Colorado parents of transgender 1st-grader file complaint over restroom ban

[Tea Earl Grey Hot]

TEGH, it is not unlikely. Those gaps are massive in some places. I accidentally see shit all the time. I also suggest logic courses become mandatory for people who are going to pretend they know how to debate formally in this forum.

Let's see, I doubt any crack would be greater than half an inch. You would have get close to the crack and focus beyond it. Stalls aren't well lit. I really can't believe you've seen anything unless it was on purpose (which is not something I believe you'd do).

I've taken at least one college course that taught logic. I've studied deductive logic on my own as well from a book on logic. I've read at least two books on logical fallacies. Sure, I'm certainly not a philosopher and I plan (and need to) on studying logic much more in depth in the future but I'm not some r/atheism retard who learned a logical fallacy from a meme either.

Now the appeal to definition fallacy is as follows (taken from logicallyfallacious.com):

The dictionary definition of X does not mention Y.
Therefore Y must not be part of X.

Your argument is similar:

The men's restroom was designed with penises in mind. The women's room was designed with vaginas in mind. Therefore, humans with penises should not use women's and vice versa.

What you have failed to supply is why the intended design of something should be the final authority in all cases.

Aside from all of this, you have twice now ignored my request to explain why you think a girl seeing a penis is so harmful.