Billboard proclaims "Nobody is born gay"

[Ryantology]

Well something that doesn't exists, doesn't deserver to be to be even thought about, why wast your time ?.

Because it's funny.

[robvalue]

What does twins have anything to do with choosing to be gay? If we could choose to be gay for a day, don't you think everyone would have noticed that by now?

Fucking absolute total retard morally bankrupt filth.

[Silver]

It has to do with genetics. Twins have identical DNA. If homosexuality is genetic, why can one twin be gay while another is not?

[robvalue]

I see, thanks.

But again, I think I'd notice if I had a switch in my head that could make me go gay. I don't need "Christian science" to help me understand myself :p

And, as has been said, so what? If people can choose to be gay temporarily or permanently, what's the problem?

I think the implication is that people who are gay have chosen to be gay, but somehow people who aren't gay can't choose to be gay. Makes no sense I know, but it's the only "point" they can make with this propaganda. Or else, the people spreading the hate are just as likely as anyone else to suddenly fancy a bit of cock.

If I want to be attracted to men, who cares? How is it any of their business what we do with our reproductive organs?

They can go take a long walk off a short pier. Then die.

[Ryantology]

It has to do with genetics. Twins have identical DNA. If homosexuality is genetic, why can one twin be gay while another is not?

It's a little more complicated than that.

[robvalue]

Oh I'm sure it is I wasn't for a second granting their research is valid.

[Hoopington]

Until you can demonstrate that this alleged "natural law" 1) exists in the context of this issue and 2) comes down against gays, I feel fully justified in calling you a bigot.

Your request is simple enough since 1) I have no prejudice against homosexuals as human beings and 2) my position has rational support.

Anyone, other than ontological naturalists, can see that things are partially defined by their natural functions. Living things are, by their nature, directed toward the things that allow them to sustain life and thrive. For example, the heart is directed toward pumping blood.

Likewise, it is a biological fact that for the human race to exist it must reproduce and that is the natural purpose of the genitalia, i.e. to get semen from the penis into the vagina. The pleasure of copulation and the inordinate strength of the sexual appetites serve to motivate people toward productive union.

Now because human infants are not self-sufficient for years, conjugal love also serves the purpose of strengthening the bond between parents to sustain the children that depend on the family for their mental and material support. These are biological facts.

That people pursue sexual pleasure without consciously thinking about procreation is of no consequence. All that matters is that it is directed toward its proper and natural end. There is nothing inherently wrong with kissing, petting and oral/genital contact to the extent that it increases arousal in preparation for intercourse. Unlike these, the possible transfer of feces and harmful bacteria make sodomy an unsuitable preparation for vaginal intercourse. In addition the structure of the anus made for defecation and is not a suitable receptacle for any foreign object.

People both homosexual and heterosexual engage in practices that go contrary to the function of sexuality and in so doing thwart the natural good. I am not against LGB people specifically because I believe it is just as wrong for heterosexual people to engage in practices, like sodomy, necrophilia, pederasty, and bestiality that are contrary to natural law.

You ever had a blowjob?

[downbeatplumb]

I do not 'hate' gays any more that I 'hate' the blind, the bipolar, or diabetic, which is to say not at all.

There is nothing wrong with being gay stop treating it like it's an illness it isn't.

That's projection on the part of obvious bullies. That said, I feel fully justified in expressing indignation against behaviors and beliefs that do not align with natural law.

Its not against any "natural law" as has been mentioned before sex is about more than breeding.

All I hear on the other side is rationalization of perverse desires (both homo- and heterosexual) and an inordinate obsession with sensuality.

Its the Christians who are obsessed with sex, we are in the main happy for consenting adults do what they want with each other.

[robvalue]

A confused mix of medical advice, personifying evolution, mindless bigotry and wanting to control other people's sexual activities.

What on earth gives you the right to judge other people's sexual activities? How does it affect you, or anyone else? If it's just your opinion that you don't like it, that's fine, but that's not an argument.

[downbeatplumb]

A confused mix of medical advice, personifying evolution, mindless bigotry and wanting to control other people's sexual activities.

What on earth gives you the right to judge other people's sexual activities? How does it affect you, or anyone else? If it's just your opinion that you don't like it, that's fine, but that's not an argument.

I'm just jealous other people are having any sex at all. Married for 19 years.