Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: July 29, 2025, 3:04 pm

Poll: Generally speaking, is philosophy a worthwhile subject of study?
This poll is closed.
Yes
50.00%
9 50.00%
No
27.78%
5 27.78%
Neither
0%
0 0%
Both
22.22%
4 22.22%
Total 18 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[Serious] Generally speaking, is philosophy a worthwhile subject of study?
RE: Generally speaking, is philosophy a worthwhile subject of study?
Biological relativism is a descriptive theory of ethics with some observational support which states that all biological creatures ethical intuitions are shaped and informed primarily, perhaps exclusively, by the circumstances of their biology.

We would expect, if this is true, that the universal imperatives of any living creature would be represented in the ethics of every living creature. Killing otherwise ethical and healthy members of our own societies is sometimes seen to be justified. Killing ourselves. Finding this in any species, human or non human, would not be a surprise to us. We ould understand it in other species, even if we disagreed with it (insomuch as we do or may, someday).

(February 25, 2022 at 11:49 am)Angrboda Wrote: I'm not sure there isn't a parallel between ethics and math.  You say the aliens would come to the same conclusions in math if given the same axioms, well it's quite likely the same is true of ethics.  The problem with the alien test is that philosophy is about thinking and reasoning correctly, so if aliens think and reason differently, they're going to reach different conclusions.  

Maybe, but touching on the eastern western philosophy thing from before - there we have an example of different ways to think which still reached many of the same conclusions and was recognizable as a similar (if not identical) enterprise by groups that used those different methods. Biological relativism has been suggested as an explanation for that, actually. We found different ways to express ideas we shared.

-just to flesh that out more for you poly. A moral agent that eats will have food ethics. A moral agent that mates will have mating ethics. A moral agent that hunts will have hunting ethics. A moral agent that cultivates will have cultivation ethics. A moral agent that consumes any resource will have ethics pursuant to the organization of those resources, their distribution, possibly (or probably) their defense, etc. From relatively simple creatures that have the bare minimum of moral agency (whatever that is) to highly complex civilizations who cross the stars to ask us "hey, what the fuck is with the stuff on your body?" - if biological relativism is true, it's inconceivable that there would be no moral rosetta stone between any two such species.

We may not find it, we may even be compelled not to find it - functional or ideological xenophobia might be a part of the universal ethics of biological relativism as a product of kin selection, ofc.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: Generally speaking, is philosophy a worthwhile subject of study? - by The Grand Nudger - February 25, 2022 at 11:50 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Philosophy Versus Science Alan V 42 1118 July 23, 2025 at 6:48 am
Last Post: Alan V
  How worthless is Philosophy? vulcanlogician 127 18086 May 20, 2024 at 12:19 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Philosophy Recommendations Harry Haller 21 4421 January 5, 2024 at 10:58 am
Last Post: HappySkeptic
  The Philosophy Of Stupidity. disobey 51 7911 July 27, 2023 at 3:02 am
Last Post: Carl Hickey
  Hippie philosophy Fake Messiah 19 3022 January 21, 2023 at 1:56 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  My philosophy about Religion SuicideCommando01 18 4409 April 5, 2020 at 9:52 pm
Last Post: SuicideCommando01
  High level philosophy robvalue 46 8105 November 1, 2018 at 10:44 pm
Last Post: DLJ
  Why I'm here: a Muslim. My Philosophy in life. What is yours;Muslim? WinterHold 43 11847 May 27, 2018 at 12:20 am
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  The Philosophy of Mind: Zombies, "radical emergence" and evidence of non-experiential Edwardo Piet 82 17947 April 29, 2018 at 1:57 am
Last Post: bennyboy
  Revolution in Philosophy? Jehanne 11 3156 April 4, 2018 at 9:01 am
Last Post: Jehanne



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)