What one thing would disprove Christianity to you?

[The Grand Nudger]

Wait, we can't find the "why"...except..you know, when we can, like when we figured out "why" we can't? We're going to move something into the realm of philosophy that you have just blissfully informed us cannot be figured out from within the realm of philosophy without committing a logical fallacy?

As far as sales pitches go, that was pretty dismal. If the situation you described was entirely accurate, you'd have burned all of your own bridges in the hopes to pile trash on the bridges of others to at least impede their advance, so bravo for that.

[pocaracas]

Exactly. The bias is to withhold judgment until a natural solution is found. That might be a fine practice in discovering how things work but science has never discovered a solution natural or supernatural why things work. Scientific laws are in the "why" category. Not only has a "why" never been found, but hundreds of philosophers have argued why it can never be found (it requires ending the chain of efficient causes as we know it--a logical fallacy). So why don't we move into the realm of philosophy for answers rather than holding out for the improbable?

So you propose an ultimate answer for the "why" question.... god, the immaterial conscious entity... which is a logical fallacy, if I read you right.

Why do people ask such questions as "why things work"?
Sometimes, although a question is correctly formulated, that doesn't mean that the question makes sense, nor that it has an answer.
A "why" question, as opposed to a "how" one, assumes some intent for the action... Intent requires some consciousness. How can there be such an intent if a consciousness is missing? If there's no intent, then the "why" question makes no sense.

[Whore Of Babylon]

The first passage in the bible. It reads like a novel. Not a historical account.

[fr0d0]

To the Christians on the forum: What one (and only one) thing would if shown to be true, disprove Christianity entirely for you?

An atheist theory.

[Cato]

An atheist theory.

That's easy:

God didn't do it!

Your conversion is now complete.

[Strongbad]

To the Christians on the forum: What one (and only one) thing would if shown to be true, disprove Christianity entirely for you?

An atheist theory.

All these years on an atheist forum, thousands of posts, countless responses, and he still doesn't understand what atheism is.

[fr0d0]

An atheist theory.

That's easy:

God didn't do it!

Your conversion is now complete.

Good example. To make such a claim would require your consideration of "God".

QED

[Ryantology]

We know the feelings come from God because they are not natural to the human psyche-- love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control. We don’t create them, the Spirit of God living within us does.

You left out all of God's favorite feelings: greed, hate, avarice, jealousy, angst, callousness, genocidal, mysogyny, homophobia, etc.

[Faith No More]

Exactly. The bias is to withhold judgment until a natural solution is found.

So, scientists are bias because in the absence of any understanding of natural mechanisms they refuse to entertain an untestable, supernatural hypothesis? I think you are confusing bias with intellectual integrity, which is that the lack of evidence for one hypothesis does not strengthen the case for another. Each must meet the burden of proof, and the fact that our current body of scientific knowledge lacks a natural explanation does not get the supernatural explanation any closer to meeting this burden. Therefore, judgement must be withheld until an hypothesis can meet this burden, which every supernatural claim has failed to do.

[Cato]

Good example. To make such a claim would require your consideration of "God".

QED

I consider Mary Poppins too. What's your point?