Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 31, 2024, 11:08 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
Sorry pocararcas, but I've been arguing with theses idiots a long time before I came to this forum.

One cretinist I dealt with believed wholeheartedly in the inerrancy of the KJV, ancient aliens and ancient super civilizations simultaneously.

It is impossible to reason with stupidity such as this.
[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 6:37 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Sorry pocararcas, but I've been arguing with theses idiots a long time before I came to this forum.

One cretinist I dealt with believed wholeheartedly in the inerrancy of the KJV, ancient aliens and ancient super civilizations simultaneously.

It is impossible to reason with stupidity such as this.

Can we try to understand where it comes from, what makes it stick in that mind and, perhaps.... find a way to spawn some form of reason in there?
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
You could, if pride had nothing to do with it Rolleyes
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 6:56 am)LastPoet Wrote: You could, if pride had nothing to do with it Rolleyes

Wink
Of course, the spawn would not become apparent to us.
It would have to grow for quite a while...
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 5:52 am)Tonus Wrote: And it's pretty clear he's not an original thinker

That's putting it mildly.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 5:52 am)Tonus Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 5:19 am)pocaracas Wrote: I like to think he's taking my advice and actually researching the details of what he wants to present, before he comes through with the same old, long debunked, creationist apologetics.
The best you can hope is that he comes up with something original, but that's pretty tough to do anymore. And it's pretty clear he's not an original thinker; he copy/pastes a lot of stuff and offers little additional input of his own.


None of this posts so far suggests he has anything remotely like mental agility or a real sense of curiosity. He is unlikely to come up with anything original even if no one has ever written anything on apologetics at all before.

For him, believing in god makes him feel included and looked after, therefore god is true and all to the contrary a insidious plot to deprive him of his security blanket. That's all there is too it.
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 6:49 am)pocaracas Wrote: Can we try to understand where it comes from, what makes it stick in that mind and, perhaps.... find a way to spawn some form of reason in there?

I really think it could happen, but it would require a one on one setting. He is too easily able to dodge the tough questions and choose to answer the quips and prods rather than consider anything in depth.

I would really like to see him and Esquilax locked in a debate forum. I'm up for it, too---but I'd like to see Esquilax force him to engage.
"There remain four irreducible objections to religious faith: that it wholly misrepresents the origins of man and the cosmos, that because of this original error it manages to combine the maximum servility with the maximum of solipsism, that it is both the result and the cause of dangerous sexual repression, and that it is ultimately grounded on wish-thinking." ~Christopher Hitchens, god is not Great

PM me your email address to join the Slack chat! I'll give you a taco(or five) if you join! --->There's an app and everything!<---
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 9:58 am)Chuck Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 5:52 am)Tonus Wrote: The best you can hope is that he comes up with something original, but that's pretty tough to do anymore. And it's pretty clear he's not an original thinker; he copy/pastes a lot of stuff and offers little additional input of his own.


None of this posts so far suggests he has anything remotely like mental agility or a real sense of curiosity. He is unlikely to come up with anything original even if no one has ever written anything on apologetics at all before.

For him, believing in god makes him feel included and looked after, therefore god is true and all to the contrary a insidious plot to deprive him of his security blanket. That's all there is too it.

And yet in his mind he will have won.



You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.

Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.




 








Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 2:53 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 9:58 am)Chuck Wrote: None of this posts so far suggests he has anything remotely like mental agility or a real sense of curiosity. He is unlikely to come up with anything original even if no one has ever written anything on apologetics at all before.

For him, believing in god makes him feel included and looked after, therefore god is true and all to the contrary a insidious plot to deprive him of his security blanket. That's all there is too it.

And yet in his mind he will have won.
Tis the way of the chess playing pigeon.
Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
RE: Argument #1: Transitional Fossils
(April 29, 2014 at 2:42 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote:
(April 29, 2014 at 6:49 am)pocaracas Wrote: Can we try to understand where it comes from, what makes it stick in that mind and, perhaps.... find a way to spawn some form of reason in there?

I really think it could happen, but it would require a one on one setting. He is too easily able to dodge the tough questions and choose to answer the quips and prods rather than consider anything in depth.

I would really like to see him and Esquilax locked in a debate forum. I'm up for it, too---but I'd like to see Esquilax force him to engage.

You can't force anyone to engage, around here...
You can just force them to stay away.... actually, it's not you... but Esq can.

Anyway, we just keep pounding him in a way that he reads and pays a minimum of attention.
Keep the profanities to a low, because we know these people will shut down at the sight of them and talk politely.
That's my strategy, at least... In a few years, we'll see if it works...
Reply





Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)