Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Capt,
Off the top of my head;
There are a bunch of groups,but these come to mind-
Trilateral Commission,
Bilderburgers ( partial member list and info below, I copied from the Jeremiahproject.com - for information and discussion purposes)
Among the elitist membership or attendees at Bilderberg meetings is David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Lloyd Bentsen, Helmut Kohl, Prince Charles, Prince Juan Carlos I of Spain, Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Katharine Graham, Alice Rivlin, Gerald Ford, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Dan Quayle, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin L. Powell, John Edwards, Bill Bradley, Bill Richardson, Christopher Dodd, Dianne Feinstein, Kathleen Sebelius, Alexander Haig, Ralph E. Reed, George Stephanopoulos, William J McDonough (former president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York), U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner, George Soros, Paul Volcker & Alan Greenspan (former Chairman of the Federal Reserve), Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, World Bank president Robert Zoellick, H. J. Heinz II (CEO of H. J. Heinz Company), Peter A. Thiel (Co-Founder, PayPal), Hillary ClintonEric E. Schmidt (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Google), Lloyd Blankfein (CEO of Goldman Sachs), Rupert Murdoch, Donald E. Graham (Chairman of the Board of The Washington Post Company), William F. Buckley, Jr. (founder of National Review and former host of Firing Line), Peter Jennings, George Will, Lesley Stahl, Bill D. Moyers, and many others. The list includes prominent persons in politics, the military, financial institutions, major corporations, academia, and the media.
Leaders of the Bilderberg Club argue that discretion is necessary to allow participants in the debates to speak freely without being on the record or reported publicly.
David Rockefeller-"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller
In Jason Bermas' film, Invisible Empire is all conspiracy and no theory – proving beyond doubt how the elite have openly conspired to insidiously rule the globe via the engines of the CFR, the United Nations, the Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg group.
My comments below-
Did you happen to notice David Rockerfeller's 4 words; "..Towards a world government"..
Guys, THESE are the people who actually run the system, plan the wars, direct the propaganda machines. They have already planned to divide the world into ten regions but obviously have not implemented it yet.
(The ten heads of the beast described in Revelation.)
A while ago I had to look up the significance of a tin foil hat.
I do get a kick out of reading your comments on myself, some are oustandingly funny.
I just noticed one bunch in the list above are conspicuously absent - the European international bankers, prime movers in the plan.
So, prof. Got any actual evidence for these bullshit assertions?
I'll bet you can't come up with one single reputable source for any of it.
'Dugong Deity Wrote:I don't like it but I don't think it's my fault.
No one is claiming it's your fault. Fault runs many directions on this.
But, at this point, if you're not willing to become part of the solution, you become, like the prof, part of the problem.
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
Global warming is real and there is little that can be done about it. If there was a lot that can be done about it and an easy solution to it, almost everyone would accept the problem and the solution. The problem is there is no easy solution so people go in denial mode.
As for suicide and all, my advice is hang in there and try to make the best of what you got.
Yeah, global warming is so real we had the coldest, nastiest winter here in western NY than we have had in a long time and the prediction is for another similar one dead ahead.
Oh, I forgot, they changed it to "Climate Change" to cover over the obvious lie.
If you see a sale on tin foil- send me a PM. I'm clearly running low.
(August 30, 2014 at 5:38 pm)professor Wrote: Yeah, global warming is so real we had the coldest, nastiest winter here in western NY than we have had in a long time and the prediction is for another similar one dead ahead.
Oh, I forgot, they changed it to "Climate Change" to cover over the obvious lie.
If you see a sale on tin foil- send me a PM. I'm clearly running low.
What possible reason would the scientific community have for making up climate change?
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
Here is the reason for the scientific community being involved with Climate change-
Government money flows to the education system to science people in the form of grants for specific studies.
When government has an agenda on environment (for example) in this case, the people behind the government desire the US to blend into a more controllable entity and have been looking for entry points.
The environment is the perfect vehicle - witness the EPA and various letter agencies having ultimate say on industry for years here.
Example: govt. agent canvasses colleges seeking a connection between air quality and industry, agent working with the school explains the goal of the study, study begins. If the input from the study meets the goals of the agency- the study continues- money keeps coming in.
Professors really like money just like everyone else.
If the study lacks what the agency is looking for- money stops.
It is ALWAYS about the money.
If one thinks scientific guys are above taking bucks for leaning their charts over the right way- you are living in la la land.
The company I work for has students at a local college on a bearing project, it's good for them and good for us.
I have a buddy in another company doing the same with 5 different projects.
The difference is little or no money is involved.
UNLIKE govt backed studies.
If you follow the money-crumb trail, rather than the propaganda trail, reality is quite different.
I am reminded of what a president of the US said decades ago.
It went something like this: "The country is run by very different personages than what the public believes". The guy was being honest.
Remarkable event.
I am also reminded about all the shrill propaganda 40 or so years ago of the imminent ice age that would doom us. I was there. I remember.
This is just another scam like that one.
The whole point of peer-review is that you can't just make up figures to fit your theories - your findings have to be repeatable to be taken seriously. If you want to prove your theory (which involves every climatologist being in on some massive conspiracy) you have to go and repeat several times the experiments that have been done to show climate change is happening and show why they don't show climate change if you do find something different.
You claim that scientists are fabricating data to support their claims, but you have none to support yours, yet you think we should take you seriously?
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world. - J.R.R Tolkien
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50.-LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea.-LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
(August 29, 2014 at 11:24 pm)psychoslice Wrote: I agree we are doing some harm, but we still have to except what climate we are given get from the earth, if we weren't here, I still believe that the climate will still change
This is true to a very small extent. We are busily poring vast amounts of CO2 from every past epoch into the atmosphere as well as growing farting animals while simultaneously retarding the planets natural cooling mechanisms by destroying forests and blocking off rivers screwing with the long term carbon cycle. The earth is warming now at a pace not seen since the deacon traps erupted and that is a possible cause of the Permian extinction.
In short we humans are doing everything we can as fast as we can to warm the planet to untenable levels.
The climate would change without us, but slower and in a less damaging way.
That it would change anyway is not a reason to not do anything.
I think world wide people should kill all domestic dogs, cease production of beef, kill the cows. Use the land what was used for cows to plant trees, and find alternative fuel for vehicles and to produce electricity . That's if people are really worried about global warming. It probably won't effect me in my lifetime and no one else seems to care.
I'm pissed off that I found out that for some reason climate change means britain will get even colder, even as we're being flooded by global warming, I thought I'd at least be able to get a good tan while I'm dying but apparently not.
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
