Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: September 19, 2024, 12:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Presidential Debate of June 27th
#41
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 22, 2024 at 11:03 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(August 22, 2024 at 10:54 pm)Ivan Denisovich Wrote: There is no hard definition of this beyond rejecting liberal principles (though still using liberal language at least in part) and wanting to transform democratic state into parody of itself.

That's really on-point. They want to claim the language of liberalism, but want illiberal mean to enforce it. Freedom for everyone, but wimmenfolk get harnessed to the birthing-straps and black folks get kept in "black jobs".

Never mind the illegals who pluck our tomatoes and clip our celery -- they can't vote so they don't matter at all.

But hey, we want rights for all, now don't we?

Exactly. New right seeing that yearning for Hitler did not bring the votes started co-opting liberal language and sadly results seems to be good (for them) judging by popularity of far right worldwide.

Of course one can say that it shows something being deeply wrong with democracy (or rather elected politicians) if voters fall for it and even I must say that sometimes they stumble upon real problems, though their solutions are beyond idiotic.
The first revolt is against the supreme tyranny of theology, of the phantom of God. As long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth.

Mikhail Bakunin.

The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance.

Socrates.
Reply
#42
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 22, 2024 at 11:10 pm)Ivan Denisovich Wrote:
(August 22, 2024 at 11:03 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: That's really on-point. They want to claim the language of liberalism, but want illiberal mean to enforce it. Freedom for everyone, but wimmenfolk get harnessed to the birthing-straps and black folks get kept in "black jobs".

Never mind the illegals who pluck our tomatoes and clip our celery -- they can't vote so they don't matter at all.

But hey, we want rights for all, now don't we?

Exactly. New right seeing that yearning for Hitler did not bring the votes started co-opting liberal language and sadly results seems to be good (for them) judging by popularity of far right worldwide.

Of course one can say that it shows something being deeply wrong with democracy (or rather elected politicians) if voters fall for it and even I must say that sometimes they stumble upon real problems, though their solutions are beyond idiotic.

I think it speaks more to our electorate and our system of education, rather than democracy itself. Democracy does indeed require an educated electorate, and that does scare politicians, but I'd say it falls on voters who can't discern bullshit from apple-butter.
Reply
#43
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 22, 2024 at 11:26 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(August 22, 2024 at 11:10 pm)Ivan Denisovich Wrote: Exactly. New right seeing that yearning for Hitler did not bring the votes started co-opting liberal language and sadly results seems to be good (for them) judging by popularity of far right worldwide.

Of course one can say that it shows something being deeply wrong with democracy (or rather elected politicians) if voters fall for it and even I must say that sometimes they stumble upon real problems, though their solutions are beyond idiotic.

I think it speaks more to our electorate and our system of education, rather than democracy itself. Democracy does indeed require an educated electorate, and that does scare politicians, but I'd say it falls on voters who can't discern bullshit from apple-butter.

Educated electorate is one thing but I would put more blame on politicians. What voters can do when politician lies deliberately about what he will do after being elected? To me it is no wonder that people buy into far right message of mainstream politicians not giving a shit about them as it is dog own truth. It's simply that far righters despite making correct diagnosis offer "cure" that is worse than disease.
The first revolt is against the supreme tyranny of theology, of the phantom of God. As long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth.

Mikhail Bakunin.

The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance.

Socrates.
Reply
#44
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
People have been studying this since the 90's when it appears to have begun (in the us at least).  The victimhood complex of white supremacy.  It knowingly exploits real problems - many of which it has intentionally created, as the backdrop for that victimhood complex, in a population programmed towards liberalism and liberal language.  

The middlemen may mean it, but institutionally, it's a way of cracking the working class so that it can't threaten our owners.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#45
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
When you don't think, you allow them to do the thinking for you.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Reply
#46
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 22, 2024 at 11:57 pm)The Grand Nudger Wrote: The middlemen may mean it, but institutionally, it's a way of cracking the working class so that it can't threaten our owners.

Gotta keep the proles from unitiing in common cause, of course
Reply
#47
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 22, 2024 at 10:37 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(August 22, 2024 at 10:04 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: Then you're not paying any fucking attention at all.

