(March 3, 2016 at 9:57 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:(March 3, 2016 at 2:34 pm)Drich Wrote: So... Allllllll this talk about science and you can't produce one instance, one scrap of 'evidence' to support this big wordy claim.. Hmmm, I guess to you when someone make an ad Hom assertion and backs it with nothing, you just blindly follow.. Or rather that is what your expecting those who read your post to do.
Bear in mind this is in direct contrast to my observation which cited actual science and a whole industrial practice (of Growing plants with out sun light) to refute the old atheist pillar argument that is supposed to pit God against 'grade school science/common sense.' which dry sand used in the OP.
Can you wrap your mind around why/how my statement; "The bible has a better understanding of 'science' than most of you do?" is supported by the evidence that I left concerning grow lights and subsequent plant growth. Is Indeed validated through 'science.' where as your personal attacks (ironically enough/because you are supposed to be on the side of science,) do not quote or reference any evidence to support your claims Of my "idiocy." rather you speak to stereotypes and atheistic prejudiced against christianity to rally support.
"Oooga-booga all christian, stoo-ped. they not know science. oooga-booga we decendant from common ape ancestor, we is science. Oooo Oooo they can not know science like we know science, Dey all sheep."
Without evidence sport all your eloquence, spit and shine amounts to little more than monkey man rantings.
You want to 'take science away from me' then use it. Definitively Show me how I am wrong.
Or do you have another monkey man rant for me?
You do this infantile, 9-year-old nonsense here because when we call you out on being an idiot, it's easy for you to chalk that up to your preconceived notion that atheists are stupid.
Xtians in general aren't very bright, and when they reject you as the idiot you are, DAMN!!! That must really hurt!
See, thats the irony of it all.. I'm the '9 year old' who has cited science and industry to outline and support my position. yet the claim, (Ad hom) has been made, that the atheist side of the argument s the only side that holds the only key to science.
To which I mockingly ask you to show me this key. I have doubble Dog dared you to use 'science' (really anything other than logical fallacy and ad hom/ad hoc speculation and attacks) to come up with something other than "if we don't like the message attack the messenger" Bill Mare type of rebuttal.. Is the above the best you all can do?
If I am a 9 year old who has shown you up using your own sword of 'science' against you, and left you no scientific footing to stand on, then shame on you for pretending to be on the side of logic, science and reason. Simply move on, do not get all butt hurt just because a cliche' atheist creation argument falls to a '9 year olds' understanding of 'science,' and you can't do anything about it.
