A "meta-argument" against all future arguments for God's existence ?

[Deesse23]

If you come across a crime scene where a rape is about to happen, what do you do?

I will try to stop it OFC.

Why?
Because you like to infringe on the free will of the rapist?

If he were to negate injustice altogether at all times, this would jeopardize the free will of moral agents.
Allowing rape to occur is part of allowing moral agents to exercise their free will.

Please reconcile this.

But you seem to ignore that the rapist has free will too. If God intervenes to stop one rapist, he has no reason not to stop all the other crimes that are committed, and free will obviously cannot exist anymore.

Oh, wow, the mental gymnastics here are record braking.
You claim that you would stop a rapist, but your god would and should not, and your god is the moral superior agent!?      
Why dont you try to be "better", and like your god do not stop the rapist?

As already said: Letting the rapist have some free will does not equal to allow him to rape. I am baffled to have to point this out to you.

Is that your theology? To hold your god to lesser moral standards than yourself, so you can explain away all his moral failings?