Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 28, 2024, 3:02 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
#31
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
(January 8, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 6:34 pm)Ksa Wrote: What? Are you unfamiliar with Brian Greene's multiverse theory? That this is an universe among many, like suggested by our extraordinary value of empty space density?

Existence has no beginning and no end, this universe may have a beginning but it's just the event horizon, we know nothing else. If we spawned later in the future, we would have no measurable evidence that there even are other galaxies because they would have accelerated away from the event horizon long ago.

You're just dead wrong.
This irritates me about scientists. They use "theory" in two distinct ways and then express frustration when the public misapplies the term ("Evolution is only a theory!"). Brian Greene's multiverse "theory" is a scientific hypothesis and requires confirmation by evidence to be anything more. That said, the Earth was not created in the beginning (of our space-time universe), and my point stands unscathed.

If the universe was not created how do you explain the fine tooning for everything. Also creation must have the Creator!
Reply
#32
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
(January 9, 2014 at 7:22 pm)Sinnersburninhell100 Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: This irritates me about scientists. They use "theory" in two distinct ways and then express frustration when the public misapplies the term ("Evolution is only a theory!"). Brian Greene's multiverse "theory" is a scientific hypothesis and requires confirmation by evidence to be anything more. That said, the Earth was not created in the beginning (of our space-time universe), and my point stands unscathed.

If the universe was not created how do you explain the fine tooning for everything. Also creation must have the Creator!

Have you by any chance ever heard of a man named Charles Darwin? I'm genuinely asking.
Reply
#33
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
(January 9, 2014 at 7:22 pm)Sinnersburninhell100 Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: This irritates me about scientists. They use "theory" in two distinct ways and then express frustration when the public misapplies the term ("Evolution is only a theory!"). Brian Greene's multiverse "theory" is a scientific hypothesis and requires confirmation by evidence to be anything more. That said, the Earth was not created in the beginning (of our space-time universe), and my point stands unscathed.

If the universe was not created how do you explain the fine tooning for everything. Also creation must have the Creator!

I call troll or POE on this one.
Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.

[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]
Reply
#34
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
Oh no! My religious conviction depended entirely on the notion that the planet Earth is the same age as the whole universe. Oh the humanity!
Reply
#35
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
(January 9, 2014 at 9:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Oh no! My religious conviction depended entirely on the notion that the planet Earth is the same age as the whole universe. Oh the humanity!

Why not just give it to him this time? It's all he has up his sleeve.
But if we walk in the light, as He is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, His Son, purifies us from all sin.
Reply
#36
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
(January 9, 2014 at 7:22 pm)Sinnersburninhell100 Wrote:
(January 8, 2014 at 6:41 pm)Pickup_shonuff Wrote: This irritates me about scientists. They use "theory" in two distinct ways and then express frustration when the public misapplies the term ("Evolution is only a theory!"). Brian Greene's multiverse "theory" is a scientific hypothesis and requires confirmation by evidence to be anything more. That said, the Earth was not created in the beginning (of our space-time universe), and my point stands unscathed.

If the universe was not created how do you explain the fine tooning for everything. Also creation must have the Creator!

Fine to tooning? I knew Chuck Jones was a god.
Reply
#37
RE: Genesis 1:1 contradicts science.
(January 9, 2014 at 10:09 pm)Polaris Wrote:
(January 9, 2014 at 9:02 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Oh no! My religious conviction depended entirely on the notion that the planet Earth is the same age as the whole universe. Oh the humanity!

Why not just give it to him this time? It's all he has up his sleeve.

How do you I don't have five loaves and two fish up there too? Tongue
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is this a contradiction or am I reading it wrong? Genesis 5:28 Ferrocyanide 110 9453 April 10, 2023 at 3:32 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  There are no answers in Genesis LinuxGal 248 20718 March 24, 2023 at 7:34 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
  Plantinga's "Free Will" defense contradicts Christianity mrj 96 5696 February 8, 2020 at 6:41 pm
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 68405 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Genesis interpretations - how many are there? Fake Messiah 129 17145 January 22, 2019 at 7:33 pm
Last Post: donlor
  Free interpretation of the Genesis 3:5 KJV theBorg 19 3725 November 13, 2016 at 2:03 am
Last Post: RiddledWithFear
  Genesis - The Prequel! Time Traveler 12 3256 May 17, 2016 at 1:16 am
Last Post: Love333
  Rewriting the bible part 1 - Genesis dyresand 4 1955 March 12, 2016 at 3:14 am
Last Post: robvalue
  god is a moron - genesis dyresand 70 18822 August 7, 2015 at 5:03 pm
Last Post: Wyrd of Gawd
  The Real Bible: Genesis Chapter 1 Theoretical Skeptic 25 7064 May 6, 2015 at 7:01 am
Last Post: Hatshepsut



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)