Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 30, 2024, 2:53 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question for our resident creationist(s)
#81
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 1:52 am)ronedee Wrote:
(August 18, 2013 at 12:49 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: See, I love it when people who have no fucking clue what the fuck they're talking about try to pretend like they know what they're talking about.

HERETIC.

..."mounting evidence" of water on other planets? Oh, really.

You'd better start up your space probe, and get your divining rod out.... because, besides "trace amounts of vapor & gas" water only exists on earth.

And there is no "clear reasons" how or why:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_water_on_Earth

http://www.icr.org/earths-water/

Jesus fucking CHRIST. You didn't even bother looking up water outside of Earth. Nor did you bother picking up an astronomy book ever, apparently.
Reply
#82
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 11:11 am)Psykhronic Wrote:
(August 19, 2013 at 1:52 am)ronedee Wrote: ..."mounting evidence" of water on other planets? Oh, really.

You'd better start up your space probe, and get your divining rod out.... because, besides "trace amounts of vapor & gas" water only exists on earth.

And there is no "clear reasons" how or why:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin_of_water_on_Earth

http://www.icr.org/earths-water/

Jesus fucking CHRIST. You didn't even bother looking up water outside of Earth. Nor did you bother picking up an astronomy book ever, apparently.



LOL only exists on earth? I love sweeping statements that include places we have not even been to yet, like 99.999% of the universe...

Do you think the guy saying that knows that Mars has a ice cap on it? Or that the rover discovery has all but proved water was once I mars. The only thing that rover has not yet done is actually found liquid water to run over... While there may not be drinking water currently liquid on mars I don't think anyone but those most staunch skeptical astrophysicists would argue that was exists outside of the earth.

While this link is not 100% proof it sure is more than some guy saying he is smarter than every person who lives and has ever lived...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/17...10764.html


By the way the water on earth came from the same place hydrogen and uranium came from...the stars. They are everything that is and could one day be in some distant place. Don't think for a second that we have even found half of the base elements the universe is made from. We are just to young still to have gotten out there enough to actually see what is really in space for ourselves. Telescopes and rovers only get you so far.


Stars stars stars. All life started as stars. all elements started as stars. Big bang theories aside all human life is the result of a super nova event in the relatively short past cosmically.
Reply
#83
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 10:35 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: Refute this if you really think you can, but clearly I spent far more time paying attention in high school than you did. Little less time reading up on mindless, brain-numbing psalms, less time making Hail-Marys, more time paying attention to shit that has been scientifically established as fundamental elements of the universe around us. If your goal is to not get laughed out of the room by anyone with any semblance of education on the topic, then I advise you to actually pay attention to things that aren't just spoon-fed to you by a bunch of 40+-year old virgins who want to make you as miserable as they are.

Look... I appreciate your time and energy spent writing all this down for me.

But, the fact remains that its all theory.

And I should've clarified earlier that I meant the miracle is that water is here on earth in abundance. Not that it exsists at all.

But, the frustration of trying to prove a point that is based on theory is the point I'm making here.

I really don't give a rats posterior about theory until its law! Its fun to watch but could blow-up in your face at any moment.

Until then, you are in my position of arguing observations by men, and your passion about [believing] it true.

I'll take the atheists platform here: "There isn't enough evidence to convince me." When you can prove your point(s) beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'll believe you, and the scientific community."

But, this is just stuff written in books based on: observation, hypothosis, and theory. It NOT LAW... Yet. And no amount of you screaming and swearing at me will change that fact. Or prove your theory personally!

Sound familiar?
Quis ut Deus?
Reply
#84
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 2:04 pm)ronedee Wrote: I really don't give a rats posterior about theory until its law!

Theories do not become law.
Reply
#85
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
You don't even know what a theory and a law are, Ron.
Reply
#86
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 1:52 am)ronedee Wrote: You'd better start up your space probe, and get your divining rod out.... because, besides "trace amounts of vapor & gas" water only exists on earth.

I already pointed to links and articles which proved your statement to be wrong.

but here's more

http://www.nasa.gov/topics/universe/feat...10722.html

Quote:Two teams of astronomers have discovered the largest and farthest reservoir of water ever detected in the universe. The water, equivalent to 140 trillion times all the water in the world's ocean, surrounds a huge, feeding black hole, called a quasar, more than 12 billion light-years away.

Quote: Hydrogen is the basic building material of the universe, created in the Big Bang. Oxygen is created by nuclear reactions in stars. If you put H and O together in the cold of space, you get H2O. There are enourmous amounts of water in space. In fact, nearly all of the oxygen in space is in the form of water or carbon monoxide. Similarly, most the carbon and nitrogen in space are also in their most hydorgenated forms: methane (CH4) and ammonia (NH3).

http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/questio...number=195

But I guess no amount of evidence will sway your blinkered mind, be happy in your self imposed delusion.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
#87
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 2:04 pm)ronedee Wrote:
(August 19, 2013 at 10:35 am)Creed of Heresy Wrote: Refute this if you really think you can, but clearly I spent far more time paying attention in high school than you did. Little less time reading up on mindless, brain-numbing psalms, less time making Hail-Marys, more time paying attention to shit that has been scientifically established as fundamental elements of the universe around us. If your goal is to not get laughed out of the room by anyone with any semblance of education on the topic, then I advise you to actually pay attention to things that aren't just spoon-fed to you by a bunch of 40+-year old virgins who want to make you as miserable as they are.

