Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
| Poll: Should Gays have rights in society? This poll is closed. |
|||
| Yes, this is their natural right to be gay. | 13 | 92.86% | |
| No, being gay is not natural therefore they have no natural right to be gay. | 0 | 0% | |
| No, being gay is against a Divine Command and therefore they have no rights but be subject to punishment! | 0 | 0% | |
| Yes, this is not a natural right but Gays have rights to be Gay no matter the circumstances and social templates. | 1 | 7.14% | |
| Total | 14 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
|
 RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 1:14 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2014 at 1:15 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
To the OP's poll: there are no natural rights in a nation, anyway. Rights are abstractions, and granted (or seized) by people. Nature grants no rights at all, not even the right to breathe.
 RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 2:05 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 12:24 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: Okay they can get marred if they what but they shouldn't be able to get marred in a church a place were it is not accepted. Agreed. Churches that don't support gay marriage shouldn't have to marry gays. So, does this mean you are pro-gay marriage - that is, homosexual marriages should be afforded all the rights and privileges currently granted to heterosexual marriages by the government?  RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 4:49 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2014 at 4:50 pm by C4RM5.)
I am not to sure, I wouldn't say I was pro gay marriage.
 RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:01 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 4:49 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I am not to sure, I wouldn't say I was pro gay marriage. Then don't have one. It's that simple.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? ![[Image: LB_Header_Idea_A.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk172%2FBlaziken_rjcf%2FLB_Header_Idea_A.jpg) RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:04 pm
What do you mean?
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:09 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 5:04 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: What do you mean? If you don't like marriage between two people of the same sex, then don't get married to someone of the same sex. If you don't like apple pie, then don't eat apple pie. If you don't like morning cartoons, then don't watch morning cartoons. If you don't like trading card games, then don't play trading card games. Not doing the last three examples and instead trying to get them banned would be considered extremist behavior by just about everyone, so why does the first one get a pass?
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:13 pm
I wasn't out right saying I don't like gay marriage I said I wasn't sure, put it this way if I was asked to go to a gay marriage I would decline.
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:17 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 5:13 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I wasn't out right saying I don't like gay marriage I said I wasn't sure, put it this way if I was asked to go to a gay marriage I would decline. You don't have to like it. You just have to understand that nobody is being hurt and not try to take away people's freedom to do it. Personally, I don't like marriage in the first place. However, you don't see me trying to make all marriages illegal.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:19 pm
I fever said they should be illegal I just said that people can't force others to allow their marriage to take place in a church where they don't suupport gay marriage, everyone else agreed, so what is your problem?
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:21 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 5:19 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I fever said they should be illegal I just said that people can't force others to allow their marriage to take place in a church where they don't suupport gay marriage, everyone else agreed, so what is your problem? My problem is that you then said the following: (October 12, 2014 at 4:49 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I am not to sure, I wouldn't say I was pro gay marriage.Which is the post I replied to. That, in and of itself, should have been the biggest hint about what my problem was.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
