Ramen, just post the points you'd wish to discuss, preferably one at a time so you aren't overwhelmed with 10+ pages of responses to everything, at which point arguments may be lost in the clutter. You don't have to ask for debate. You could have simply opened with your first post, plus "Here is the specific topic I'd wish us to discuss: the scientific validity of the Bible"
That's just one potential topic. You could want a debate on contradictions in the Bible, atrocities in the Bible, the possibility (or lack thereof) of certain Gods, the difference between your version of Christianity and mainstream Christianity and whether or not it is valid/consistent with the Bible (none can be completely consistent due to the mixed messages the Bible sends), the historical validity of the Bible, the validity of prayer...the topics could keep going. If you want a debate, you have to post your assertions. As a theological noncognitivist, I have yet to see someone ever coherently define what God even is.
That's just one potential topic. You could want a debate on contradictions in the Bible, atrocities in the Bible, the possibility (or lack thereof) of certain Gods, the difference between your version of Christianity and mainstream Christianity and whether or not it is valid/consistent with the Bible (none can be completely consistent due to the mixed messages the Bible sends), the historical validity of the Bible, the validity of prayer...the topics could keep going. If you want a debate, you have to post your assertions. As a theological noncognitivist, I have yet to see someone ever coherently define what God even is.
Live and love life
Liberty and justice for all
Liberty and justice for all