(September 22, 2014 at 12:09 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Sorry about that I forget about the reply button.

Why I think this is because we have all sinned against God and therefore without Jesus we cannot be with God who is holy.

Well in that case how do you define holy?

I define holy as being cleansed of sin.

(September 19, 2014 at 12:15 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I have got evidence it is contained in the Bible therefore there is no point writing it cause you won't believe it. You still haven't answered my question.

The Bible isn't the evidence. The Bible is the claim (actually, a large collection of claims), which needs evidence to support it (them) before it's reasonable to believe it (them).

(September 18, 2014 at 3:05 pm)Chas Wrote: Just because planets are moving apart it doesn't mean there was was an explosion.

It certainly means they used to be closer together, you don't need any math at all to get that.

Actually it was much more like a very fast expansion than an explosion. The explosion version is the dumbed-down one. The term 'Big Bang' was originally coined to ridicule the idea, but it stuck, even though the idea became better and better supported.

And it's not just the planets moving apart, it's galaxies, because space itself is still expanding.

(September 22, 2014 at 12:25 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I define holy as being cleansed of sin.

Your god is a nice one. He gave us the ability to sin... But no ability to cleanse ourselves.

And before you say 'but jesus'... My moral code does not endorse scapegoating as a solution.

(September 19, 2014 at 12:46 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: It cannot be replicated by humans because God is God and humans are no where near a powerful. Any way you cannot replicate life from non life.

So if we were to create life 'from scratch' in a laboratory, how would that impact your beliefs?

Has life been made from stratch in a lab?

If it did happen it would actually strengthen my beliefs because it shows an outside involvement creating he life, it wouldn't prove life happening by chance.

Wow. So you're using the fact that something hasn't happened as evidence for your belief, but then if it were to happen, it would STILL be evidence for your belief. This is how you play tennis without the net.

(September 22, 2014 at 12:34 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Has life been made from stratch in a lab?

If it did happen it would actually strengthen my beliefs because it shows an outside involvement creating he life, it wouldn't prove life happening by chance.

Would you feel okay punishing said life because it doesn't live up to your expectations?

(September 20, 2014 at 10:11 am)C4RM5 Wrote: As far as I know Christianity is the only religion to claim that God came to earth as a human.

Hinduism claims Vishnu did it nine times, the last one being the Buddha.

---

(September 20, 2014 at 10:21 am)C4RM5 Wrote: Generally I am quite a skeptical person, the reason I don't believe in aliens is because it is due to creation. It doesn't say in the Bible that aliens were made, therefore ot means aliens don't exist or they are just not mentioned in the creation story.

The Bible doesn't mention bacteria being made, either. It only mentions organisms the people who wrote it could observe at the time...plus unicorns, dragons, leviathans, behemoths, and, I think, basilisks.

That is why I said I am not sure if aliens do or don't exist.

---

All I said is that the Big Bang theory states life can around ny chance. Therefore if it was created in a lab it was not due to chance.