What do you think about Youtube atheist?

[MJ the Skeptical]

If by harm you mean, atheists do harm to your religion, then yes I agree, otherwise you're just an obtuse moron if you think atheism is somehow harmful. You're the ones who regurgitate an old book from mystics who didn't know the Earth was round but you criticize copying from a blog lol. You're posts are, ironic, seeing as how you've put forward nothing academic in your assertion about atheists.

Religions are dying because of the internet (especially on sites like youtube). Atheist videos get mostly thumbs up and religious videos mostly get thumbs down, ironic huh? So much for atheists doing harm (and harm to what? lol). What a bunch of bad people, spreading critical thinking, empirical standards of evidence and reason. Causing all that harm, we should fly planes into buildings and try to stifle social progress, then we'll be just like you wholesome religitards.

Dumb theists don't post on the internet? what alternate dimension do you live in and what kind of dipshits would give you rep points...How can they resist giving you a rep what with your uncanny perception of reality.

You do realize your post is very much indicative of those atheists I was stereotyping in my post, right?

There will be dumb theists who post online, but they still tend to be more in intelligent than yourself.

Wow, nice academic rebuttal. Showing your intellectual prowess I see.




"Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet"

Again, what dimension do you live in? Dumbass galaxy 235b?

[Marsellus Wallace]

I have found a few that I like and a few others that I wish would just shut their faces.

https://www.youtube.com/user/JaclynGlenn is officially my favorite. She doesn't have a boat load of videos at the moment but she is awesome!

Plus, she's gorgeous!

You like her cuz she's gorgeous or cuz she is presenting the idea in a good way ?

[Rabb Allah]

Realy? How so? Can you expand on that?

I have found many atheists who post online to adhere to failed logic and incorrect academic information they copy from nothing more than blogs. If you have ever visited the Religion section of Huffington Post for example, then you will likely have seen some of the dumbest atheists you will ever meet (even other atheists I have met online feel they are retarded).

From what I have observed, on the average, the religious folk who post online are more intelligent than their nonbeliever counterparts. Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet.

Usually it is the other way around. On the youtube scene it is entirely overrun by atheist who use simplistic logic while the theists(primarily Muslim for me but sometimes Christians) just start quoting scripture and making basic fallacies on science and theology. This actually takes up all my youtube arguments.

[MJ the Skeptical]

Where is your evidence for Atheists causing harm Polaris? you pseudo-intellectual twit.

[Marsellus Wallace]

I've only seen one video by the amazing atheist. My thoughts, what a dick. I'll pass on watching any more of those.

That's the whole point and what makes him different at least. whats the point of being polite and nice ? that's some boring shit .

[MJ the Skeptical]

I've only seen one video by the amazing atheist. My thoughts, what a dick. I'll pass on watching any more of those.

To each their own I guess, I find him to be one of the better youtube atheists out there. He makes lots of great points if you can just get past some of his quirks.

If abrasive isn't your thing, then I guess a more weak atheist would be better for you

[Polaris]

You do realize your post is very much indicative of those atheists I was stereotyping in my post, right?

There will be dumb theists who post online, but they still tend to be more in intelligent than yourself.

Wow, nice academic rebuttal. Showing your intellectual prowess I see.




"Then again, the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet"

Again, what dimension do you live in? Dumbass galaxy 235b?

Weren't what is labeled as the Dark Ages when the established Christian Church was at its weakest? I could have sworn it did not really re-gain power until after the invasion by the Moors.

[MJ the Skeptical]

Weren't what is labeled as the Dark Ages when the established Christian Church was at its weakest? I could have sworn it did not really re-gain power until after the invasion by the Moors.

Nice revisionist history there bud. Almost as funny as your "the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet" gem of a statement.

[Natachan]

Weren't what is labeled as the Dark Ages when the established Christian Church was at its weakest? I could have sworn it did not really re-gain power until after the invasion by the Moors.

If by weakest you mean the major political and economic power house. Holding more wealth than any other government or entity and able to mobilize a larger military force than anyone else at the time.

[Polaris]

Weren't what is labeled as the Dark Ages when the established Christian Church was at its weakest? I could have sworn it did not really re-gain power until after the invasion by the Moors.

Nice revisionist history there bud. Almost as funny as your "the dumbest believers likely don't even use the internet" gem of a statement.

The dumbest theists don't use the internet. That's too advanced for them.

I see you fail at history just the same as you fail at logic. The Christian Church regained power (and then gained ever more power) when it was propped up to counter the threat of Islam in the 8th century CE.