(March 31, 2021 at 7:48 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: People who try to cast doubt on what was seen in the video remind me of the 9-11 conspiracy nut jobs. Did you not see the planes fly into the buildings?

Boru

Oh, come now. You know the galactic empire did it 

(March 31, 2021 at 12:24 pm)Brian37 Wrote: The defense cross is asking about the tobacco shop and age requirements to get in to that portion of the store.

WHAT THE FUCK? What the fuck does that have to do with a knee on Floyd's neck?

It’s called ‘discredit the witness.’  You’re perfectly correct that it doesn’t have anything to do with Floyd’s death. If the defense can get the clerk to admit that underage people are allowed it that section of the shop, he can establish in the jurors’ minds that the witness is unreliable, so ANY witness could be unreliable.

It’s a very common courtroom tactic and is frequently used when the prosecution have a very strong case, such as video of a cop kneeling on someone’s neck until (and after) that someone died.

Boru

(March 31, 2021 at 7:48 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: People who try to cast doubt on what was seen in the video remind me of the 9-11 conspiracy nut jobs. Did you not see the planes fly into the buildings?

Boru

Funny thing about that... after the first plane hit, there were witnesses and news people thinking it was an accident, not a terrorist attack.

And we had no idea that people in the Saudi government funded the hijackers, until that info was made public many years later.

(March 31, 2021 at 5:28 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:

(March 31, 2021 at 7:48 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: People who try to cast doubt on what was seen in the video remind me of the 9-11 conspiracy nut jobs. Did you not see the planes fly into the buildings?

Boru

Funny thing about that... after the first plane hit, there were witnesses and news people thinking it was an accident, not a terrorist attack.

Did any of them think the buildings fell down because of some other reason than jetliners crashing into them?

Boru

Quote:Funny thing about that... after the first plane hit, there were witnesses and news people thinking it was an accident, not a terrorist attack.

Did anybody think anything aside from the jet liner caused the towers to come down?

Quote:And we had no idea that people in the Saudi government funded the hijackers, until that info was made public many years later.

Which has nothing to do with the fact the towers were knocked down by a plane

(March 31, 2021 at 5:31 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote:

(March 31, 2021 at 5:28 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Funny thing about that... after the first plane hit, there were witnesses and news people thinking it was an accident, not a terrorist attack.

Did any of them think the buildings fell down because of some other reason than jetliners crashing into them?

Boru

Yes, I do believe some media reported that there may be explosive devices in the buildings, and some firefighters and others were claiming that they heard explosives going off. This was an illusion and they were not hearing what they thought they were hearing of course, but this was initially being reported as a possibility.

(March 31, 2021 at 3:49 pm)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: It’s called ‘discredit the witness.’  You’re perfectly correct that it doesn’t have anything to do with Floyd’s death. If the defense can get the clerk to admit that underage people are allowed it that section of the shop, he can establish in the jurors’ minds that the witness is unreliable, so ANY witness could be unreliable.

It’s a very common courtroom tactic and is frequently used when the prosecution have a very strong case, such as video of a cop kneeling on someone’s neck until (and after) that someone died.

Boru

You're probably right.  Embarrass a witness into a lie, and then claim they can't be trusted.

However, I still think this is possible:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34Em8BkZYnI

(March 31, 2021 at 5:28 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote:

(March 31, 2021 at 7:48 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: People who try to cast doubt on what was seen in the video remind me of the 9-11 conspiracy nut jobs. Did you not see the planes fly into the buildings?

Boru

Funny thing about that... after the first plane hit, there were witnesses and news people thinking it was an accident, not a terrorist attack.

And we had no idea that people in the Saudi government funded the hijackers, until that info was made public many years later.

A lot of people thought it was an accident when they first announced the plane flying into the first building but it certainly didn't take years to figure out who was behind it.  

It was a very short time that the second plane hit, then the one at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania.

What are you babbling about that it took years?

(March 31, 2021 at 6:04 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:

(March 31, 2021 at 5:28 pm)Irreligious Atheist Wrote: Funny thing about that... after the first plane hit, there were witnesses and news people thinking it was an accident, not a terrorist attack.

And we had no idea that people in the Saudi government funded the hijackers, until that info was made public many years later.

A lot of people thought it was an accident when they first announced the plane flying into the first building but it certainly didn't take years to figure out who was behind it.  

It was a very short time that the second plane hit, then the one at the Pentagon and in Pennsylvania.

What are you babbling about that it took years?

https://www.nydailynews.com/news/nationa...-1.3003684

It didn't take years to find out that Saudi officials funded the hijackers. It just took years for the common man to be told the truth. That info was just kept classified to protect the Saudi government, one of the US's top allies.

And as far as media members thinking there were bombs in the buildings..

Funny the video clip you just showed clearly mentions a plane ...... hehe. Oh and that was hardly a majority belief.

Oh, I need I point out George Floyd's death was a lot more obvious.

But keep peddling "alternative facts "