Posts: 13901
Threads: 263
Joined: January 11, 2009
Reputation:
82
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 7:26 am
(November 27, 2009 at 12:21 pm)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: @ Sae
I understand faith to be belief without evidence. So to take evidence on faith, is incompatible with my definition.
Evidence is something that gives indication, that you take in. If there is such indication, if there is evidence, then your belief is evidence-based. If, however, you believe without any evidence whatsoever, if you take it on faith, if you just "have faith", which is blind, then your belief is faith-based and not evidence-based. And there is nothing more baseless, at least in my opinion, than faith-based belief.
EvF
Isn't believing something without evidence a stupid thing to do.
If I stepped off a cliff in the belief that a ledge would break my fall without evidence that the ledge existed... ok poor example but you get my reasoning I hope.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.
Posts: 1694
Threads: 24
Joined: August 28, 2008
Reputation:
22
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 8:33 am
Christ doesn't have a birthday because he never existed.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Yeah, CP, ultimately that is the answer.
Posts: 310
Threads: 5
Joined: November 27, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 12:07 pm
(November 28, 2009 at 8:33 am)chatpilot Wrote: Christ doesn't have a birthday because he never existed.
Yes, this is the answer, but it's still fun to see the absolute bullshit that the buybull contains. This is just another fallacy on a very long list.
Nothing is your own except the few cubic centimeters inside your skull. - George Orwell
Posts: 144
Threads: 3
Joined: November 19, 2009
Reputation:
3
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 12:27 pm
(November 28, 2009 at 8:33 am)chatpilot Wrote: Christ doesn't have a birthday because he never existed. Dang me, Chatty, you're right! So why did we have all this goddam argument? 
Only sheep need a shepherd.
Posts: 7388
Threads: 168
Joined: February 25, 2009
Reputation:
45
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 7:53 pm
Quote:Isn't believing something without evidence a stupid thing to do.
Not necessarily. We often believe something because there is no reason not to believe it,because "it seems reasonable"
I will accept a lot of things without direct evidence; EG much from first degree relatives. Past experience has shown I can trust them. [at least within limits I understand] I accept what they tell me on face value ,and act on that information,even though I may not have any proof. I think that's called 'acting on faith'
Human beings do it constantly day-to-day. When it exceeds an undefined reasonableness,one is considered 'gullible'. Many atheists here (including me) consider say creationists,conspiracy theorists, and people who give money to televangelists to be gullible.
Posts: 111
Threads: 2
Joined: April 12, 2009
Reputation:
4
RE: Christ's birthday
November 28, 2009 at 8:43 pm
(November 28, 2009 at 7:53 pm)padraic Wrote: Quote:Isn't believing something without evidence a stupid thing to do.
Not necessarily. We often believe something because there is no reason not to believe it,because "it seems reasonable"
I will accept a lot of things without direct evidence; EG much from first degree relatives. Past experience has shown I can trust them. [at least within limits I understand] I accept what they tell me on face value ,and act on that information,even though I may not have any proof. I think that's called 'acting on faith'
Human beings do it constantly day-to-day. When it exceeds an undefined reasonableness,one is considered 'gullible'. Many atheists here (including me) consider say creationists,conspiracy theorists, and people who give money to televangelists to be gullible.
This is also where "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" comes in. If someone tells me they can juggle with 3 tennis balls and is absolutely adamant about it, but there's no tennis balls around to prove it; I may be inclined to believe them. If someone tells me they can walk on water - my bulshit detector kicks in.
This isn't exactly acting on faith (i.e. the tennis ball example), its more a subconscious calculation of probability; or application of, as you say, reasonableness. It's not outside the bounds of expection to see someone juggling 3 tennis balls, but it is to see someone walking on water.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Common sense is genius dressed in its working clothes.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
258
RE: Christ's birthday
November 29, 2009 at 2:28 am
Hmmm..... I love my family, too but I wouldn't believe much of what they tell me.
Posts: 8
Threads: 1
Joined: November 30, 2009
Reputation:
0
RE: Christ's birthday
November 30, 2009 at 3:19 pm
I agree.
Posts: 1694
Threads: 24
Joined: August 28, 2008
Reputation:
22
RE: Christ's birthday
December 1, 2009 at 8:53 am
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2009 at 9:13 pm by chatpilot.)
I am glad that we mostly agree on the impossibility of Christ having a birthday based on his non-existence. Padraic, I don't consider trusting what a family member or close friend states as true the same thing as faith. Because in most cases what a friend or family member tells you can usually be verified in one form or another and is not beyond the reach of investigation, as is the existence of God and the many claims and miracles of the bible. I used to equate trust with faith but although faith contains trust it's what you are placing your trust in that makes a difference. Trust in something mundane such as a rumor or an urban legend is a far cry from trusting something supramundane and outside of all verification or investigation.
|
