RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
January 8, 2014 at 6:45 pm
(This post was last modified: January 8, 2014 at 6:45 pm by Ksa.)
(January 8, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:(January 8, 2014 at 6:34 pm)Ksa Wrote: What? Are you unfamiliar with Brian Greene's multiverse theory? That this is an universe among many, like suggested by our extraordinary value of empty space density?This irritates me about scientists. They use "theory" in two distinct ways and then express frustration when the public misapplies the term ("Evolution is only a theory!"). Brian Greene's multiverse "theory" is a scientific hypothesis and requires confirmation by evidence to be anything more. That said, IF the Big Bang was the beginning of THIS Universe, my point stands unscathed.
Existence has no beginning and no end, this universe may have a beginning but it's just the event horizon, we know nothing else. If we spawned later in the future, we would have no measurable evidence that there even are other galaxies because they would have accelerated away from the event horizon long ago.
You're just dead wrong.
No, mathematical models predicted for the existence of Higgs boson long before it could be measured and discovered. You underestimate the power of mathematics, probably because you don't master it very well yourself. Brian Greene's calculations are mathematics and it at some point has to factor for several universes.
Of course, until it is measured and discovered, the math remains very abstract but you can't just discard it and treat it as religion because at least it is a highly logical deduction rather than a story being told.
![[Image: Untitled_1.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s7.postimg.org%2Fmvlqt55mj%2FUntitled_1.jpg)