The angels in the painting have a “diabolical, homosexual look” in their faces.

Read more: http://digitaljournal.com/article/292901#ixzz1k7K6M83C

http://digitaljournal.com/article/292901

Its a christian Rorshach....the priest is seeing in that painting what he obsesses about.....

big...diabolical....gay...angels.

At least they are adults instead of children this time, so its not that bad.

Hang on a minute...if you can identify gay people from facial features...and facial features are genetic...then...oh no...BACKTRACK DAMMIT!!! BACKTRACK!!!

(January 21, 2012 at 3:21 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Hang on a minute...if you can identify gay people from facial features...and facial features are genetic...then...oh no...BACKTRACK DAMMIT!!! BACKTRACK!!!

In recent years, the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary said that he believed homosexuality was determined by birth but still felt it was a sin because it's attributable to "the fall".

Proving to their satisfaction that homosexuality is part of nature and determined by birth won't force them to admit that gays deserve equal rights because they can fall back to the "we live in a fallen world filled with sin". This is, after all, the same religion that tells me I've committed adultery with every woman I've ever felt lust for.

Can someone link to the full artwork please? I can't find it.

If there is one thing I would expect it is that a priest can tell what a homosexual looks like.

I'd just like to know what a “diabolical, homosexual look” is.

(January 21, 2012 at 4:01 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: This is, after all, the same religion that tells me I've committed adultery with every woman I've ever felt lust for.

But, hey, at least that's the sort of thing you can spin to your advantage. For instance, if, in fact, lusting after a woman is the same as actually committing adultery, I have boned:
*Drew Barrymore
*Mandy Moore
*Jodie Foster
*Marilyn Monroe
*Joss Stone
*Shakira
*Rosario Dawson
*Sarah Michelle Gellar
*The entire female cast of Saved by the Bell (except Lisa)
*Goldie Hawn
*Salma Hayek
*Lucy Lawless (and Renee O'Connor)
*t.A.T.u.
*Jenny McCarthy (as evil [definition: a misguided person who will stop at nothing to further eir misguided goals) as I think she is for her work with Generation Rescue, she is hot)
And that's just counting some of the celebrities I've rubbed one out to; even before beginning to count people I know IRL, it'd be even bigger. And, for that matter, would the directive still apply to Perverse Sexual Lust?

(January 21, 2012 at 11:21 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:

(January 21, 2012 at 4:01 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: This is, after all, the same religion that tells me I've committed adultery with every woman I've ever felt lust for.

But, hey, at least that's the sort of thing you can spin to your advantage. For instance, if, in fact, lusting after a woman is the same as actually committing adultery, I have boned:
*Drew Barrymore
*Mandy Moore
*Jodie Foster
*Marilyn Monroe
*Joss Stone
*Shakira
*Rosario Dawson
*Sarah Michelle Gellar
*The entire female cast of Saved by the Bell (except Lisa)
*Goldie Hawn
*Salma Hayek
*Lucy Lawless (and Renee O'Connor)
*t.A.T.u.
*Jenny McCarthy (as evil [definition: a misguided person who will stop at nothing to further eir misguided goals) as I think she is for her work with Generation Rescue, she is hot)
And that's just counting some of the celebrities I've rubbed one out to; even before beginning to count people I know IRL, it'd be even bigger. And, for that matter, would the directive still apply to Perverse Sexual Lust?

Me too

(January 21, 2012 at 10:40 pm)Ziploc Surprise Wrote: I'd just like to know what a “diabolical, homosexual look” is.