Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 24, 2024, 6:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
#81
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
the maintenance of civilisation provides "value" to life, as the collaboration of it`s various participants sets value on these participants.
Reply
#82
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
Way to drive right through being called on such obvious BS. There have to be trees for there to be a forest.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#83
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
(November 14, 2012 at 3:03 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: the maintenance of civilisation provides "value" to life, as the collaboration of it`s various participants sets value on these participants.

If this is true, than any man outside of civilization has no value.

But this is clearly not the case.
Reply
#84
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
Only if civilization were the only avenue to value Vinny.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#85
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
TGAC mentions only civilization. Do you disagree with him?
Reply
#86
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
Doesn't matter if I do, you excluded any other avenues for reasons you did not state in criticizing the one he -did- mention. Did he state that civilization was the only avenue to value Vinny? I don't see that he did.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#87
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
If when talking about people who exclude themselces from civilisation you mean the redneck fool who chooses to live in the forest or the tinfoil homeless guy - you are nitpicking.
Reply
#88
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
(November 14, 2012 at 9:33 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: If when talking about people who exclude themselces from civilisation you mean the redneck fool who chooses to live in the forest or the tinfoil homeless guy - you are nitpicking.

Not at all.

Your claim makes the value of human life dependent on civilization. So if civilization is not maintained, then people are justified in devaluing human life.

Your position fails to accomplish its intended goal: to preserve the value of human life.

Do you have any other appeal to make to rescue your position?
Reply
#89
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
Jep. Civilisation is maintained.


To argue that human life is worth nothing "when civilisation fails" is useless theoreticising over things which do not matter.

When will civilisation no longer be maintained?

After global warming, when I can book a scubadiving tour of Holland? When zombies roam the planet? When nuclear war comes? When the nazis resurect a cyborg Göring? When the Borg attack? After the Chinese have enslaved us? When the Germans are coming?

Should any of these or other apocalyptic event occure, I shall consider the concept of social darwinism to save my own ass.
Reply
#90
RE: Social Darwinism: Right or Wrong
(November 20, 2012 at 7:52 pm)The_Germans_are_coming Wrote: Jep. Civilisation is maintained.


To argue that human life is worth nothing "when civilisation fails" is useless theoreticising over things which do not matter.

When will civilisation no longer be maintained?

After global warming, when I can book a scubadiving tour of Holland? When zombies roam the planet? When nuclear war comes? When the nazis resurect a cyborg Göring? When the Borg attack? After the Chinese have enslaved us? When the Germans are coming?

Should any of these or other apocalyptic event occure, I shall consider the concept of social darwinism to save my own ass.

As long as civilization can conceivable be in a state of "non-maintenance", human value, according to you can conceivably be worth the same as dog feces.

This unfortunate "theoreticising" is the inconvenient truth of ascribing meaningless value to human life. We are all just matter, nothing more.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sexual Abuse in Social Context: Clergy and other (Secular) Professionals. Nishant Xavier 61 5743 July 16, 2023 at 1:54 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  We atheists now have our own social network rado84 16 2201 August 12, 2021 at 7:51 am
Last Post: vulcanlogician
Information [Serious] How many reasonable solutions are there to any particular social issue? Prof.Lunaphiles 69 9793 April 11, 2020 at 8:55 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  What is wrong with theistic beliefs? Whateverist 65 8840 November 30, 2018 at 5:04 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Argument from "You did it wrong" zipperpull 13 2320 May 23, 2018 at 4:04 pm
Last Post: Simon Moon
  Social void & questions rskovride 3 1499 March 7, 2018 at 11:24 pm
Last Post: rskovride
  Using the word "believe" wrong... maestroanth 8 2271 June 25, 2016 at 9:47 pm
Last Post: SteveII
  Responding to "Homosexuality is wrong, the same way incest is wrong" JewishAthiest 106 28291 February 9, 2016 at 3:48 pm
Last Post: robvalue
  The acts of Virtues derive from a Soul or social obligation? CristW 6 2583 September 11, 2015 at 3:06 pm
Last Post: CristW
  Social Contracts Exian 6 1999 July 11, 2015 at 1:59 am
Last Post: Redbeard The Pink



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)