(August 4, 2010 at 12:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You can't have empirical evidence for faith, as that would contradict the model. You can have non empirical evidence, such as the entire bible, or experience based upon your assumptions.
And we get to the starting point yet again. You take assumption and arbitrary assertion and treat them as true. It's a good thing you don't treat other things with such a lax standard of verification.
"Yup, feels right to me!"
(August 4, 2010 at 12:03 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: Well you're not understanding the argument, if you believe what you said above. So I don't see how you wouldn't find it absurd. I would too.
So how do you distinguish fact from fantasy? Please explain if I misunderstood.
My blog: The Usual Rhetoric