Why homosexuality is forbidden in islam

[Cato]

Here's your link for the second the first is in the original post

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29760212

You're terrible at this so let me explain how this works. When asked to substantiate your claims, you are supposed to provide evidence that support your position.

The first link (the one from the OP) has nothing to do with homosexuality. In a different conversation, you didn't click on links I provided. This didn't stop you from commenting on their content though. Perhaps you think embedding links is just part of the ritual and the content behind the link doesn't really matter.

For someone in medical school, you display very poor reasoning skills and almost no knowledge of the scientific method. The second article does not support your claims. The article claims the study showed that 5-10% of the crimes within the study could be attributed to the warrior gene. What of the remaining 90-95%? Looks like the majority don't have the gene, which is the exact opposite of your claim. The article goes on to say:

But they stressed the genes could not be used to screen criminals.
Many more genes may be involved in violent behaviour and environmental factors are also known to have a fundamental role.

You would do well to take a close look at the difference between correlation and causation.

You quite clearly have a much higher opinion of your intellectual prowess than the evidence suggests you have the right to claim.
You simply have no idea what you are talking about and scour the web for something that even remotely resembles your ridiculous claims.

[robvalue]

Rhythm: There we go.

Mystery solved!

Sadly, to maintain the illusion of objective morality (I'm gonna make a video about that...) people have to either be, or pretend to be bigots now.

[The Grand Nudger]

..and thus, religion poisons everything...lol.

[robvalue]

Poison is so the right word for it.

Praise be to Hitchins.

[KUSA]

First being gay is bad for u in a matter of fact a gay person is at higher risk for diseases and rectal cancer

What if a gay man doesn't pound any ass but instead just enjoys having a penis smacked in his face?

[huss88ein]

Here's your link for the second the first is in the original post

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-29760212

You're terrible at this so let me explain how this works. When asked to substantiate your claims, you are supposed to provide evidence that support your position.

The first link (the one from the OP) has nothing to do with homosexuality. In a different conversation, you didn't click on links I provided. This didn't stop you from commenting on their content though. Perhaps you think embedding links is just part of the ritual and the content behind the link doesn't really matter.

For someone in medical school, you display very poor reasoning skills and almost no knowledge of the scientific method. The second article does not support your claims. The article claims the study showed that 5-10% of the crimes within the study could be attributed to the warrior gene. What of the remaining 90-95%? Looks like the majority don't have the gene, which is the exact opposite of your claim. The article goes on to say:

But they stressed the genes could not be used to screen criminals.
Many more genes may be involved in violent behaviour and environmental factors are also known to have a fundamental role.

You would do well to take a close look at the difference between correlation and causation.

You quite clearly have a much higher opinion of your intellectual prowess than the evidence suggests you have the right to claim.
You simply have no idea what you are talking about and scour the web for something that even remotely resembles your ridiculous claims.

Samw for homosexuality as tge genes contribute in only 20% of that orientation according to studies and the rest is psychological .

[robvalue]

What if he just liked being spanked by men?

[Mr.wizard]

The title of this thread is "Why homosexuality is forbidden in Islam " and then you link statistics and genetic studies. I'm pretty sure when Islam was founded they had no way of tracking any of these things, so to argue that those are reasons for Islams stance on homosexuality is absurd.

[Cato]

Samw for homosexuality as tge genes contribute in only 20% of that orientation according to studies and the rest is psychological .

What fucking medical school admitted you? There's no 'gay' gene. There may be hundreds of contributing genes, but there is absolutely nothing definitive, let alone prescribing a quantitative over-under on the nature/nurture curve. You may also want to brush up on your epigenetics.

You maintain a religious based hatred for homosexuality because you were taught to. All you are attempting to do now is rationalize it by scouring the internet for information that appears to support your position. The tough part for you is that you don't even understand what the articles you reference are saying evidenced by you making claims that are the exact opposite of what your references report. If you have this much trouble with articles, I'll conclude that a peer reviewed scientific paper would puree whatever is left of your mind.

Not that I have any real hope that you will click the link and understand its content, but I was compelled to provide you an example of a paper. Science, including medicine, use these to communicate findings and ideas. Your school seems to be an exception.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/668167

[jesus_wept]

May I ask what you think the penalty for being gay should be? Should we throw them off buildings, chop various bloody parts off them or just lock them all up?