Why is "sarah" quoting herself?

Oh right, she's completely clueless on how to use simple tags. Well fuck that, I'm not reading a pile of inane drivel that'll make my eyeballs swivel around in protest.

(April 20, 2012 at 1:05 pm)sarah888 Wrote: you seem angry, you cant correspond in a mature manner. You like a rigged game. Im not upset you do not understand nor comprehend, you muddle and you revert back to semantics to prove your point which is to refute and disregard any biblical hitstory.

Here is a message from Mr Darwin[/b]

message from mr. Darwin "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God” – Letters of Charles Darwin [/b]

Sarah

Oh Sarah, is your last name, by any chance, Palin?

It seems that you are so stupid that you don't even understand how a conversation works. You are just shitting the same crap across threads without even once responding to the points made by others.

If there is a god, then you should hate him for making you so dumb, for not even giving you basic grammar skills or any knowledge of how reality works. In fact, he didn't even give you enough to differentiate between fact and fiction. Oh, and apparently, he gave you bad eyesight as well.

Maybe that's why you are so angry all the time. You are the one who is actually angry at god.

Yes, I know, you are going to say that you are not angry at god and you love him and he loves you and he is wonderful and blah, blah, blah. I understand your position and I sympathize with you.

I understand that you cannot say what you are actually feeling. I understand that you cannot even bear to think it, because you are so afraid of how god will fuck you up if you do. That's why you are so jealous of us atheists. You see us acting and saying things according to what we want and you wish that you could do the same but you cannot because your god delusion has a death-grip on you.

So, do and say as you think you have to to keep your imaginary friend happy, Sarah. Just know that our hopes and good-wishes are with you. And even though we know that you are wasting your life and you probably won't even realize how much more fulfilling your life could have been and then it'd be too late and you'd be dead, we realize that its your life and you are free to destroy it as you please. I hope that you come to reason soon, before its too late and you're dead.

I wish I could kudos that post more than once!

Quote:Of course, survival is my prime directive.
Telling people what they can and cannot do is being a commie as far as I'm concerned.

I think you have socialism confused with all out chaotic anarchy. Man, the people these days. By the way... never vote again.

(April 20, 2012 at 1:05 pm)sarah888 Wrote: Stimboyou seem angry, you cant correspond in a mature manner. You like a rigged game. Im not upset you do not understand nor comprehend, you muddle and you revert back to semantics to prove your point which is to refute and disregard any biblical hitstory.

Here is a message from Mr Darwin

message from mr. Darwin "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God” – Letters of Charles Darwin
Sarah

Seriously - what's up with all the bold tags? My eyesight isn't that bad (when I wear my glasses, which is all the time), even if yours is. Please knock it off; you're using up all the internet ink. And that stuff's expensive.

Something else I request you knock off: declaring that all your opponents are angry. I realise that by making it seem as though you are being cool and rational while I am all emotionally unstable, you can come across as having the intellectual high ground, if only in what it must please you to call your own mind. As I'm sure others would agree, there is nothing in my previous post which ought to indicate any emotional state, positive or negative. Admittedly I do employ irony, litotes, absurd metaphor and other rhetorical devices but these are, in general, purely for comic effect to throw the subject into sharp relief. In my previous post, I responded to your assertions as comprehensively as I felt able at that time. If your only response is a perfect, even textbook, ad hominem - attacking me and my character in place of addressing any part of the points I raised - then I'm afraid it's you who can't correspond in a mature manner and everyone can see it.

Everything else you crapped out is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand, particularly since I never touched on the subject of biblical "hitstory". And I am never impressed by mined quotes.

(April 20, 2012 at 2:15 pm)genkaus Wrote:

(April 20, 2012 at 1:05 pm)sarah888 Wrote: you seem angry, you cant correspond in a mature manner. You like a rigged game. Im not upset you do not understand nor comprehend, you muddle and you revert back to semantics to prove your point which is to refute and disregard any biblical hitstory.

Here is a message from Mr Darwin[/b]

message from mr. Darwin "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God” – Letters of Charles Darwin [/b]

Sarah

Oh Sarah, is your last name, by any chance, Palin?

It seems that you are so stupid that you don't even understand how a conversation works. You are just shitting the same crap across threads without even once responding to the points made by others.

If there is a god, then you should hate him for making you so dumb, for not even giving you basic grammar skills or any knowledge of how reality works. In fact, he didn't even give you enough to differentiate between fact and fiction. Oh, and apparently, he gave you bad eyesight as well.

