Hasn't even come out yet.
They have a rule against depictions of prophets.
Noah is considered a prophet.

And over here, apparently enough people like myself have objected to the re-writing of the story by the producers that they have added a disclaimer to it.

Will there be a brisk business coming to the M.E. in bootleg copies?

(March 9, 2014 at 3:43 pm)professor Wrote: Hasn't even come out yet.
They have a rule against depictions of prophets.
Noah is considered a prophet.

And over here, apparently enough people like myself have objected to the re-writing of the story by the producers that they have added a disclaimer to it.

Will there be a brisk business coming to the M.E. in bootleg copies?

And Ken Ham has come out calling it "Biblically inaccurate".

I wasn't planning on seeing it, ever, but if doing so would upset nuts like conservative Muslims and Ham . . .

Iran made a movie depicting a Prophet. Prophet Yusuf/Joseph specifically.

So the guys that believe a different fairy tale from the one you believe are banning a story from your fairy tale. How cliche, disagreement for untestable hypothesys. Are you surprised? We have history full of religious motivated wars, ffs. But indeed of you're talking about the free speech principles, then I agree they are doing wrong. At any rate, it is something that christians did and continue to do to this day.

Colour me surprised

(March 9, 2014 at 3:45 pm)Beccs Wrote: And Ken Ham has come out calling it "Biblically inaccurate".

I wasn't planning on seeing it, ever, but if doing so would upset nuts like conservative Muslims and Ham . . .

Good Ol' Ken was warned it was biblically inaccurate by the studio itself, which warned America of the fact. He's late to the complaint party.

(March 9, 2014 at 3:50 pm)thesummerqueen Wrote:

(March 9, 2014 at 3:45 pm)Beccs Wrote: And Ken Ham has come out calling it "Biblically inaccurate".

I wasn't planning on seeing it, ever, but if doing so would upset nuts like conservative Muslims and Ham . . .

Good Ol' Ken was warned it was biblically inaccurate by the studio itself, which warned America of the fact. He's late to the complaint party.

This is Ken Ham.

Facts bounce off him.

(March 9, 2014 at 3:43 pm)professor Wrote: And over here, apparently enough people like myself have objected to the re-writing of the story by the producers that they have added a disclaimer to it.

I would love to be the guy that got to write that.

"This preposterous movie is not an accurate representation of the equally preposterous source material."

Or how about, "If you think any part of this story is representative of any actual event in human history, seek professional help."

That's odd, because I thought that Islam accepts that there were 'many' prophets sent by God. Noah was a fictional character, so...whatevs.

Sounds like they object to just the depiction of prophets, only?

Its like trekkies fighting star wars fans.

(March 9, 2014 at 3:59 pm)Deidre32 Wrote: Sounds like they object to just the depiction of prophets, only?

Not all Muslims do. There was a series about Joseph/Yusuf who is considered a Prophet in Islam, produced by Iran.