Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 6, 2024, 1:52 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
forbidding people to love each other
#91
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Quote:To be completely honest, I might be able to relate to why females may get attracted to each other. But why a male would prefer a male rectum to female physiology is completely beyond me.
So more thing you don't get .....Big surprise Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#92
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 8:44 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: It’s striking that his first sentence up there provides refutation of his own allocation argument.  This is how I know he’s not a complete basket case.

I don't see how its refutes my argument. Any behavior that disturbs an optimal allocation of natural resources is a problem.
Reply
#93
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 8:54 pm)Klorophyll Wrote:
(June 30, 2021 at 8:40 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: You're really beginning to strike me as one who is afraid of his own sexual orientation.

To be completely honest, I might be able to relate to why females may get attracted to each other. But why a male would prefer a male rectum to female physiology is completely beyond me.

So it really isn't about homosexuality at all, is it?

You are fine with the thought of two women together in a sexual way but the idea of two men freaks you out.

It's not about what's right, wrong, or against some holy book. It's about what makes you feel all icky.

Got it.
[Image: MmQV79M.png]  
                                      
Reply
#94
RE: forbidding people to love each other
I’m not going to requote the trash chain.

You objected to a person by saying there were better ways to reduce population, so we needn’t promote these sexualities, and at bottom, conceded that your idea of captive female resources probably wasn’t the best way to get laid.

Didn’t even notice?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#95
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Quote:I don't see how its refutes my argument. Any behavior that disturbs an optimal allocation of natural resources is a problem.
It wasn't meant to refute your terrible argument, And nothing about allowing gay people to have relationships disturbs survival or reproduction in meaningful way and even if it did that's no an argument against homosexuality and sure as hell doesn't put it on the same level as murder  Hehe
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#96
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 8:56 pm)arewethereyet Wrote:
(June 30, 2021 at 8:54 pm)Klorophyll Wrote: To be completely honest, I might be able to relate to why females may get attracted to each other. But why a male would prefer a male rectum to female physiology is completely beyond me.

So it really isn't about homosexuality at all, is it?

You are fine with the thought of two women together in a sexual way but the idea of two men freaks you out.

It's not about what's right, wrong, or against some holy book.  It's about what makes you feel all icky.

Got it.

Me being fine with some thought doesn't make it right, either. That wasn't an apology for lesbian relationships. I was pointing out why I consider male-on-male sex to be a pathology, absent any moral/social/religious consideration.
Reply
#97
RE: forbidding people to love each other
Quote:Me being fine with some thought doesn't make it right, either. That wasn't an apology for lesbian relationships. I was pointing out why I consider male-on-male sex to be a pathology, absent any moral/social/religious consideration.
Too bad for you Homosexuality isn't a pathology
"Change was inevitable"


Nemo sicut deus debet esse!

[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]



 “No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM


      
Reply
#98
RE: forbidding people to love each other
(June 30, 2021 at 8:59 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: I’m not going to requote the trash chain.

You objected to a person by saying there were better ways to reduce population, so we needn’t promote these sexualities, and at bottom, conceded that your idea of captive female resources probably wasn’t the best way to get laid.

Didn’t even notice?

I am not sure why you take these sidenotes so literally. It's really not hard to understand why homosexuality doesn't benefit survival and procreation, I don't even get why we're arguing about this.
Reply
#99
RE: forbidding people to love each other
I had to skip pages 6-10 this is a hot mess. Let’s use your definition then Klor- “ by natural = any action that serves our instincts of survival+procreation” could finding love serve our instincts for survival within a society? If u answer yes and sexual orientation is currently estimated @25% genetic according to your article; fulfilling the need to be loved by whatever you deem fit serves individuals. Whether you get it, or whether u have oughts that get in the way is irrelevant. It’s good for people to find love and harmony. Have you been helping that end or are u too worried about your tail end being violated?
"There ought to be a term that would designate those who actually follow the teachings of Jesus, since the word 'Christian' has been largely divorced from those teachings, and so polluted by fundamentalists that it has come to connote their polar opposite: intolerance, vindictive hatred, and bigotry." -- Philip Stater, Huffington Post

always working on cleaning my windows- me regarding Johari
Reply
RE: forbidding people to love each other
There are probably a lot of completely straight and very thirsty women who feel pretty much how you feel when considering two men having sex, when considering sex with you.

Food for thought. Now, does that make sex with you wrong or unnatural, both perhaps, Kloro?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A thing about religious (and other) people and the illusion of free will ShinyCrystals 265 23359 December 6, 2023 at 12:21 am
Last Post: Harry Haller
  What is a theist other then the basic definition? Quill01 4 866 August 1, 2022 at 11:16 am
Last Post: onlinebiker
  Flat Earther, and other conspiracy theories. Are they mostly atheists? Ferrocyanide 95 10468 April 26, 2021 at 3:56 am
Last Post: Tomatoshadow2
  "Thou shalt have no other gods before Me" ignoramus 121 24218 March 5, 2021 at 6:42 am
Last Post: arewethereyet
  Love of God vs love of a woman Mystic 51 7224 September 26, 2018 at 9:49 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  Proof of Jesus through Personal testimony. Christianity over other faiths orthodox-man 46 9585 January 29, 2018 at 10:05 pm
Last Post: Cyberman
  Why do some moderates get so attached to other believers? Der/die AtheistIn 4 1414 December 19, 2017 at 9:28 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  I had a religious experience the other night I_am_not_mafia 34 6179 November 22, 2017 at 9:44 am
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Are you and your significant other a "real" power couple? Silver 19 3289 August 4, 2016 at 8:13 am
Last Post: ignoramus
  Why do people on here act as if Islam if no worse than any other faith? Hoppingbunny 64 13553 April 24, 2016 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: paulpablo



Users browsing this thread: 13 Guest(s)