Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 13, 2025, 7:39 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Let’s get down & dirty - this post is hysterical - how arrogant this is - these specialists - are they controverted? - are these statements just there to “prove” validity - this is comedy in the extreme - dumb is often as dumb is said - am I having fun?

This is a common ploy that many fall for. The vital question is always this - what does primarily Biblical evidence & subsequently secondary evidence show - do you have any intelligible answer to this? These are not far-fetched questions or expectations to have an answer for.
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(January 23, 2019 at 12:42 am)donlor Wrote: The vital question is always this - what does primarily Biblical evidence & subsequently secondary evidence show

It shows the polar opposite of the things you indicated belief in. Brutal, inconvenient, but true....not that it has to matter, lol.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(January 23, 2019 at 12:45 am)Gae Bolga Wrote:
(January 23, 2019 at 12:42 am)donlor Wrote: The vital question is always this - what does primarily Biblical evidence & subsequently secondary evidence show

It shows the polar opposite of the things you indicated belief in.  Brutal, inconvenient, but true....not that it has to matter, lol.

you may lol because you have nothing to say - what is your point to be made - the burden of proof is on you
donals
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Biblical texts are evidence of nothing. Nothing at all, except what ancient literature looked like.
"History" (as was pointed out above) was not something the culture recognized. Even Rome, (far more advanced),
was not discussing the meaning of "writing history" until the turn of the millennium.

Reading ancient literature as "history" is nothing but uneducated ignorant American Fundamentalism. 

The editors/redactors/assemblers of ancient texts had no actual way to know what happened centuries before.

Genesis contains many syncretic elements from surrounding cultures, including Babylonian mythology (such as the flood myth from the XI Tablet  of Gilgamesh). 
https://www.britishmuseum.org/research/c...9&partId=1

DNA refutes the Adam and Noah stories, (genetic diversity and genetic bottle-neck). 
Science refutes the flood. There is no world-wide silt layer, among MANY other things. 
History refutes the Exodus. Egypt controlled the entire ancient Near east ... why go from one place they controlled to another they controlled ? 

Biblical Studies LONG ago moved beyond the literalism nonsense. It's childish and total ignorance of ancient Near Eastern literature.
Apparently there are some "internet amateurs" who never went to school, who think they are exempt from actually getting an education.
If someone is going to take the WAY outdated position that somehow what has been refuted by archaeology is true, and what the consensus of scholarship accepts as fact,
the burden is now on the literalist. We observe that NOTHING in our previous post was even addressed.

It appears that "Perhaps we both could learn from each other" was a dishonest LIE.
He came to shove his ignorance down our throats.
Perhaps starting another thread "The Bible for Third Graders" would be an option for him.
It's always funny ... these people think they know about their Bible ... and in fact non-believers know FAR FAR more about it than they do.

Now, where were we, before being so rudely interrupted ... the binding of Isaac.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
re  Post 534  
There are two types of science - observational & historical. Observational science has to do with more of what can be tested. Historical science can be much more tenuous. Most, but not all of it, is based upon testimonies. “History” has validity where & to the measure it is supported & validated by others. It relies on the testimonies of those who speak of the issue at hand. Is this correct? 
How am I to deal with the works of Aristotle, Plato, Pythagoras, etc? Do I take them at face value & contend with them accordingly - or do I just dismiss them as being irrelevant because they are “history”?
As I understand you, I am but one of those “uneducated ignorant American Fundamentalism.” type people. All I can do is but thank you for sharing your great wisdom & insights with me. It is touching that you care so much!
Now, about “The editors/redactors/assemblers of ancient texts...” how can you make any assertions about them? Were you there? How do you know what they did or did not do? Your statement seems just a tad bit presumptuous to me - but I hope that you will excuse my errors as I am just uneducated.
If “Reading ancient literature as "history" is nothing but uneducated ignorant American Fundamentalism” why do you even bother to speak of  Babylonian mythology? Oh, just to educate me - I get it now, thanks.
The following is from answers in genesis - “Dr. Duane Gish, in Dinosaurs by Design, says there are more than 270 stories from different cultures around the world about a devastating flood. This chart shows the similarities that several myths have with the Genesis account of Noah’s Flood. Although there are varying degrees of accuracy, these legends and stories all contain similarities to aspects of the same historical event—Noah’s Flood.”

