BLM Violent Hate Group

[A Theist]

[...]
 To suggest that one people of color should be shot by the police to make things equal to another people of color was inappropriate, sarcastic in content or not. [...]

You obviously have no way of knowing that, but for anyone who - unlike you - is not a racist dimwit, it would be virtually impossible to perceive such a suggestion as a serious one. You, on the other hand, seem to consider racially motivated police brutality against people of certain ethnicity to be somewhat justified, therefore you can imagine someone else thinking the same about your own race - which is why you become defensive.

It's also quite telling, that you concluded, that I don't like white people, but not that I don't like women, even though I made the same sarcastic suggestion regarding them in the same post. Was that appropriate, then? Gee, thanks, Buffalo Bill...  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3grk-slP0LU

Sarcasm, or not, joking, or not, serious, or not, it was still inappropriate to suggest that any person of one color should be shot by the police to make things equal to people of another color. I caught the sarcasm in the first place. It was revealing of your disdain for white people.

Nope. I didn't leave out the women from your sarcastic suggestion, pages 2 & 3

Obviously, HN has an issue with whites, and since you didn't call him out for suggesting that the cops shoot a couple of white guys,  and "maybe a woman or two", I can only assume that you agree with his position. Is that something you agree with? Would that make things more equal for you?

No it wasn't. He was actually being dishonest. He emboldened part of a reply that I made to Homeless Nutter after he suggested that the cops should shoot a couple of white guys and maybe a woman or two, to please the egalitarians.

See. I included them too.
I think Wild Bill rather than Buffalo Bill would be more in line of the portrait you're trying to paint.