Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 26, 2025, 10:39 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Genesis 1:26 is not implying God is triune
#3
RE: Genesis 1:26 is not implying God is triune
(August 12, 2025 at 12:27 pm)GrandizerII Wrote: Genesis 1

Genesis 1:26 Wrote:Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals, and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”

As you can see in the above verse, the plural pronoun "us" is used as the model that human beings are based on. Christians then latch on to this to argue that it is referring to the Trinity. But as always, that interpretation is forced, especially since the Old Testament doesn't outright state (or even imply) that God is a trinity.

What we do see in various passages in the OT are mentions of "sons of God". Not just in Genesis but elsewhere, such as in Psalms and Job. These are the ones God is very likely speaking to in Genesis 1:26.





Of course, Christian apologists are a clever bunch and have some stock responses to this latter interpretation. So one point to keep in mind:

Genesis 1 is not about the creation of the heavenly beings but the creation of the heavens (skies) and earth (land) and everything in them (and in the waters), so Christians who argue it doesn't make sense that God would speak to his creation about creation misunderstand the point of Genesis 1.

Now if any Christian is reading this and would like to share one or more counters to this, I'm all ears.

Apparently it's a special case in the Hebrew. 

The word Elohim there (אֱלֹהִים) when used for the God of the Jews, is a plural word that takes a singular verb and adjective. There are various theories as to how the grammar evolved. 

When used for other people's gods (e.g. the Egyptian gods in Exodus) the same word is used with plural verbs and adjectives. 

No doubt the translators of the King James Bible and others were comfortable with the "royal we," so they wouldn't necessarily interpret this word to refer to multiple gods.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
Genesis 1:26 is not implying God is triune - by GrandizerII - August 12, 2025 at 12:27 pm
RE: Genesis 1:26 is not implying God is triune - by Belacqua - August 12, 2025 at 6:22 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 28865 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 45373 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 127641 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 32080 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 6131 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 4957 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333
  Rewriting the bible part 1 - Genesis dyresand 4 2625 March 12, 2016 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue
  god is a moron - genesis dyresand 70 25642 August 7, 2015 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1 Theoretical Skeptic 25 9540 May 6, 2015 at 7:01 am
Last Post: Hatshepsut
  Footnote to Genesis 3:7 daver49 35 10711 March 24, 2015 at 6:28 pm
Last Post: Huggy Bear



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)