I think @Leonardo17 is actually right, insofar as the Republicans have any ideology at all. The Republicans who really believe their ideology -- Kinzinger, Cheney, Romney, and so on -- have already walked out. Not that that's a good thing, they should have stayed and fought for the soul of the party, but the ragged remainders don't give a shit about ideology at all, they just want to hitch their trailer to the Trump oxen and hope to make out.

The remainders have no ideology. They're sucking the cultish dick, the JD Vances of the world. The ideologues are bailing out. That's good for 2024. We'll see how deep that "conviction" is.

The truly problematic ideologies are't held by the ones who have walked out, but by the fascists who remain, and Trump is the enabler-in-chief.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
#48
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 23, 2024 at 4:20 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: The truly problematic ideologies are't held by the ones who have walked out, but by the fascists who remain, and Trump is the enabler-in-chief.

They have no ideology. They only have a lust for power. Ted Cruz took Trump insinuating his father was involved in the JFK assassination, and then calling his wife ugly, and then turned around and gratefully bolted down his share of schlong in order to ride Trumpeteer votes. That's not to say their lack of ideology is not a big problem -- it is.

I believe that like Cruz, most of them aren't ideologues, but rather office-holders enamored of power already gained, or like Vance, sticking onto the Trumpeteers like a remora on a shark in order to scavenge a better living than they could find swimming the ocean on their own.

Rather than Trump being their enabler-in-chief, Trump is rather their coattail-puller, and they only enable him insofar as they can ride his coattails, in my opinion. I think you may have it backwards. They need his base a lot more than he needs them.

Reply
#49
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
The reasons they all denounced Trump in the beginning then deep throating him now is because they were shown project 2025.

That is their goal, to make this the Xian States of America.

Reply
#50
RE: The Presidential Debate of June 27th
(August 23, 2024 at 9:55 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:
(August 23, 2024 at 4:20 pm)Ravenshire Wrote: The truly problematic ideologies are't held by the ones who have walked out, but by the fascists who remain, and Trump is the enabler-in-chief.

They have no ideology. They only have a lust for power. Ted Cruz took Trump insinuating his father was involved in the JFK assassination, and then calling his wife ugly, and then turned around and gratefully bolted down his share of schlong in order to ride Trumpeteer votes.  That's not to say their lack of ideology is not a big problem -- it is.

I believe that like Cruz, most of them aren't ideologues, but rather office-holders enamored of power already gained, or like Vance, sticking onto the Trumpeteers like a remora on a shark in order to scavenge a better living than they could find swimming the ocean on their own.

Rather than Trump being their enabler-in-chief, Trump is rather their coattail-puller, and they only enable him insofar as they can ride his coattails, in my opinion. I think you may have it backwards. They need his base a lot more than he needs them.

I don't really believe in existence of non-ideological politicians (or humans for that matter). Sure ideology could take second place to lust for power but why wouldn't it be ideology that pushes them to said lust? Whether they're fascists, authoritarians, reactionaries, illiberals or nationalists (or whatever else) it is perfect reason for them to want to get power to remade US in their image.

In my view we all have our ideologies (perhaps incoherent or fragmented sometimes as befits XXI century, or staying in the background). It's just that not everyone broadcast them loudly.
The first revolt is against the supreme tyranny of theology, of the phantom of God. As long as we have a master in heaven, we will be slaves on earth.

Mikhail Bakunin.

The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance.

Socrates.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  1rst Pres debate vs the VP debate and mods. Brian37 27 1982 October 9, 2020 at 8:48 am
Last Post: Angrboda
  Is this debate about legal vs illegal immigration or white vs brown immigrants? Aegon 66 6643 August 25, 2019 at 1:21 pm
Last Post: onlinebiker
  The Delusional Twit Thinks He Is "Presidential" Minimalist 27 6575 July 29, 2017 at 4:18 am
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  French Presidential elections pocaracas 30 6640 May 7, 2017 at 9:38 pm
Last Post: Alex K
  Debate 3 over, Hillary kicked his ass. Brian37 32 6279 October 20, 2016 at 8:27 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Orlando shooting/The non gun debate Drich 285 40148 June 28, 2016 at 2:32 pm
Last Post: Thumpalumpacus
  Max Security Prison's Debate Team Bests Harvard TheRocketSurgeon 24 2997 October 8, 2015 at 3:30 am
Last Post: Violet



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)