AMAZING - you state “DNA refutes the Adam and Noah stories,...” but here again I beg your indulgence to my ignorance. I was under the obviously misguided conception theat the genome project had come to the conclusion that all of mankind CAN be traced genetically to one original set of humans.  

“Claim 5: The high degree of human genetic diversity refutes Adam and Eve as the initial parents of humanity. - What does the evidence say? The jury is still out on this one, but serious questions have been raised against Venema’s arguments. Geneticist Richard Buggs evaluated Venema’s arguments and found that they don’t necessarily rule out the possibility that humanity arose from a single pair. Moreover, when Buggs courteously but reasonably requested that Venema provide a scientific citation for his claim that humans evolved from an ancestral population of ~10,000 individuals rather than a short, sharp bottleneck of two parents (Adam and Eve), Venema was unable to provide such a citation, seriously undermining his arguments on this point. Biologist Ann Gauger looked at one of the initially strongest arguments against Adam and Eve from human genetic diversity (HLA genes) and found the evidence is compatible with our descending from an initial couple. ID proponents are actively working on population genetics models and simulations to test these questions. Venema’s suggestions that ID proponents are incompetent or unable to evaluate this evidence are simply false. Two peer-reviewed papers and a book chapter have already been published in the ID-community related to modeling these questions, and early evidence suggests that an initial pair is capable of explaining human genetic diversity. More work is forthcoming, but Venema’s conclusions about Adam and Eve are premature.”

“Claim 8: Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosome Adam probably weren’t an actual couple. - What does the evidence say? The evidence suggests that all humans trace back to a single female and a single male ancestor. Whether the molecular clock evidence suggests these two individuals lived at the same time is another question, although some Darwin skeptics (such as Reasons to Believe) argue that they could have lived contemporaneously. Whether molecular clock data is trustworthy enough to make a precise estimate on these issues is still another matter. For more details, please see “Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam, and Adam and the Genome.”

What would we expect to find from the Genesis account of the flood - layers of sedimentary rock with many fossils in them all over the earth.
What do we find on earth -  layers of sedimentary rock with many fossils in them all over the earth. Am I missing something?

Lastly, “It appears that "Perhaps we both could learn from each other" was a dishonest LIE.
He came to shove his ignorance down our throats.”
Actually, I was hoping to find some good arguments to contend with. That this has yet not come to be is not my fault. There was no lie or duplicity on my part.
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(January 23, 2019 at 1:46 am)donlor Wrote:
(January 23, 2019 at 12:45 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: It shows the polar opposite of the things you indicated belief in.  Brutal, inconvenient, but true....not that it has to matter, lol.

you may lol because you have nothing to say - what is your point to be made - the burden of proof is on you
donals

I'm not sure why you would think that.  You've indicated that you believe that genesis is literally true.  You've made a counterfactual claim on reality.  You appear to have done so because genesis is theologically important for you (and, you contest, all of christianity), and are unable to separate the theologically important details from the literary setting of the narrative.

The theological message, as you've noted, at least for christians......is that redemption is necessary because of sin.  The cross is just more symbolism - we don't actually need a cross.  Aside from being a counterfactual non-account of the world and ourselves..this isn't at all what the story was written as or intended to be.  Your christian notion of a sacrificial demigod is anathema to the culture expressed in the narrative. Nothing could have been further from the minds of those who authored it..than your hellenic paganism...lol.

Your views, and your views about their book..are mis-informed ...and... heretical.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
There is only one kind of science.
The scientific method does not have different methods for different things.

History is an academic discipline, with it's OWN rules. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_method

Quote:Now, about “The editors/redactors/assemblers of ancient texts...” how can you make any assertions about them? Were you there? How do you know what they did or did not do? Your statement seems just a tad bit presumptuous to me - but I hope that you will excuse my errors as I am just uneducated.

Of course they do. You are totally ignorant of the subject.
Reading suggestions : "Who Wrote The Bible", Dr. Richard Elliott Friedman
https://www.amazon.com/Wrote-Bible-Richa...+the+bible
"How The Bible Became a Book, the Textualization of Ancient Israel", Dr. William M. Schneidewind.
https://www.amazon.com/How-Bible-Became-...ent+israel
"A Reader of Ancient Near Eastern Texts"
https://www.amazon.com/Reader-Ancient-Ne...literature
"The Ancient Near East: An Essential Guide"
https://www.amazon.com/Ancient-Near-East...KPA2S44FFN

"Duane Tolbert Gish was an American biochemist and a prominent member of the creationist movement. A young Earth creationist, Gish was a former vice-president of the Institute for Creation Research and the author of numerous publications about creation science. Wikipedia"

LMAO. A BIOCHEMIST ... the very definition of the argument from authority fallacy.
There were countless LOCAL floods. There never was a world-wide flood, and science has proven that. There is no silt layer, and archaeology has excavated in countless sites around the world, and there is no silt layer or any layer that corresponds to that kind of flood.
There are countless other debunks of this subject .. I'll find them and post them.
Rocks and fossil layers have nothing AT ALL to do with what would expect from ONE world-wide flood.
I suggest you take Geology 101.

Quote:AMAZING - you state “DNA refutes the Adam and Noah stories,...” but here again I beg your indulgence to my ignorance. I was under the obviously misguided conception theat the genome project had come to the conclusion that all of mankind CAN be traced genetically to one original set of humans.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
Mitochondrial Eve lived about 150,000 years ago, and was THE MOST RECENT COMMON ANCESTOR.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_recen...n_ancestor
That does not mean she was the ORIGINAL common ancestor, and BTW thanks for telling us you accept the concept of common ancestor.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/artic...ked-liked/
Science knows the general mutation rates of various genes. They can CALCULATE a general time range.

Quote:“Claim 8: Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosome Adam probably weren’t an actual couple. - What does the evidence say? The evidence suggests that all humans trace back to a single female and a single male ancestor. Whether the molecular clock evidence suggests these two individuals lived at the same time is another question, although some Darwin skeptics (such as Reasons to Believe) argue that they could have lived contemporaneously. Whether molecular clock data is trustworthy enough to make a precise estimate on these issues is still another matter. For more details, please see “Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam, and Adam and the Genome.”

No doubt copied from a Creationist web site ... no supporting documentation. A mere assertion.
Adam and Eve were both figures in Babylonian mythology. We know where they came from.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rIlWKp44T50&t=209s

Thanks to goodwithoutgod, we have the flood myth debunked, with science.

The Great Global Flood myth
Egyptian civilization is probably familiar to most of us. Egypt’s dynastic history started with the uniting of Upper and Lower Egypt by King Menes, around 3100 BCE. The Egyptian period known as the “Old Kingdom” lasted from 2800 to 2175 BCE. During this time many of the pyramids were built. There is no record, written or archaeological, for a monster flood destroying and completely interrupting this countries infrastructure or it’s monuments such as the Sphinx, the Step Pyramid, or the Great Pyramids, which were built before ‘The Flood’. Neither were they wiped out.

China has a reasonably accurate history starting around 3000 BCE. According to texts from a Chinese book called “Shu King” and verified by archaeological records, China was undergoing a prosperous period around 2400 to 2200 BCE during the early Yaou Dynasty. They have no record of a cataclysmic flood interrupting their whole civilization and destroying the infrastructure of the country. Neither were they wiped out.

The Indus valley civilization has a well-known history dating back to perhaps 3100 BCE. By 2500 BCE there were two major cities, Mohendaro (or Mohenjo-Daro) and Harrapa, which rivaled Egypt and Mesopotamia in population and technologies. This great Civilization also encompassed maybe 100 smaller cities, towns, and villages, and didn’t fall until about 1500 BCE. They have no record of a worldwide civilization-destroying flood. Neither were they wiped out.

The Minoan civilization was probably as old as Egypt. Based on the Island of Crete, this civilization grew quickly and was highly advanced by 2500 BCE. By the middle of the second millennium it had an alphabet, used bronze tools, had pottery, textiles, advanced architecture, and had established cities around the Islands. It continued to grow and was a center for trade and culture until about the mid-1400′s BCE when it was suddenly destroyed by the violent eruption of the Thera volcano. There has been no evidence unearthed from this civilization that shows a flood destroying their whole infrastructure, at any time in their existence. Neither were they wiped out.

Trees that were completely submerged in salt water would have died, so when we look at trees that are say 10,000 years old, and not only did they live past the "mythical flood' but they show zero evidence of a flood. Can you find trees with flood evidence ? Sure, that shows there was a local flood, not worldwide, submerged flood that killed all life including vegetation. you are familiar with barometric pressure of course so you understand introducing that much magical water into our system would have wrecked it right? There is not enough water on or in the earth to cover the planet under 40 feet above the highest mountain.

