aggregate, resource distribution and consumption is unfair, with a larger but still vanishingly small portion of the world population consuming the lions share of everything produced.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 8:50 am
(April 4, 2020 at 8:05 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I really don't get this, recycling works. Sometimes the programs are expensive..but they do work.
Pop control won't reduce demand for something - less than 1% of us account for the majority of demand for anything. For "things" in the aggregate, resource distribution and consumption is unfair, with a larger but still vanishingly small portion of the world population consuming the lions share of everything produced.
What part don't you understand?
It's very simple.
When you burn the fuel you created the pollutants in the air are the same WITH THE ADDITION of the pollution from the fuel you used to build fuel.
Posts: 237
Threads: 4
Joined: January 7, 2020
Reputation:
0
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 9:04 am
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2020 at 9:15 am by Succubus#2.)
(April 4, 2020 at 8:05 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I really don't get this, recycling works. Sometimes the programs are expensive..but they do work.
Pop control won't reduce demand for something - less than 1% of us account for the majority of demand for anything. For "things" in the aggregate, resource distribution and consumption is unfair, with a larger but still vanishingly small portion of the world population consuming the lions share of everything produced.
I think where this thread turned into a three pronged clusterfuck is that we were promoting two separate but related issues. That and my love of big fucking compressors.
Was there anything more beautiful.
Look how shiny it is.
Miserable Bastard.
Posts: 17104
Threads: 462
Joined: March 29, 2015
Reputation:
30
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 9:11 am
(April 4, 2020 at 8:50 am)onlinebiker Wrote: (April 4, 2020 at 8:05 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I really don't get this, recycling works. Sometimes the programs are expensive..but they do work.
Pop control won't reduce demand for something - less than 1% of us account for the majority of demand for anything. For "things" in the aggregate, resource distribution and consumption is unfair, with a larger but still vanishingly small portion of the world population consuming the lions share of everything produced.
What part don't you understand?
It's very simple.
When you burn the fuel you created the pollutants in the air are the same WITH THE ADDITION of the pollution from the fuel you used to build fuel.
There are clean energy sources. For instance in Iceland 90% of homes use energy that comes from geothermal sources, and you can build these machines that create recycled fuel anywhere in the world, like in parts where clean energy is in abundance.
teachings of the Bible are so muddled and self-contradictory that it was possible for Christians to happily burn heretics alive for five long centuries. It was even possible for the most venerated patriarchs of the Church, like St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, to conclude that heretics should be tortured (Augustine) or killed outright (Aquinas). Martin Luther and John Calvin advocated the wholesale murder of heretics, apostates, Jews, and witches. - Sam Harris, "Letter To A Christian Nation"
Posts: 11233
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 9:15 am
(This post was last modified: April 4, 2020 at 9:16 am by The Architect Of Fate.)
Quote:When you burn the fuel you created the pollutants in the air are the same WITH THE ADDITION of the pollution from the fuel you used to build fuel.
No you don't get it that's not the case
(April 4, 2020 at 8:05 am)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I really don't get this, recycling works. Sometimes the programs are expensive..but they do work.
Pop control won't reduce demand for something - less than 1% of us account for the majority of demand for anything. For "things" in the aggregate, resource distribution and consumption is unfair, with a larger but still vanishingly small portion of the world population consuming the lions share of everything produced. No kidding
You think this would be a no brainer
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 9538
Threads: 410
Joined: October 3, 2018
Reputation:
17
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 9:29 am
(April 4, 2020 at 9:11 am)Fake Messiah Wrote: (April 4, 2020 at 8:50 am)onlinebiker Wrote: What part don't you understand?
It's very simple.
When you burn the fuel you created the pollutants in the air are the same WITH THE ADDITION of the pollution from the fuel you used to build fuel.
There are clean energy sources. For instance in Iceland 90% of homes use energy that comes from geothermal sources, and you can build these machines that create recycled fuel anywhere in the world, like in parts where clean energy is in abundance.
You don't go elephant hunting in Walmart's parking lot. You go where there are elephants.
Do you think Iceland has lotsa smog you can mine?
....
Posts: 11233
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: Last Non-winter
April 4, 2020 at 9:35 am
Quote:You don't go elephant hunting in Walmart's parking lot. You go where there are elephants.
Do you think Iceland has lotsa smog you can mine?
And you continue to not get it
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
|