From Wikipedia: "The argument from ignorance, also known as argumentum ad ignorantiam ("appeal to ignorance"), argument by lack of imagination, or negative evidence, is a logical fallacy in which it is claimed that a premise is true only because it has not been proven false, or is false only because it has not been proven true."
So unless such a person claims that they must be right about God because they haven't been proven wrong, or that others must be wrong about God for not proving themselves right... then I guess they aren't falling into it? Unless I'm missing some implication from in your above post?
EvF
So unless such a person claims that they must be right about God because they haven't been proven wrong, or that others must be wrong about God for not proving themselves right... then I guess they aren't falling into it? Unless I'm missing some implication from in your above post?
EvF