The conventional flood story states that the flood waters came from rain that lasted 40 days and 40 night right? Rain appears when the atmosphere can no longer support water in the vapor phase and it becomes saturated. So normally, the atmosphere is on the brink of saturation, and the variations in temperature and pressure caused by weather fronts are capable of altering the threshold at which precipitation will form quite easily. What about the amount of water vapor suspended in air needed for the 4.5 billion cubic kilometers of water needed for the global flood? The water vapor currently in the air is only around 2-3% on average, with a maximum of 4% limited by temperature and pressure.

The change in atmospheric conditions required to support enough vapor for 112 million cubic kilometers of rain per day - about 120,000 times more than the current daily rainfall worldwide - would have rendered the air unbreathable.

Indeed, the atmosphere really couldn't sustain that much water even under the most extreme temperature and pressure conditions the planet can produce. If the conditions were right for that much water to be in the atmosphere, humans and virtually every other animal would have drowned through the simple act of breathing, as well as turning the earth into the equivalent of a pressure cooker with atmospheric pressure at nearly a thousand psi instead of the standard 14.7 or so that we have today.

How do you explain the relative ages of mountains? For example, why weren't the Sierra Nevadas eroded as much as the Appalachians during the Flood?

Why is there no evidence of a flood in ice core series? Ice cores from Greenland have been dated back more than 40,000 years by counting annual layers. [Johnsen et al, 1992,; Alley et al, 1993] A worldwide flood would be expected to leave a layer of sediments, noticeable changes in salinity and oxygen isotope ratios, fractures from buoyancy and thermal stresses, a hiatus in trapped air bubbles, and probably other evidence. Why doesn't such evidence show up?

How are the polar ice caps even possible? Such a mass of water as the Flood would have provided sufficient buoyancy to float the polar caps off their beds and break them up. They wouldn't regrow quickly. In fact, the Greenland ice cap would not regrow under modern (last 10 ky) climatic conditions. The fact that Greenland even exists single handedly refutes the flood.

Why did the Flood not leave traces on the sea floors? A year long flood should be recognizable in sea bottom cores by (1) an uncharacteristic amount of terrestrial detritus, (2) different grain size distributions in the sediment, (3) a shift in oxygen isotope ratios (rain has a different isotopic composition from seawater), (4) a massive extinction, and (n) other characters. Why do none of these show up?

Repopulation issue

The global flood story requires that only eight people were left alive in 2349 BCE. This does not allow enough time for humans to repopulate the earth. In 2000 BCE only 350 years after the flood the population of the world was 27 million. To go from a population of eight to a population of 27 million in 350 years would require a population growth rate of 136.07%. That is 133% more than the fastest growing portions of the world today.

The Bible also places the date of construction on the Tower of Babel roughly 100 years after the great flood. Saying a population could go from 6 people (Noah and his wife don't count, they didn't have any more children) to enough people to build the Tower of Babel as it is described in the Bible is absurd. This tower was so great that it threatened God, so it must have been greater that the pyramid of Khufu which took 30,000 people to build. Even a growth rate of 500%, which is absurd beyond all imagination, would only produce about half the required people to even begin to think about such a construction project.


The Ark

I won’t get into the issue of how pandas, and polar bears, and ants, and anteaters, and sloths etc etc all animals from all over the world from different continents somehow swam/flew/crawled across massive oceans to line up for the ark cruise…or what they ate, or where the poop went, or how they breathed from that tiny window, or how the different species survived from various climates and requiring specific foods. I will dabble into some building issues however;

Noah's Ark was a great rectangular box of gopherwood, or perhaps some combination of other woods colloquially referred to as gopherwood. Its dimensions are given as 137 meters long, 23 meters wide, and 14 meters high. This is very, very big; it would have been the longest wooden ship ever built. These dimensions rank it as one of history's greatest engineering achievements; but they also mark the start of our sea trials, our test of whether or not it's possible for this ship to have ever sailed, or indeed, been built at all.

