RE: Refute a first cause which most people would call G-d AKA Deism
May 9, 2013 at 3:22 pm
(This post was last modified: May 9, 2013 at 3:22 pm by Jackalope.)
(May 9, 2013 at 1:57 pm)xdrgnh Wrote: Those not scientific evidence which is the kind of evidence I believe most people here are asking for. I gave logical evidence in my OP for a Deist G-d which no one has refuted yet. Scientific evidence is experimental results.
Your "proof" hinges on a non-eternal universe. You've asserted that the universe is not eternal (and therefore requires a first cause), but have presented no evidence or argument to support that assertion.
Until you do, please feel free to consider your argument refuted.