RE: Sod's Law
November 30, 2009 at 10:10 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2009 at 10:11 am by theVOID.)
I wonder what would happen if the IPU and FSM procreated? Maybe that's how universes are born?
.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 26, 2024, 1:29 am
Thread Rating:
|
Sod's Law
|
 RE: Sod's Law
November 30, 2009 at 10:16 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2009 at 10:21 am by Pope Alfred.)
(November 30, 2009 at 10:10 am)theVOID Wrote: I wonder what would happen if the IPU and FSM procreated? Maybe that's how universes are born?Now that really is an interesting thought. Of course, the FSM couldn't see the IPU (BHHH) - Sod's Law! 
Only sheep need a shepherd.
 theVOID Wrote:I wonder what would happen if the IPU and FSM procreated? Maybe that's how universes are born? What are you talking about? That just plain self-evidently is how it happens! EvF  (November 30, 2009 at 10:16 am)Pope Alfred Wrote:(November 30, 2009 at 10:10 am)theVOID Wrote: I wonder what would happen if the IPU and FSM procreated? Maybe that's how universes are born?Now that really is an interesting thought. Of course, the FSM couldn't see the IPU (BHHH) - Sod's Law! Dude FSM is all powerful.... Besides, if i can bag a girl and not see her till the morning then the FSM can for sure.
.
(November 30, 2009 at 10:26 am)theVOID Wrote: Dude FSM is all powerful.... Besides, if i can bag a girl and not see her till the morning then the FSM can for sure.I think I can remember doing that. It was so long ago... Anyway, the FSM could use His Noodly Appendage, so the visiblity issue is not crucial. 
Only sheep need a shepherd.
 RE: Sod's Law
November 30, 2009 at 10:58 am
(This post was last modified: November 30, 2009 at 11:05 am by Ace Otana.)
(November 30, 2009 at 9:51 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I don't get it. Sod's law got me a few times. Now I don't take it seriously just as I don't take Fodo's religion seriously. Sod's law from my perspective has always been the strange unknown nature of the unexpected natural event that is mostly unpredicable. We naturaly try to avoid bad situations often and at times let our guard down and expect certain events to take place as predicted. Sod's law is the opposite to our desire and predicted event. So the saying "expect the worst and hope for the best" comes into play. Accidently knocking off buttered toast will cause it to land buttered face down on the floor. It is the unexpected and unplaned natural event. Knocking it off yourself as if to simulate the accidental event will cause the buttered side to land face up. (As I've been told) And so sod's law is acting on the opposite side of your planed/predicted event. Expecting the worst to take place is suppost to cause sod's law to play on and work on your favour. I don't believe in it mind you, I'm just going by knowledge. Sod's law is the strange and unknown natural event that supposedly works on the opposite side of your intentions and any prediction you may have. To give a small example, when you intend to say knock something off, it doesn't. When you accidently move your arm and you knock it off...(same object)...that's sod's law. The opposite action to your intentions. Simple really but it hasn't anything to do with anything spiritual. Just an unknown natural thing. This is something you either believe or do don't thing. I don't so that you know, but at times in the past I have thought about it.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity. Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist. You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
I don't believe it because it's as nonsensical as a philosophy wishful thinking in and of itself!
 It's like a 'pessimistic' version of "The Secret"/"The Law of Attraction", etc., I guess. EvF (November 30, 2009 at 11:14 am)EvidenceVsFaith Wrote: I don't believe it because it's as nonsensical as a philosophy wishful thinking in and of itself! I agree. Silly stuff but interesting though.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity. Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist. You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
It was. I got bored of it and now consider it paltry, lol.
EvF
The Secret is one of the things that pisses me off the most of all the metaphysical claims. I'm willing to bet the direct change in situation attributable to the secret is the negative impact of money leaving ones wallet to buy it in the first place.
.
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