Would it have been possible to find enough material to build Noah's Ark? When another early supership was built, the Great Michael (completed in Scotland in 1511) it was said to have consumed "all the woods of Fife". Fife was a county in Scotland famous for its shipbuilding. The Great Michael's timber had to be purchased and imported not only from other parts of Scotland, but also from France, the Baltic Sea, and from a large number of cargo ships from Norway. Yet at 73 meters, she was only about half the length of Noah's Ark. Clearly a ship twice the length of the Great Michael, and larger in all other dimensions, would have required many times as much timber. It's never been clearly stated exactly where Noah's Ark is said to have been built, but it would have been somewhere in Mesopotamia, probably along either the Tigris or Euphrates rivers. This area is now Iraq, which has never been known for its abundance of shipbuilding timber.

Whether a wooden ship the size of Noah's Ark could be made seaworthy is in grave doubt. At 137 meters (450 feet), Noah's Ark would be the largest wooden vessel ever confirmed to have been built. In recorded history, some dozen or so wooden ships have been constructed over 90 meters; few have been successful. Even so, these wooden ships had a great advantage over Noah's Ark: their curved hull shapes. Stress loads are distributed much more efficiently over three dimensionally curved surfaces than they are over flat surfaces. But even with this advantage, real-world large wooden ships have had severe problems. The sailing ships the 100 meter Wyoming (sunk in 1924) and 99 meter Santiago (sunk in 1918) were so large that they flexed in the water, opening up seams in the hull and leaking. The 102 meter British warships HMS Orlando and HMS Mersey had such bad structural problems that they were scrapped in 1871 and 1875 after only a few years in service. Most of the largest wooden ships were, like Noah's Ark, unpowered barges. Yet even those built in modern times, such as the 103 meter Pretoria in 1901, required substantial amounts of steel reinforcement; and even then needed steam-powered pumps to fight the constant flex-induced leaking.

Mythical Global Flood date IAW the Bible

I love when creationists posit that the "global flood didn't neccessarily happen in 2348 BCE"...Atheists don’t posit the mythical flood happened in 2348ish BCE…The date for the mythical flood is part of Xtian’s fable, we just deal with the myth as it is presented...for example:

"Paul, a university trained Jew, well skilled in the Hebrew language, the religion of the Jews and the writings of Moses, wrote in the early years of the Christian era, a letter to the church at Galatia (Galatians 3:17). He stated that the Israelites left Egypt to return to the promised land 430 years after God gave the promise to Abraham, the founder of the Jewish race.

According to Acts 7:4 and Genesis 12:1-4, Abraham was 75 years old when God gave him the promise and in the same year his father Terah was 205 years old and Abraham was born when Terah was 130 years of age (Gen.11:26-33).

The statements of genealogy in Genesis 11:10-26, are father-son statements and link Abraham to Noah’s son, Shem. The statements list the persons by name. Their year of birth against their father’s age is listed and their father is named. These chronologies do not have missing generations; there are no gaps.

If we add up the figures mentioned between Shem’s 100th year (Gen. 11:10) and Abraham (Gen. 11:26) we get 350 years. Since 9 names are mentioned it is 350 years ± 9 (9 margins of error of up to 1 year each).

Genesis 11:10 tells us that Shem was 100 years old, 2 years after the Flood had finished. When was Noah’s Flood? 1,981 years to AD 1 plus 967 years to the founding of Solomon’s Temple plus 480 years to the end of the Exodus plus 430 years to the promise to Abraham plus 75 years to Abraham’s birth plus 350 years to Shem’s 100th birthday plus 2 years to the Flood. The Biblical data places the Flood at 2304 BC ± 11 years."

http://creation.com/the-date-of-noahs-flood

Now I can eviscerate this "doctors" BS based on facts like...the exodus didnt happen either, but why bother. The point is, I have seen some variations, but all Xtian myth points to the area of 2300 BCE...which is what I said. Lets look at more delusion..

Our good friend Ken Ham from the Answersingenesis misinformation site says..

Calculated BC date for creation: 4004
Calculated AM date for the Flood: - 1656
Calculated BC date for the Flood: 2348
Current Year (minus one2): + 2011
Number of years since beginning of Flood: 4359

wait there's more...

"First-century Jewish historian Flavius Josephus used manuscripts available during his time to calculate that Noah's Flood occurred 1556 years after the creation of Adam. By adding the ages of the patriarchs listed in the Bible, other scholars have come up with roughly similar dates.

