re post 529
Sorry, you wasted some of your time here. We can all get “experts” to affirm both point A & point NON-A, so what? There is much written that I disagree with - likewise, much that I agree with. You know what they say about opinions!
I have no difficulty in considering that which I do not believe to be true. Quite often I critique myself - have I missed something - is there some faulty reasoning’s on my part, etc.
I have read some very, very stupid things from the “educated,” those with phd’s
I have never read the Interpreters Bible but it is known to espouse both liberal & conservative views. No commentary is authoritative - only the Bible. See how easy I make it for you.
“Here is a start on what archaeology has debunked.”
Well, this statement of yours is ridiculous. What have you shown to be an archaeological error on the part of the Bible? Nothing - nadda - zilch - zero
I know it is a lot to ask - but where is the Bible found to be at error as regards anything of a historical nature? Take your time - breathe deep - collect yourself - focus
“the Documentary Hypothesis”
“The Babylonian mythic origins”
as for an hypothesis & something of mythic origins - do you read what you write? What interest or point can be made from this stupidity - sorry to use the term - but that is what it deserves.
Sorry, you wasted some of your time here. We can all get “experts” to affirm both point A & point NON-A, so what? There is much written that I disagree with - likewise, much that I agree with. You know what they say about opinions!
I have no difficulty in considering that which I do not believe to be true. Quite often I critique myself - have I missed something - is there some faulty reasoning’s on my part, etc.
I have read some very, very stupid things from the “educated,” those with phd’s
I have never read the Interpreters Bible but it is known to espouse both liberal & conservative views. No commentary is authoritative - only the Bible. See how easy I make it for you.
“Here is a start on what archaeology has debunked.”
Well, this statement of yours is ridiculous. What have you shown to be an archaeological error on the part of the Bible? Nothing - nadda - zilch - zero
I know it is a lot to ask - but where is the Bible found to be at error as regards anything of a historical nature? Take your time - breathe deep - collect yourself - focus
“the Documentary Hypothesis”
“The Babylonian mythic origins”
as for an hypothesis & something of mythic origins - do you read what you write? What interest or point can be made from this stupidity - sorry to use the term - but that is what it deserves.