Maybe that's why you are so angry all the time. You are the one who is actually angry at god.

Yes, I know, you are going to say that you are not angry at god and you love him and he loves you and he is wonderful and blah, blah, blah. I understand your position and I sympathize with you.

I understand that you cannot say what you are actually feeling. I understand that you cannot even bear to think it, because you are so afraid of how god will fuck you up if you do. That's why you are so jealous of us atheists. You see us acting and saying things according to what we want and you wish that you could do the same but you cannot because your god delusion has a death-grip on you.

So, do and say as you think you have to to keep your imaginary friend happy, Sarah. Just know that our hopes and good-wishes are with you. And even though we know that you are wasting your life and you probably won't even realize how much more fulfilling your life could have been and then it'd be too late and you'd be dead, we realize that its your life and you are free to destroy it as you please. I hope that you come to reason soon, before its too late and you're dead.

Putting God aside, as a human you are showing your morals and values.
you have to name call to prove your point, which lacks intellect on your part, you may not agree but at least be respectful. Play nice.

Sarah

---

(April 20, 2012 at 1:41 pm)Faith No More Wrote: Debate? Asserting things with no evidence is not a debate.

Then how do you assert or speculate there is no GOD.??


Sarah

sarah888 Wrote:Then how do you assert or speculate there is no GOD.??

I do not assert there is no god. I just do not believe in one due to the lack of evidence in the same way I do not believe in psychic powers.

(April 20, 2012 at 9:45 pm)Stimbo Wrote:

(April 20, 2012 at 1:05 pm)sarah888 Wrote: Stimboyou seem angry, you cant correspond in a mature manner. You like a rigged game. Im not upset you do not understand nor comprehend, you muddle and you revert back to semantics to prove your point which is to refute and disregard any biblical hitstory.

Here is a message from Mr Darwin

message from mr. Darwin "In my most extreme fluctuations I have never been an Atheist in the sense of denying the existence of a God” – Letters of Charles Darwin
Sarah

Seriously - what's up with all the bold tags? My eyesight isn't that bad (when I wear my glasses, which is all the time), even if yours is. Please knock it off; you're using up all the internet ink. And that stuff's expensive.

Something else I request you knock off: declaring that all your opponents are angry. I realise that by making it seem as though you are being cool and rational while I am all emotionally unstable, you can come across as having the intellectual high ground, if only in what it must please you to call your own mind. As I'm sure others would agree, there is nothing in my previous post which ought to indicate any emotional state, positive or negative. Admittedly I do employ irony, litotes, absurd metaphor and other rhetorical devices but these are, in general, purely for comic effect to throw the subject into sharp relief. In my previous post, I responded to your assertions as comprehensively as I felt able at that time. If your only response is a perfect, even textbook, ad hominem - attacking me and my character in place of addressing any part of the points I raised - then I'm afraid it's you who can't correspond in a mature manner and everyone can see it.

Everything else you crapped out is totally irrelevant to the issue at hand, particularly since I never touched on the subject of biblical "hitstory". And I am never impressed by mined quotes.

I respect everyones views on the topic at hand, however I dont agree with them, just as you do not agree with me. Its just a simple debate.! You do NOT believe in God and I do. I dont use name calling as a correspondence and or acknowledgement to anyone here,
when I respond I am respectful . I dont go around spewing "Crap" or name-calling. Thank you

Sarah

(April 23, 2012 at 10:12 am)sarah888 Wrote: I respect everyones views on the topic at hand, however I dont agree with them, just as you do not agree with me. Its just a simple debate.! You do NOT believe in God and I do. I dont use name calling as a correspondence and or acknowledgement to anyone here,
when I respond I am respectful . I dont go around spewing "Crap" or name-calling. Thank you

Sarah

It doesn't look like a debate to me. It appears that you haven't really been replying to the people who actually took the time to do so to you and are just moaning about people calling you names.

If you are here to debate then fucking do it already.

(April 23, 2012 at 10:12 am)sarah888 Wrote: I respect everyones views on the topic at hand, however I dont agree with them, just as you do not agree with me.

Thing is Sarah if a belief is stupid. I will call the belief stupid and most of the other posters here would also. I can't answer for them but I do understand and respect your right to have the belief you do but I and most of the other posters here will not respect it because it's stupid.