Look... I appreciate your time and energy spent writing all this down for me.

But, the fact remains that its all theory.

And I should've clarified earlier that I meant the miracle is that water is here on earth in abundance. Not that it exsists at all.

But, the frustration of trying to prove a point that is based on theory is the point I'm making here.

I really don't give a rats posterior about theory until its law! Its fun to watch but could blow-up in your face at any moment.

Until then, you are in my position of arguing observations by men, and your passion about [believing] it true.

I'll take the atheists platform here: "There isn't enough evidence to convince me." When you can prove your point(s) beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'll believe you, and the scientific community."

But, this is just stuff written in books based on: observation, hypothosis, and theory. It NOT LAW... Yet. And no amount of you screaming and swearing at me will change that fact. Or prove your theory personally!

Sound familiar?


In science you are correct. Theory and law are two different things in science.


take from the site:
http://thehappyscientist.com/study-unit/...become-law

Laws tell us what happens.
Theories examine what happens and tell us how and why it happens.



Simple I know but it was better than my own words and very accurate.

yeah...
Reply
#88
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 2:04 pm)ronedee Wrote: And I should've clarified earlier that I meant the miracle is that water is here on earth in abundance. Not that it exsists at all.

So, blatant shifting of the goalposts aside, as you have known to be true for several days now, and as downbeatplumb and I have reminded you today, there is a reservoir of water in space that is larger than Earth.

How do you account for ignoring this? Are you being ignorant, or a liar? I really can't see a third option, here.

Quote:I really don't give a rats posterior about theory until its law! Its fun to watch but could blow-up in your face at any moment.

And now you parade your ignorance of working science! Cool! Look up "scientific theory" once in a while, hmm? Or hey, how about this: do any research at all before you deem yourself educated enough to speak on these issues, okay?

Quote:I'll take the atheists platform here: "There isn't enough evidence to convince me." When you can prove your point(s) beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'll believe you, and the scientific community."

The fact that you've said this after demonstrably ignoring real, observed facts posted against your claim just shows the monumental dishonesty you're employing to allow you to think you're being reasonable.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
#89
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 2:15 pm)gall Wrote: Theory and law are two different things in science.

It's also important to note that they are not part of a hierarchy. Theories do not, and cannot become law, and vice versa. Robust scientific theories are considered scientific fact every bit as much as scientific law.

ronedee will continue to pretend that this isn't the case, of course.
Reply
#90
RE: Question for our resident creationist(s)
(August 19, 2013 at 2:04 pm)ronedee Wrote: I'll take the atheists platform here: "There isn't enough evidence to convince me." When you can prove your point(s) beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'll believe you, and the scientific community."

wait wait wait, for your belief in god you use faith, which is by definition, believing in something with no evidence or evidence to the contrary. Yet for you to believe anything else you require absolute proof. Its like you are trying to be a hypocrite.
'The more I learn about people the more I like my dog'- Mark Twain

'You can have all the faith you want in spirits, and the afterlife, and heaven and hell, but when it comes to this world, don't be an idiot. Cause you can tell me you put your faith in God to put you through the day, but when it comes time to cross the road, I know you look both ways.' - Dr House

“Young earth creationism is essentially the position that all of modern science, 90% of living scientists and 98% of living biologists, all major university biology departments, every major science journal, the American Academy of Sciences, and every major science organization in the world, are all wrong regarding the origins and development of life….but one particular tribe of uneducated, bronze aged, goat herders got it exactly right.” - Chuck Easttom

"If my good friend Doctor Gasparri speaks badly of my mother, he can expect to get punched.....You cannot provoke. You cannot insult the faith of others. You cannot make fun of the faith of others. There is a limit." - Pope Francis on freedom of speech
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Creationist Equivocation Objectivist 28 4051 December 24, 2022 at 5:08 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
Bug The Voyage That Shook The World (2009) - Creationist BS masquerading as science Duty 7 924 September 8, 2020 at 5:32 pm
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  The Creationist that Ken Ham calls "stupid" drfuzzy 3 1937 May 7, 2016 at 8:23 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  A Creationist answered 10 questions . . . drfuzzy 26 8667 December 11, 2015 at 10:18 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  search Science Related topics Dinosaur Creationist: The Flintstones was a zebo-the-fat 24 5189 May 28, 2015 at 9:23 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Hope For Our Resident Jesus Freaks? Minimalist 2 1482 September 29, 2014 at 6:14 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Creationist Senators block fossil bill Bittersmart 119 27380 April 5, 2014 at 10:42 pm
Last Post: ThomM
  Pat Robertson implores creationist Ken Ham to shut up Gooders1002 24 5209 February 10, 2014 at 7:53 pm
Last Post: Crossless2.0
  If these resident theists really talk to god.. Brakeman 283 91612 October 1, 2013 at 8:47 pm
Last Post: Drich
  Do creationist know that what they are doing is wrong? Nerd 3 2149 March 24, 2013 at 9:33 pm
Last Post: Minimalist



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)