RE: John Armstrong With A Simple Challenge For Muslims
June 29, 2010 at 1:17 pm
(June 29, 2010 at 12:48 pm)mo3taz3nbar Wrote: what do you mean?
Let me explain what special pleading is.
"Special pleading" is a logical fallacy where a person asks for special treatment or a lower set of standards for a cherished belief that he or she would not accept for any other belief. It's probably the most common fallacy I see in apologetics, likely because it's built into the whole concept of "faith".
This is why I say that all religions indulge in special pleading. The entire concept of faith is accepting something in your own religion that you wouldn't just accept from any other religion with the same amount of proof. Christians reject the Quran, for example, but quote the Bible to atheists as if just doing so proves anything.
Common examples of special pleading that I see all the time when religious people argue:
1. My god is real. Yours is just an idol.
2. My scripture is history. Yours is just mythology.
3. My prophets told the truth. Yours lied.
Islam seems to take this common special pleading to a whole new level, for reasons I've previously articulated.
Quote:you cant start from this place(trying to prove did he talk to god or not) you have a book that claims to be the word of god you must examine it to see wether it is the word of god or not
who said that i am or any muslim rely on faith?(do you mean by relying on faith that we just believe without reasons?)
If any religion didn't rely on faith, it would cease to be a religion and fall under the domain of science. We could examine souls in the lab and figure out how miracles work. Neither the Bible nor the Koran would consider faith a virtue but rather encourage everyone to seek the truth for themselves, confident that the truth would bring them to God.
Quote:the Quran is the word of god not muhammed(pbuh) anything written in the Quran doesnt mean that he knew the prophets better than them
So if Allah spoke to Muhammad and cleared it up for him, why not do the same for the Christians. That would have saved 1000+ years of bloodshed and cleared it all up nicely for them, too. Maybe if Jesus would return and tell the Christians in Rome and Constantinople, rather than Allah, it could have worked out a little better. But you ask me to believe that Allah's best plan was to instead speak to some guy several hundred years later in a different land and that was going to solve the problem?
Quote:we believe that the bible still contains some of god word.but plz give me an example of how they use the bible to prove the legitimacey of islam?
They quote the Gospels because these are the only detailed accounts we have of Jesus. They claim that Jesus never claimed to be the Son of God (he did) and that he admonished his followers not to worship him but to instead follow only God (he didn't).
Quote:the people that lived during moses and people who lived during jesus you mean. but after that it was a long time and a lot of things happened according to islam they just started adding and removing things from the scriptures for their own benefit untill most of their scriptures was lost(the word of god is all preserved in the Quran)
Both Islam and Protestant Christianity rely heavily on the misconception that there was a "pure" set of teachings by Jesus that were later corrupted. Both groups claim to be returning to that.
In reality, there was a plethora of different Christianities in the first few centuries, all with conflicting ideas about what Jesus was. None of them bore any resemblance to Islam.
If Jesus did live, he failed to write anything down and apparently didn't make much clear to his followers, who evidently couldn't even agree on whether he was a mortal possessed by God (Ebionites), a higher god (Marcionites) or never existed except as a spiritual apparition (Docetics). By the Muslim story, Jesus hadn't finished flying off into the sky before Paul convinced a large number of his followers that he was a intercessor to God who should be prayed to.
If that's your idea of a "great" prophet, I'd hate to see what you think is a failure.