|
Evidence?
|
 (October 6, 2009 at 4:51 pm)zoso Wrote: There maybe lack of evidence to prove christianity There is also no evidence to disprove unicorns, dragons, reptilian overlords, gnomes, trolls, flying sheep, santa or the FSM... But wait... here's the clincher! There is NO evidence at all to suggest that the idea of God is any more credible than any other unproven belief!
.
 
H0ary H0bbit Religious Views: “Never to suffer would never to have been blessed.” - Edgar Allan Poe RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:23 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2009 at 5:24 pm by fr0d0.)
 (October 6, 2009 at 5:12 pm)zoso Wrote: fair enough you explain mypost to me in you logical explanation im very open for someone to explain it to me because so far im not finding one I'm not a geologist by profession. If you can't explain something, it is not evidence that your chosen deity did it. Can you prove to me that the "crack" wasn't caused by the hammer of almighty Thor?
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
 RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:27 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2009 at 5:29 pm by Violet.)
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
 RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:31 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2009 at 5:37 pm by zoso.)
(October 6, 2009 at 5:22 pm)theVOID Wrote:(October 6, 2009 at 4:51 pm)zoso Wrote: There maybe lack of evidence to prove christianity there is evidence to SUGGEST the word of god is correct there is also evidence to SUGGEST evolution is correct. but there is no proof for either. Evidence doesnt prove anything it only suggest. Proof is when you've seen it with your very eyes. I could tell you i have children and show you a picture of them. You believe me but it doesnt mean its true. You only hang on faith of the word spoken as you do with evolution and as i do with christianity. If you prove it yourself its certainly true If you dont demonstrate it then you hang on faith the crack has nothing to do with moses it is a suggestion to explain noahs flood. please read the post more carefully the crack suggests an explanation for noahs flood no the parting of the red sea in moses the crack goes approx 40,000 miles long why would it need to be for the parting of the red sea (October 6, 2009 at 5:31 pm)zoso Wrote: there is evidence to SUGGEST the word of god is correct Do I dare to ask what this evidence might be?... (October 6, 2009 at 5:31 pm)zoso Wrote: You only hang on faith of the word spoken as you do with evolution and as i do with christianity. How do you know that I believe that the theory of evolution by natural selection is valid? This is an ATHEIST forum. An atheist is simply one who does not believe in any theistic gods.
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day
(October 6, 2009 at 5:45 pm)lilphil1989 Wrote:(October 6, 2009 at 5:31 pm)zoso Wrote: there is evidence to SUGGEST the word of god is correct ok im sorry to assume you believe in evolution thats wrong and i appologise. would you agree that evolution is a theory and not evidence or proof? RE: Evidence?
October 6, 2009 at 5:47 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2009 at 5:48 pm by lilphil1989.)
(October 6, 2009 at 5:31 pm)zoso Wrote: the crack suggests an explanation for noahs flood no the parting of the red sea in moses and if you'd bothered to read Saerules' response you'd know that this "crack" is explained quite well by the geophysical theory of plate tectonics
Galileo was a man of science oppressed by the irrational and superstitious. Today, he is used by the irrational and superstitious who claim they are being oppressed by science - Mark Crislip
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
