Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 16, 2024, 3:38 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 17, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: The first step in the scientific method is observation, as I said one species evolving into a completely different species (meaning unable to produce offspring) has never been observed.

Observation in a scientific context does not mean "I have to see it happen in order for it to be true". A scientific observation is the identifying of a phenomenon - apples fall to the ground, exposure to this substance causes sickness, species alive today are different to ones now extinct yet similar enough to be related etc. Having made the observation, the next step is to create tentative hypotheses to account for the phenomenon and devise experiments to test them against the observed reality.

C'mon, man, you really don't want to be Hovind or GMan.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 17, 2015 at 10:18 pm)Stimbo Wrote: C'mon, man, you really don't want to be Hovind or GMan.

No trying to steal the man's dream, Stimbo.

Besides, I think he's aspiring to Ham.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
That's like aspiring to be what pond scum scrapes off its shoes.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist.  This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair.  Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second.  That means there's a situation vacant.'
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
Never mind the fact that we have indeed observed speciation over time.

Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 17, 2015 at 10:44 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Never mind the fact that we have indeed observed speciation over time.

Just not in a way that satisfies the strawman of evolution that Huggy insists on using instead of the actual definition.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee

Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 17, 2015 at 10:51 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(March 17, 2015 at 10:44 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: Never mind the fact that we have indeed observed speciation over time.

Just not in a way that satisfies the strawman of evolution that Huggy insists on using instead of the actual definition.

Crap, I totally forgot that he is the judge of all that is sound and scientific. And it's too late to edit!

Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 17, 2015 at 9:44 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:
(March 17, 2015 at 4:18 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote: It's so utterly ridiculous That I'm fairly sure he's trolling here.

I respectfully disagree; he really is a fucking simpleton.

Sorry but is he a simpleton, yes or no?

Oh...wait...
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 17, 2015 at 10:05 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:

Seriously? you Muppet....
Here is what I said.
(March 17, 2015 at 2:44 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: meaning "speciation" is just a genetic variation of the same species, that are isolated from breeding with each other.
And your definition.
Quote:noun, Biology
1. the formation of new species as a result of geographic, physiological, anatomical, or behavioral factors that prevent previously interbreeding populations from breeding with each other.

According to YOUR definition, to be considered a new species interbreeding must be prevented by one of four factors, geographic, ( polar and brown bears) OR physiological, OR anatomical(Great Dane and Chihuahua) OR behavioral (tree frog example). It doesn't even require the caveat of differing genetically. Again how is that different from what I said?

I, on the other hand I've made it very clear that I DO NOT consider that to define a different species, because by that same definition a Masai warrior in Africa is isolated from intermixing GEOGRAPHICALLY, with the hill tribes of Vietnam, yet they aren't considered a different species. Also you could make a case for different groups of people not intermixing behaviorally. So explain how YOUR definition excludes Humans?

[Image: 417-15.jpg]
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
ROFL!
ROFLOL
I have a day off and miss this? Anyone wondering how deep a hole this moron can dig himself into?
The world according to Huggy:
[Image: square-earth-map-640.jpg]
Quote:I don't understand why you'd come to a discussion forum, and then proceed to reap from visibility any voice that disagrees with you. If you're going to do that, why not just sit in front of a mirror and pat yourself on the back continuously?
-Esquilax

Evolution - Adapt or be eaten.
Reply
RE: The Jesus Freaks Will Hate This
(March 18, 2015 at 6:08 am)Huggy74 Wrote: According to YOUR definition, to be considered a new species interbreeding must be prevented by one of four factors, geographic, ( polar and brown bears) OR physiological, OR anatomical(Great Dane and Chihuahua) OR behavioral (tree frog example). It doesn't even require the caveat of differing genetically. Again how is that different from what I said?

I, on the other hand I've made it very clear that I DO NOT consider that to define a different species, because by that same definition a Masai warrior in Africa is isolated from intermixing GEOGRAPHICALLY, with the hill tribes of Vietnam, yet they aren't considered a different species. Also you could make a case for different groups of people not intermixing behaviorally. So explain how YOUR definition excludes Humans?

You are real close to understanding Huggy. Look at the variety within the human species that resulted from geographic isolation in a relatively short amount of time. Is it really inconceivable to you that continuing the population isolation for a couple million years would result in speciation?
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  You think Catholics hate Charles Goodyear Woah0 7 1537 August 28, 2022 at 5:43 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Xtians Will Hate This. Minimalist 34 3834 December 3, 2018 at 12:39 am
Last Post: T0 Th3 M4X
  Why are Christians so full of hate? I_am_not_mafia 183 23215 October 18, 2018 at 7:50 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Propaganda Films and Hate Speech Astonished 41 15229 August 1, 2017 at 11:16 am
Last Post: Astonished
  It Must Just Kill The Jesus Freaks. Minimalist 10 3060 March 31, 2017 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: vorlon13
  hate the sin, love the sinner mcolafson 101 16941 September 5, 2016 at 11:19 am
Last Post: LostLocke
  The Poor Fucking Jesus Freaks... Minimalist 102 15929 April 22, 2016 at 11:46 pm
Last Post: TheRocketSurgeon
  the real reason creationists hate evolution? drfuzzy 22 8558 October 6, 2015 at 11:39 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  NdGT makes some Twitter Jokes...Jesus Freaks Minimalist 13 3750 December 27, 2014 at 11:02 pm
Last Post: dyresand
  In Christianity, Does Jesus' Soul Have Anything To Do With Why Jesus Is God? JesusIsGod7 18 7821 October 7, 2014 at 12:58 pm
Last Post: JesusHChrist



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)