What do you think about Youtube atheist?

[atheist04330]

youtube is good

[Polaris]

As with most atheists who post online, they do much more harm than good.

Realy? How so? Can you expand on that?

I have found many atheists who post online to adhere to failed logic and incorrect academic information they copy from nothing more than blogs. If you have ever visited the Religion section of Huffington Post for example, then you will likely have seen some of the dumbest atheists you will ever meet (even other atheists I have met online feel they are retarded).

From what I have observed, on the average, the religious folk who post online are more intelligent than their nonbeliever counterparts. Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet.

[Cato]

From what I have observed, on the average, the religious folk who post online are more intelligent than their nonbeliever counterparts.

Your powers of observation are in dire need of calibration.

[Simon Moon]

Here's a few that I like:

TheoreticalBullshit - impeccable logic. His refutations of all the philosophical arguments for the existence of god are the best Ive seen.

AaronRa - his shredding of creationists is brilliant in his 'Foundational Falsehoods of Creationism' series.

Darkmatter2525 - hilarious cartoons about the Bible.

NonStampCollector - more cartoons. His best may be "The Thing that made the things for which there is no known maker".

DeistPaladin -

philhellenes - his "Why Didn't Anybody Tell Me" vid is reason enough to be a fan, but he's got more great ones.

TherimanTrees - another impeccable logician.

QualiaSoup - great vids on critical thinking.

[MJ the Skeptical]

The Atheism+ youtubers are morons. They have good points about religion, but they're just a bunch of feminists trying to disperse atheists more than we already are.

[LostLocke]

Potholer is another good one. He's always been one of my favorites, and I wish he'd do more.

[MJ the Skeptical]

I have found many atheists who post online to adhere to failed logic and incorrect academic information they copy from nothing more than blogs. If you have ever visited the Religion section of Huffington Post for example, then you will likely have seen some of the dumbest atheists you will ever meet (even other atheists I have met online feel they are retarded).

From what I have observed, on the average, the religious folk who post online are more intelligent than their nonbeliever counterparts. Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet.

If by harm you mean, atheists do harm to your religion, then yes I agree, otherwise you're just an obtuse moron if you think atheism is somehow harmful. You're the ones who regurgitate an old book from mystics who didn't know the Earth was round but you criticize copying from a blog lol. You're posts are, ironic, seeing as how you've put forward nothing academic in your assertion about atheists.

Religions are dying because of the internet (especially on sites like youtube). Atheist videos get mostly thumbs up and religious videos mostly get thumbs down, ironic huh? So much for atheists doing harm (and harm to what? lol). What a bunch of bad people, spreading critical thinking, empirical standards of evidence and reason. Causing all that harm, we should fly planes into buildings and try to stifle social progress, then we'll be just like you wholesome religitards.

Dumb theists don't post on the internet? what alternate dimension do you live in and what kind of dipshits would give you rep points...How can they resist giving you a rep what with your uncanny perception of reality.

[Ravenshire]

From what I have observed, on the average, the religious folk who post online are more intelligent than their nonbeliever counterparts. Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet.

Confirmation bias.

[Polaris]

I have found many atheists who post online to adhere to failed logic and incorrect academic information they copy from nothing more than blogs. If you have ever visited the Religion section of Huffington Post for example, then you will likely have seen some of the dumbest atheists you will ever meet (even other atheists I have met online feel they are retarded).

From what I have observed, on the average, the religious folk who post online are more intelligent than their nonbeliever counterparts. Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet.

If by harm you mean, atheists do harm to your religion, then yes I agree, otherwise you're just an obtuse moron if you think atheism is somehow harmful. You're the ones who regurgitate an old book from mystics who didn't know the Earth was round but you criticize copying from a blog lol. You're posts are, ironic, seeing as how you've put forward nothing academic in your assertion about atheists.

Religions are dying because of the internet (especially on sites like youtube). Atheist videos get mostly thumbs up and religious videos mostly get thumbs down, ironic huh? So much for atheists doing harm (and harm to what? lol). What a bunch of bad people, spreading critical thinking, empirical standards of evidence and reason. Causing all that harm, we should fly planes into buildings and try to stifle social progress, then we'll be just like you wholesome religitards.

Dumb theists don't post on the internet? what alternate dimension do you live in and what kind of dipshits would give you rep points...How can they resist giving you a rep what with your uncanny perception of reality.

You do realize your post is very much indicative of those atheists I was stereotyping in my post, right?

There will be dumb theists who post online, but they still tend to be more intelligent than yourself. Maybe atheists who post online would get more likes if they actually acted in a logical manner instead of letting emotions dictate their decisions.

[Natachan]

Must not take low-hanging fruit...

The grammar nazi in me is twitching at the irony.