(July 11, 2016 at 8:32 am)A Theist Wrote: Sarcasm, or not, joking, or not, serious, or not, it was still inappropriate to suggest that any person of one color should be shot by the police to make things equal to people of another color.
And yet your first instinct wasn't to say that it was inappropriate, but rather to go for a non-sequitur suggestion, that I don't like white people and not even mention women, until you were called out on it.
(July 11, 2016 at 8:32 am)A Theist Wrote: I caught the sarcasm in the first place. It was revealing of your disdain for white people.
Bullsh*t. The sarcasm has nothing to do with how I feel about white people, Great White Hope.
(July 11, 2016 at 8:32 am)A Theist Wrote: Nope. I didn't leave out the women from your sarcastic suggestion, pages 2 & 3
Again - that wasn't your first response. Your first instinct was to stand up for white males, as if what I was suggesting was serious.
(July 11, 2016 at 8:32 am)A Theist Wrote: See. I included them too.
I see, that you didn't conclude I hated women. Why is that?
(July 11, 2016 at 8:32 am)A Theist Wrote: I think Wild Bill rather than Buffalo Bill would be more in line of the portrait you're trying to paint.
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw