Mt. Soledad cross ordered to be taken down

[Joods]

You've never seen me cherry pick, I've backed up many verses with other verses to show a truth, just because you want accept them doesn't mean they are wrong, on the contrary it means the truth was revealed and you didn't like it, that's not a very responsible way to have a valid discussion.

GC

So you're really saying this: 

[Godscreated]

You've never seen me cherry pick, I've backed up many verses with other verses to show a truth, just because you want accept them doesn't mean they are wrong, on the contrary it means the truth was revealed and you didn't like it, that's not a very responsible way to have a valid discussion.

GC

lol, "I'm right because I'm right and you're a dumb poopyhead!" is not the most convincing argument I've ever seen mounted.

I said nothing close to that, I said the Bible is right and you seem to reject the truth that comes from it.

GC

[Godscreated]

Here's the thing, I've seen no contradictions in scripture, one has to study the whole of scripture to see it's truth outside of that it's cherry picking.

GC

In plain words, one has to be taught how to twist the words of a perfect, infallable gawd to reconcile the irreconcilable.

 So sad when one can't understand such a simple statement as the one I made above, bold by me.

 GC

[Godscreated]

Here's the thing, I've seen no contradictions in scripture, one has to study the whole of scripture to see it's truth outside of that it's cherry picking.

GC

You also think ad hoc explanations are valid way of resolving apparent contradictions, based on the assumption that there can't possibly be a real contradiction in the Bible.

 Give example please.

GC

[Thumpalumpacus]

lol, "I'm right because I'm right and you're a dumb poopyhead!" is not the most convincing argument I've ever seen mounted.

I said nothing close to that, I said the Bible is right and you seem to reject the truth that comes from it.

GC

Actually, you did say that, albeit in words that seem less childish but are equally idiotic. Of course, I don't expect you will be able to draw the parallel. You're not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

And yes, I reject your Bible and your faith. Any truth which comes from it -- inconsequential as it may be -- is overshadowed by the falseness of its essential premise. Rat poison tastes good to rats ... but I'm not a rat. If you are a rat, great. Shut the fuck up and eat your poison.

[Thumpalumpacus]

In plain words, one has to be taught how to twist the words of a perfect, infallable gawd to reconcile the irreconcilable.

 So sad when one can't understand such a simple statement as the one I made above, bold by me.

 GC

Even sadder when someone misconstrues disagreement with misunderstanding. That's the surest sign of a mind which cannot look past its own horizon.

Which in your case is about fifteen feet away.

[Joods]

I said nothing close to that, I said the Bible is right and you seem to reject the truth that comes from it.

GC

See my picture above.

[Mister Agenda]

You also think ad hoc explanations are valid way of resolving apparent contradictions, based on the assumption that there can't possibly be a real contradiction in the Bible.

 Give example please.

GC

Did those with Saul/Paul at his conversion hear a voice?
ACTS 9:7 "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."
ACTS 22:9 "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."

[Godscreated]

 Give example please.

GC

Did those with Saul/Paul at his conversion hear a voice?
ACTS 9:7 "And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man."
ACTS 22:9 "And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me."

That's not a contradiction of what the scriptures teach, that in no way changes the Bibles meaning, it's late and I'll look closer at the verses when I get a chance.

GC

[dyresand]