(March 3, 2016 at 10:32 am)Drich Wrote:bold mine.(March 2, 2016 at 1:50 pm)dyresand Wrote: 2. Then what's the point of genesis 1? If gensis 2 is correct remove genesis 1.Read the following carfully:
Genesis 2 ALL HAPPENED ON DAY 3!!! That means your out line in incorrect. Genesis 2 describes the creation/completeion of the Garden and everything in chapter two describes just what was created in the Garden, between Day 3 and Day 4.
So..... you're not even going to answer dyres question about the point of Gen1? Typical. Gen1 and Gen2 directly contradict one another. Why not just admit that you can't answer the question correctly instead of making up some bullshit about hydroponic grow lights.
History of hydroponics reference #1.
History of hydroponics reference #2.
Furthermore, the term hydroponics, refers to growing plants without soil. Hence, the word "hydro". "Hydroponics is a subset of hydroculture and is a method of growing plants using mineral nutrient solutions, in water, without soil. Terrestrial plants may be grown with their roots in the mineral solution only, or in an inert medium, such as perlite or gravel."
dripnuts[b Wrote:]I asked you to google the word hydroponics[/b]. In Hydroponics Grow lights are often used to germinate and grow plants in light other than sun light. Do you understand?bold mine.
You're an idiot. First of all, you don't even understand the terminology you used and then, to add insult to your own argument, you decide to throw the term "grow lights" in the mix. Hydroponics refers to growing plants without soil. You would have known that had you taken your own advice and googled it yourself.
Grow lights are a man-made invention. Your stupidity rats you out. Here, learn something for a change:
http://hortsci.ashspublications.org/cont.../1942.full
Quote:A Historical Background of Plant Lighting: An Introduction to the Workshop
Electric lamps have been used to grow plants for nearly 150 years with some of the earliest references being the work of Mangon (1861) and Prilleux (1869) (cited in Pfeiffer, 1926). As might be imagined, plant lighting technologies closely followed those used for human lighting, which took three general paths of development (Murdoch, 1985; Withrow and Withrow, 1947): 1) incandescent lighting, which was refined by Edison's invention of the incandescent filament lamp in 1879; 2) open arc lighting, which typically used carbon rods and became popular for street lighting in some cities in the late 1800s; and 3) enclosed gaseous discharge lamps, which were initially developed with mercury vapor in the late 1800s (Murdoch, 1985).
Carbon arcs were probably the first lamps used to grow plants with an extensive study conducted by Siemens (1880) that even included an economic analysis on the use of electric lamps for commercial plant production—a concept he titled “Electro-Horticulture.” Carbon arcs provided an intense point source with a broad, bluish spectrum and were still used for plant testing through the 1940s (Parker and Borthwick, 1949) but required regular replacement of the carbons and created hazards from their ultraviolet emission and exhaust products (Parker and Borthwick, 1949; Siemens, 1880).
Grow lights are used INDOORS, fool. If YOU would have googled the term "hydroponic grow lights", YOU would know this. Given that your gawd didn't construct buildings, I find your reasoning to be full of shit. See my above references. But in case you won't:
http://www.healthyharvestfl.com/blog/who...droponics/
While some credit is given to the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, clearly, no credit is given to your gawd, for the use of growing plants without soil. And again, you're misrepresenting the word hydroponics, as it, again, directly relates to growing plants without soil. Your entire hydroponics argument is false and is nothing but a really bad straw.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand.