Posts: 11217
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 8:55 pm
Quote:To be completely honest, I might be able to relate to why females may get attracted to each other. But why a male would prefer a male rectum to female physiology is completely beyond me.
So more thing you don't get .....Big surprise
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 1101
Threads: 15
Joined: November 29, 2019
Reputation:
2
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 8:56 pm
(June 30, 2021 at 8:44 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It’s striking that his first sentence up there provides refutation of his own allocation argument. This is how I know he’s not a complete basket case.
I don't see how its refutes my argument. Any behavior that disturbs an optimal allocation of natural resources is a problem.
Posts: 16530
Threads: 127
Joined: July 10, 2013
Reputation:
65
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 8:56 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2021 at 8:57 pm by arewethereyet.)
(June 30, 2021 at 8:54 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: (June 30, 2021 at 8:40 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: You're really beginning to strike me as one who is afraid of his own sexual orientation.
To be completely honest, I might be able to relate to why females may get attracted to each other. But why a male would prefer a male rectum to female physiology is completely beyond me.
So it really isn't about homosexuality at all, is it?
You are fine with the thought of two women together in a sexual way but the idea of two men freaks you out.
It's not about what's right, wrong, or against some holy book. It's about what makes you feel all icky.
Got it.
Posts: 67243
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 8:59 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2021 at 9:01 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
I’m not going to requote the trash chain.
You objected to a person by saying there were better ways to reduce population, so we needn’t promote these sexualities, and at bottom, conceded that your idea of captive female resources probably wasn’t the best way to get laid.
Didn’t even notice?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 11217
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:00 pm
Quote:I don't see how its refutes my argument. Any behavior that disturbs an optimal allocation of natural resources is a problem.
It wasn't meant to refute your terrible argument, And nothing about allowing gay people to have relationships disturbs survival or reproduction in meaningful way and even if it did that's no an argument against homosexuality and sure as hell doesn't put it on the same level as murder
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 1101
Threads: 15
Joined: November 29, 2019
Reputation:
2
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:01 pm
(June 30, 2021 at 8:56 pm)arewethereyet Wrote: (June 30, 2021 at 8:54 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: To be completely honest, I might be able to relate to why females may get attracted to each other. But why a male would prefer a male rectum to female physiology is completely beyond me.
So it really isn't about homosexuality at all, is it?
You are fine with the thought of two women together in a sexual way but the idea of two men freaks you out.
It's not about what's right, wrong, or against some holy book. It's about what makes you feel all icky.
Got it.
Me being fine with some thought doesn't make it right, either. That wasn't an apology for lesbian relationships. I was pointing out why I consider male-on-male sex to be a pathology, absent any moral/social/religious consideration.
Posts: 11217
Threads: 29
Joined: December 8, 2019
Reputation:
14
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:02 pm
Quote:Me being fine with some thought doesn't make it right, either. That wasn't an apology for lesbian relationships. I was pointing out why I consider male-on-male sex to be a pathology, absent any moral/social/religious consideration.
Too bad for you Homosexuality isn't a pathology
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Posts: 1101
Threads: 15
Joined: November 29, 2019
Reputation:
2
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:03 pm
(June 30, 2021 at 8:59 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I’m not going to requote the trash chain.
You objected to a person by saying there were better ways to reduce population, so we needn’t promote these sexualities, and at bottom, conceded that your idea of captive female resources probably wasn’t the best way to get laid.
Didn’t even notice?
I am not sure why you take these sidenotes so literally. It's really not hard to understand why homosexuality doesn't benefit survival and procreation, I don't even get why we're arguing about this.
Posts: 4446
Threads: 87
Joined: December 2, 2009
Reputation:
47
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:03 pm
I had to skip pages 6-10 this is a hot mess. Let’s use your definition then Klor- “ by natural = any action that serves our instincts of survival+procreation” could finding love serve our instincts for survival within a society? If u answer yes and sexual orientation is currently estimated @25% genetic according to your article; fulfilling the need to be loved by whatever you deem fit serves individuals. Whether you get it, or whether u have oughts that get in the way is irrelevant. It’s good for people to find love and harmony. Have you been helping that end or are u too worried about your tail end being violated?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post
always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Posts: 67243
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: forbidding people to love each other
June 30, 2021 at 9:05 pm
(This post was last modified: June 30, 2021 at 9:06 pm by The Grand Nudger.)
There are probably a lot of completely straight and very thirsty women who feel pretty much how you feel when considering two men having sex, when considering sex with you.
Food for thought. Now, does that make sex with you wrong or unnatural, both perhaps, Kloro?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
|