Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 4:26 pm
Thread Rating:
|
Jesus' Sacrifice
|
|
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. The "Mark" we have is not what was written in the first place. Quite possibly nothing much like it at all.
RE: Jesus' Sacrifice
March 9, 2015 at 4:26 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2015 at 4:27 am by Pizza.)
(March 9, 2015 at 2:46 am)Minimalist Wrote: So these people are looking over edited and mistake-ridden copies and trying to figure out where they originally came from and what they said.At best it's a historical guessing game, but that doesn't sound good as a sound bite in a debate if you are an apologist.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal (March 8, 2015 at 11:38 pm)Drich Wrote: Ok, clato. In your opinion what is God trying to communicate with Christ on the cross, that could have been done another way? It's like a used car salesman telling you that when the car breaks down he will personally come and restore it to a pristine condition and guarantees from that moment forward the car will flawlessly run forever with no fuel. All that's asked of you is that you suck his dick every day until the car breaks down.
Another question is..why would Jesus ask if his Father had forsaken him...if he is his Father. It's like Gollum arguing with Smeagol, it's insane.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Jesus' Sacrifice
March 9, 2015 at 8:57 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2015 at 8:58 am by robvalue.)
Could it be...
They didn't have very good editors in those days? Haha. When massive changes to the stories were made, no one had the sense to go through and remove references which were now contradictory. That "conversation" certainly got missed with the retcon. It wouldn't even make any sense for any jesus story where he knew he was meant to die for a purpose. (March 8, 2015 at 9:58 pm)Drich Wrote:(March 8, 2015 at 4:00 pm)Nope Wrote: Drich wrote: You are misreading me. If your god had to suffer for us to gain forgiveness then why is a six hour crucifixion enough compared to the eternity of hell we get for not kissing his ass for that unasked for 'sacrifice". But why suffer at all? That is silly. And no, humans do not need pain and suffering to illustrate the cost of a sacrifice. You are married, Drich. When your wife takes time to do something for you does she also have to physically hurt herself to gain your gratitude? (March 9, 2015 at 8:08 am)Cato Wrote:(March 8, 2015 at 11:38 pm)Drich Wrote: Ok, clato. In your opinion what is God trying to communicate with Christ on the cross, that could have been done another way? See how confused you are about the strong message that is being relayed from the cross? what weaker method could have been used to give you clarity about the freedom we have found in Christ? (March 9, 2015 at 8:24 am)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Another question is..why would Jesus ask if his Father had forsaken him...if he is his Father. It's like Gollum arguing with Smeagol, it's insane. Some Christians think that Jesus actually became sin or somehow took on our literal sin while on the cross. I had a pastor who claimed that god could not look on sin so he could no longer see Jesus. At least, I think that was his explanation. The pastor's explanation countered the idea of an omnipotent god so completely that I felt my former religious brain begin to explode. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



