Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 4, 2024, 6:51 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I'm glad someone seems to have built a containment field around this thread. His Travesty is only posting here, hence not contaminating other threads.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 5:45 pm)dyresand Wrote:
(December 17, 2014 at 5:41 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: You're the vulgarian, you fuck.

[Image: tommy-lee-wtf-meme-generator-i-m-sorry-b...200&crop=1]


Besides A Fish Called Wanda, one of the funniest films ever? No. Carry on.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 5:49 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:
(December 17, 2014 at 5:45 pm)dyresand Wrote: [Image: tommy-lee-wtf-meme-generator-i-m-sorry-b...200&crop=1]


Besides A Fish Called Wanda, one of the funniest films ever? No. Carry on.

Okay thanks
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today. 


Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&amp;auto_play=false&amp;hide_related=false&amp;show_comments=true&amp;show_user=true&amp;show_reposts=false&amp;visual=true"></iframe>
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 5:49 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Besides A Fish Called Wanda, one of the funniest films ever? No. Carry on.

Don't eat the green ones. They're not ripe yet.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 6:20 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(December 17, 2014 at 5:49 pm)Crossless1 Wrote: Besides A Fish Called Wanda, one of the funniest films ever? No. Carry on.

Don't eat the green ones. They're not ripe yet.

Bananas?




Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:

"You did WHAT?  With WHO?  WHERE???"
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 6:30 pm)Beccs Wrote:
(December 17, 2014 at 6:20 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote: Don't eat the green ones. They're not ripe yet.

Bananas?

Someone else hasn't seen the movie. Big Grin
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 1:46 pm)LastPoet Wrote:
(December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: *user hat on*
Come on, guys... don't make fun of the guy... I admit it's fun and easy... but...
Let's be adults, here!
He's clearly heavily indoctrinated which makes his mind particularly incapable of processing what we say... and what science says.... and, well, anything that goes against the holy book.
Mocking just makes him close up and repel our point of view even more.
Who knows how much charisma he has in real life? Maybe he's the kind of guy that can gather a crowd around him and pass on his indoctrinated views... and his distrust of the opposite views.
But if he's shown that the opposite players are kind and warm people, he'll have a much harder time convincing himself and others that these opponents are "evil".

Mock the idea, not the person.

My eyes! They burn! Damn you pocaralho, couldn't you use a darker blue? Big Grin
náaaa.. didn't seem right! Tongue
Quote:On the subject, he shamelessly claimed to be an apologist. You see, they have 'be prepared to give an answer' as a motto and it tells alot about their credibility and honesty facing discussion. I have been here long enough to know what will happen, he will strut around claiming victory, whatever will happen from now on. You do make a point that thread readers can get something out of the replies given to him, but the goal post move, the disruption and being all over the place instead of focusing in the claim he proposed to prove on the title will dismay even the most interested reader. Given his arrogance, it is nothing to be admired about, that other users are venting their frustration. Pigeon, I called it. To try to play chess with one is ultimately futile.
One tries... one tries...

(December 17, 2014 at 12:58 pm)Esquilax Wrote:
(December 17, 2014 at 12:35 pm)pocaracas Wrote: *user hat on*

W-wait... if you only just now put your user hat on, how did you ever post here before now? If a mod hat indicates that the poster is acting as a mod, then if you aren't wearing your user hat, wouldn't that entail that you weren't a user at that moment? And non-users don't have active accounts, so...

I get the feeling this rabbit hole goes deep. Tongue

forumception!
Devil
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 17, 2014 at 2:16 pm)His_Majesty Wrote:
(December 16, 2014 at 10:48 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: They clearly didn't share the same will.

Based on???

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se...ersion=NIV

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?se...thew+27:46

(December 17, 2014 at 2:27 pm)LastPoet Wrote: See? Pointless.

(December 17, 2014 at 2:28 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Absolutely pointless.




Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I wonder if apologists could benefit from this line of thinking:

"Would I find it reasonable for me (the apologist) to be convicted of murder on the standard of evidence and arguments I am presenting? Are they that compelling and beyond reasonable doubt?"

If you have any doubts that it's up to this standard, then you need to reconsider your case. It's important to establish things, not just suggest possibilities.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 18, 2014 at 4:35 am)robvalue Wrote: I wonder if apologists could benefit from ... thinking:

Fixed that for you.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 52 2754 June 12, 2024 at 11:01 pm
Last Post: arewethereyet
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 4882 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 8297 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 3411 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 3524 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1526 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 3727 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 2939 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16918 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2134 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 11 Guest(s)