Quote:...but I was just gettin' warmed up.If Christians aren't able to create a definitive interpretation of what's literal and what's not . Then no the refutation works period and simply employing "it's not literal" is a cop-out.
Anyways, I am admittedly someone with minority Christian beliefs and somewhat unorthodox in my thinking. My initial point was only intended to say this. A refutation based on a literal interpretation only applies to literal interpretations. I agree it is valid question whether other Christian doctrines can survive without treating the OT as historically. I think it can but I don't think this thread is the place for that discussion.
"Change was inevitable"
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
![[Image: Canada_Flag.jpg?v=1646203843]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=cdn.shopify.com%2Fs%2Ffiles%2F1%2F0630%2F5310%2F3332%2Fproducts%2FCanada_Flag.jpg%3Fv%3D1646203843)
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
Nemo sicut deus debet esse!
“No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Will the good ones be reserved for the rich, while the poor women go to quacks?”
–SHIRLEY CHISHOLM