Irish archbishop James Ussher calculated that the creation of the world took place in 4004 BC. If 1656 is deducted from 4004 then the worldwide flood of Noah's time was around 2348 BC (if both chronologies are correct; but please note that there is some disagreement even among conservative Bible believers on these dates).

Josephus, Ussher, and other scholars disagree slightly on some of their dates. But most agree that a straightforward reading of the Bible indicates the Deluge must have taken place in the third millennium before the birth of Jesus Christ — probably between 2500 BC and 2300 BC."

http://www.creationtips.com/flooddate.html

Well what do you know...it would seem those that sell the myth, all seem to say it occurred around 2300-2400ish BCE....so when I say weather conditions haven't existed in the last 10k years to create Greenland, that would be check mate.

Literalism is total bullshit.
Now, can we please get back to the text in question, without any more of this Fundy ignorant nonsense.
Every religion is true one way or another. It is true when understood metaphorically. But when it gets stuck in its own metaphors, interpreting them as facts, then you are in trouble. - Joseph Campbell  Popcorn

Militant Atheist Commie Evolutionist 
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
Ah..but Bucky, once you've invoked magic..it serves as a catchall excuse for anything...including how and why a planet destroying bomb of a thunderstorm didn't..you know..destroy the planet.

I'll offer to work out the numbers for our resident book enthusiast if he feels as though disagreeing with his literally true magic book is the way to go, positing a local flood instead. All he needs to do is pick a point on the map. The water holding capacity of the underlying geology and height of the nearest contiguous water containing ridge will be known quantities...though I can say with certainty that pretty much every single point picked will fall to alluvial drainage, lol.

I guess he's gotta go find himself a really...really big bowl?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(January 23, 2019 at 11:31 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Ah..but Bucky, once you've invoked magic..it serves as a catchall excuse for anything...including how and why a planet destroying bomb of a thunderstorm didn't..you know..destroy the planet.

I'll offer to work out the numbers for our resident book enthusiast if he feels as though disagreeing with his literally true magic book is the way to go, positing a local flood instead.  All he needs to do is pick a point on the map.  The water holding capacity of the underlying geology and height of the nearest contiguous water containing ridge will be known quantities...though I can say with certainty that pretty much every single point picked will fall to alluvial drainage, lol.

I guess he's gotta go find himself a really...really big bowl?

what a load of bologna thing to say. Buckster pour an hour or more into his post and you can't even be bother to respond to it topically... just a sweeping dismissal from the cheap seaats..

BOOOOOOOO! HISSSS Reset and try again
Reply
RE: Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis
(January 23, 2019 at 1:30 pm)Drich Wrote:
(January 23, 2019 at 11:31 am)Gae Bolga Wrote: Ah..but Bucky, once you've invoked magic..it serves as a catchall excuse for anything...including how and why a planet destroying bomb of a thunderstorm didn't..you know..destroy the planet.

I'll offer to work out the numbers for our resident book enthusiast if he feels as though disagreeing with his literally true magic book is the way to go, positing a local flood instead.  All he needs to do is pick a point on the map.  The water holding capacity of the underlying geology and height of the nearest contiguous water containing ridge will be known quantities...though I can say with certainty that pretty much every single point picked will fall to alluvial drainage, lol.

I guess he's gotta go find himself a really...really big bowl?

what a load of bologna thing to say. Buckster pour an hour or more into his post and you can't even be bother to respond to it topically... just a sweeping dismissal from the cheap seaats..

BOOOOOOOO! HISSSS Reset and try again
Not my fault that the deluge is so stupidly false, now is it?  I can't remember..are you also suffering under the peculiar affliction of believing that a planet destroying bomb of a thunderstorm magically failed to destroy the planet? Or are you in the camp that asserts that the literally true magic book is wrong about that, and it was regional..and could you by chance point to a map...or...?
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 16225 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 32935 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 52315 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study DeistPaladin 52 7389 November 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Bibe Study 2: Questionable Morality Rhondazvous 30 4394 May 27, 2019 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: Vicki Q
  Bible Study: The God who Lies and Deceives Rhondazvous 50 8169 May 24, 2019 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 23783 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 4965 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 4012 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333
  Rewriting the bible part 1 - Genesis dyresand 4 2313 March 12, 2016 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue



Users browsing this thread: