Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis

[Drich]

what a load of bologna thing to say. Buckster pour an hour or more into his post and you can't even be bother to respond to it topically... just a sweeping dismissal from the cheap seaats..

BOOOOOOOO! HISSSS Reset and try again

Not my fault that the deluge is so stupidly false, now is it?  I can't remember..are you also suffering under the peculiar affliction of believing that a planet destroying bomb of a thunderstorm magically failed to destroy the planet?  Or are you in the camp that asserts that the literally true magic book is wrong about that, and it was regional..and could you by chance point to a map...or...?

I believe what the bible says..

and I also believe to them there is no difference between what was known as the whole world and what is the whole world was the same to the man writting this passage. I also believe there is bookoo evidence for a literal world wide flood. AS THE BIBLE DESCRIBES.

In that there are three types of flooding (there are names I can't remember but can look them up for you if need be) but the first is like a Suomi where water if forced inland off the sea destroying everything and spreading crap every where. then you have flood conditions like rain and rivers over flow basically when water moves from high grown to low again it spreads sentiment and displaces debris every where. Then you have saturation which is very rare but some examples on you tube have been shown.. this is where ground water slowly leaches up no sediment or debris displacement. This saturation is in line with flood conditions. low area fill up fist so whe the rains cause the rivers to burst water is already there hence no displacement of debris or sentiment. 

Then we have whale bones in the deserts on mountains and even massive grave yards in deserts far far older than was supposed to have been an ocean. meaning dozens of whales bones found all with in a short/walking distance all from the same time when the desert was not or rather not supposed to be an ocean.

But again the way the passage reads "the world" was where man lived. the circle of the earth was used to describe the planet. but again there is evidence to support both scientific and litary takes.

I would lean toward a whole world wide flood just to piss people off even though I personally don't care, and neither or both don't change anything. because the bible itself as it is written makes room for both if you understand to whom and when it was written and consider how those original words had the flexibility to mean both